|
|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored by: |
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00001518 |
Purpose
The Groshong and Groshong PICC catheters are popular venous access devices because they are maintained with only weekly saline flushes. In a recent study, however, we found an apparent decrease in the rate of withdrawal occlusion in Groshong catheters flushed weekly with heparinized saline. However, a randomized trial is necessary to confirm this impression. In the current study as many as 66 patients will be randomized to each of two treatment arms. The Groshong catheters of one group will be flushed with saline only and the other group with heparinized saline. A comparison will be made between the frequency with which urokinase is used in the two groups to treat withdrawal occlusion during the first three months of catheterization.
Groshong catheters using saline flushes will be compared to Groshong catheters using heparinized saline flushes and Groshong PICC catheters using saline flushes will be compared to Groshong PICC catheters using heparinized saline flushes. Data will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Catheters, Indwelling Thrombosis |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Evaluation of the Effect of Routine Normal Saline Flush Versus Heparinized Saline Solution in Groshong and Groshong PICC Catheters |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 132 |
| Study Start Date: | January 1996 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2000 |
The Groshong and Groshong PICC catheters are popular venous access devices because they are maintained with only weekly saline flushes. In a recent study, however, we found an apparent decrease in the rate of withdrawal occlusion in Groshong catheters flushed weekly with heparinized saline. However, a randomized trial is necessary to confirm this impression. In the current study as many as 66 patients will be randomized to each of two treatment arms. The Groshong catheters of one group will be flushed with saline only and the other group with heparinized saline. A comparison will be made between the frequency with which urokinase is used in the two groups to treat withdrawal occlusion during the first three months of catheterization.
Groshong catheters using saline flushes will be compared to Groshong catheters using heparinized saline flushes and Groshong PICC catheters using saline flushes will be compared to Groshong PICC catheters using heparinized saline flushes. Data will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Adult subjects enrolled in approved protocols of the NCI in the CC or under treatment at the National Naval Medical Center who are planned to have Groshong Catheters used as part of their cancer treatment.
No subjects with a history of allergy to heparin.
No abnormal PT or PTT.
No subjects on anticoagulant therapy.
No history of heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Contacts and Locations More Information
| Study ID Numbers: | 960053, 96-CC-0053 |
| Study First Received: | November 3, 1999 |
| Last Updated: | March 3, 2008 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00001518 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
|
Groshong Catheter Heparinized Flush Solution Intraluminal Clot |
Urokinase Venous Access Device Withdrawal Occlusion |
|
Embolism and Thrombosis Embolism Vascular Diseases Flushing Thrombosis |
|
Embolism and Thrombosis Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Thrombosis |
