Study 6 of 10 for search of: INR and point of care
Previous Study Return to Search Results Next Study

Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, October 2009
First Received: October 18, 2009   Last Updated: October 27, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsor: Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
Collaborator: University Hospital, Essen
Information provided by: Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00997841
  Purpose

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of two different algorithms for coagulation management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery suffering from increased bleeding tendency. Algorithm 1 is based on conventional coagulation analyses (INR, aPTT, platelet count, fibrinogen concentration,...) and Algorithm 2 is based on thrombelastometry using the ROTEM-device and impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate device.


Condition Intervention Phase
Cardiac Surgery
Coagulation Management
Procedure: Point-of-Care versus conventional coagulation management
Phase IV

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Diagnostic, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management in Cardiac Surgery Patients Suffering From Increased Bleeding Tendency - a Prospective and Randomized Study

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Johann Wolfgang Goethe University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • amount of transfused red blood cell concentrates [ Time Frame: 24 h after begin of surgical intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • other transfused blood products including FFP, platelet concentrates and coagulation factor concentrates [ Time Frame: 24h after surgical intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding [ Time Frame: 24h after surgical intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • ventilation time on ICU [ Time Frame: till discharge from ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 200
Study Start Date: June 2009
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date: June 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
POC algorithm: Active Comparator
cardiac surgery patients suffering from increased perioperative bleeding and being treated following Point of Care based algorithm
Procedure: Point-of-Care versus conventional coagulation management
Patients are randomized to receive either point-of-care based or conventional coagulation measurements based coagulation therapy in the case of increased perioperative bleeding tendency
conventional algorithm: Active Comparator
cardiac surgery patients suffering from increased perioperative bleeding and being treated following conventional coagulation management algorithm
Procedure: Point-of-Care versus conventional coagulation management
Patients are randomized to receive either point-of-care based or conventional coagulation measurements based coagulation therapy in the case of increased perioperative bleeding tendency

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years, combined surgical procedures (ACB & valve surgery), double valve surgery, aortic surgery, Re-Dos

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00997841

Contacts
Contact: Christian F Weber, Dr. +4969630187466 christian.weber@kgu.de
Contact: Dirk Meininger, PhD +496963015858 dirk.meininger@kgu.de

Locations
Germany
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology Recruiting
Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 60590
Contact: Christian F Weber, Dr.     +4969630187466     christian.weber@kgu.de    
Contact: Dirk Meininger, PhD     +4969630187629     dirk.meininger@kgu.de    
Principal Investigator: Christian F Weber, Dr.            
University Hospital Essen, Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Active, not recruiting
Essen, Germany, 45473
Sponsors and Collaborators
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
University Hospital, Essen
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Christian F Weber, Dr. Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
  More Information

Publications:
Görlinger K, Jambor C, Hanke A, Adamzik M, Hartmann M, Rahe-Meyer N. Thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry based algorithm for coagulation management in cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 33: 196, 2007.
Görlinger K, Bergmann L, Hartmann M, Marggraf G, Kamler M, Müller-Beißenhirtz H. Reduction of blood transfusion rate by thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry based point-of-care coagulation management in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Appl Cardiopulmon Pathophysiol 13: 174-7, 2009.

Responsible Party: Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany ( Dr. Christian Weber )
Study ID Numbers: POC-9509
Study First Received: October 18, 2009
Last Updated: October 27, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00997841     History of Changes
Health Authority: Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices

Keywords provided by Johann Wolfgang Goethe University:
POC
ROTEM
Multiplate
bleeding tendency
coagulation management
amount of transfused red blood cell concentrates,
FFP
platelet concentrates
rate of rethoracotomy
ventilation time

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 08, 2010