Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Improving Diabetes Care Via Telephone Assessment and Patient Education
This study has been completed.
First Received: March 14, 2001   Last Updated: May 11, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsored by: Department of Veterans Affairs
Information provided by: Department of Veterans Affairs
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00012649
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to improve the quality of VA diabetes care using an automated telephone disease management (ATDM) system that administers patient assessments and targeted self-care education between clinic visits.


Condition
Diabetes

Study Type: Observational
Official Title: Improving Diabetes Care Via Telephone Assessment and Patient Education

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Department of Veterans Affairs:

Estimated Enrollment: 0
Study Completion Date: May 2003
Groups/Cohorts
1

Detailed Description:

Background:

The purpose of this study is to improve the quality of VA diabetes care using an automated telephone disease management (ATDM) system that administers patient assessments and targeted self-care education between clinic visits.

Objectives:

In this ongoing study, we are determining: 1) the reliability and validity of Automated Telephone Disease Management (ATDM) assessments of patients' glycemic control, health-related quality of life (HRQL), self-care, and satisfaction with care; 2) the extent to which these assessments identify patients at risk for poor outcomes; and 3) the cost-effectiveness of an intervention in which ATDM assessment reports are provided regularly to patients' primary care providers.

Methods:

We are refining and expanding previously-developed ATDM assessment instruments by incorporating measures of patient-centered outcomes. We are enrolling 450 patients from VISN 12 and VISN 21. Patients receive weekly ATDM assessments for six months. Other data on their health status and service use are being collected from medical records, laboratory tests, telephone surveys, and Austin Automation Center files. After determining the concurrent reliability, validity, and prognostic significance of the ATDM assessments, we will examine variation in ATDM-reported outcomes across Networks, facilities, and patient groups. In the second phase of the study, we will conduct an effectiveness trial with a one year follow up period. We will use the findings from our process evaluation to modify the ATDM assessments and design provider feedback reports. We will enroll 240 patients from the two Networks (i.e., 480 patients overall). Patients will be assigned to experimental or usual care control groups using a combination of randomization and cutoff-based assignment. We will measure the intervention's impact on patients' glycemic control, symptoms, self-care, and patient-centered outcomes. We will use VA costing database and Medicare claims files to evaluate cost-effectiveness.

Status:

Analyses of ATDM assessment data suggest that this method is feasible with VA diabetes patients and provides comparable data regarding patients' satisfaction with care and functioning to telephone surveys. Other analysis suggest that VA interpersonal processes of care and rates of cost-related medication adherence problems are as good or better than that experienced by patients with comparable characteristics treated in other systems of care.

  Eligibility

Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients enrolled in VISN 12 and VISN 21

Exclusion Criteria:

  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00012649

Locations
United States, California
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Menlo Park, California, United States, 94025
United States, Michigan
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
United States, North Carolina
Durham VA Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
United States, Wisconsin
W. S. Middleton Memorial VA Medical Center
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Principal Investigator: John D. Piette, PhD VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
  More Information

Publications:
Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K, Wang F, Wilson C, Daher C, Leong-Grotz K, Castro C, Bindman AB. Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jan 13;163(1):83-90.
Piette JD, Richardson C, Valenstein M. Addressing the needs of patients with multiple chronic illnesses: the case of diabetes and depression. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Feb;10(2 Pt 2):152-62.
Heisler M, Wagner TH, Piette JD. Clinician identification of chronically ill patients who have problems paying for prescription medications. Am J Med. 2004 Jun 1;116(11):753-8.
Piette JD. Enhancing support via interactive technologies. Curr Diab Rep. 2002 Apr;2(2):160-5. Review.
Piette JD, Schillinger D, Potter MB, Heisler M. Dimensions of patient-provider communication and diabetes self-care in an ethnically diverse population. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):624-33.
Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Problems paying out-of-pocket medication costs among older adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):384-91.
Piette JD, Wagner TH, Potter MB, Schillinger D. Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2):102-9.
Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse: do patients with chronic illnesses tell their doctors? Arch Intern Med. 2004 Sep 13;164(16):1749-55.
Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. Am J Public Health. 2004 Oct;94(10):1782-7.
McKellar JD, Humphreys K, Piette JD. Depression increases diabetes symptoms by complicating patients' self-care adherence. Diabetes Educ. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):485-92.
Heisler M, Piette JD. "I help you, and you help me": facilitated telephone peer support among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005 Nov-Dec;31(6):869-79.

Responsible Party: Department of Veterans Affairs ( Piette, John - Principal Investigator )
Study ID Numbers: DII 99-187
Study First Received: March 14, 2001
Last Updated: May 11, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00012649     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Metabolic Diseases
Diabetes Mellitus
Endocrine System Diseases
Endocrinopathy
Glucose Metabolism Disorders
Metabolic Disorder

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Metabolic Diseases
Diabetes Mellitus
Endocrine System Diseases
Glucose Metabolism Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on July 02, 2009