Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient-guided Versus Standard Beta-blocker Therapy in Primary Prevention of Variceal Bleeding (Porthos)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Study hypothesis:
Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)-directed primary prophylaxis with nonselective beta-blocker therapy (NSBB) leads to a reduction in first variceal bleeding episodes and is cost-effective in the long term.
Study design:
A multi-center randomized controlled study comparing nonselective beta-blocker therapy guided by the hemodynamic response as determined by the difference in HVPG before and after starting oral NSBB therapy, to standard heart rate-guided NSBB therapy in patients with esophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis without a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
First variceal bleeding episodes occurring within the first two years.
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
- Mortality
- Occurrence of other cirrhosis-related complications
- Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Costs of treatments
- Adverse effects
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Acute Bleeding Esophageal Varices Liver Cirrhosis |
Procedure: Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement Other: standard of care primary prevention with propranolol |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Study of Primary Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients Treated With HVPG-guided Beta- Blocker Therapy or Standard Heart Rate-guided Beta-blocker Therapy |
- First variceal bleeding episodes [ Time Frame: two years of follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mortality [ Time Frame: two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Occurrence of other cirrhosis-related complications [ Time Frame: two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ascites spontaneous bacterial peritonitis hepatic encephalopathy hepatorenal syndrome hepatocellular carcinoma
- Costs of treatments [ Time Frame: two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Adverse effects [ Time Frame: two years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Adverse effects associated with NSBB therapy, endoscopic band ligation, hepatic venous pressure gradient
| Estimated Enrollment: | 78 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2016 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: HVPG-propranolol arm |
Procedure: Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement
Perform baseline HVPG measurement, then start propranolol 20 mg orally twice daily (BID), increase the dose stepwise to maximum tolerated dose. After 4 weeks a second HVPG is performed. In hemodynamic nonresponders from the study arm, repeated endoscopic band ligation is performed in daycare setting with intervals of 2-4 weeks. In hemodynamic responders (HVPG second measurement< 12 mmHg or >20% reduction in HVPG compared to baseline) beta-blockers are continued until end of follow-up. Other Names:
|
| No Intervention: Propranolol arm |
Other: standard of care primary prevention with propranolol
In control group: Start propranolol 20 mg BID, increase the dose stepwise with 3 days interval to maximum heart rate-guided tolerated dose.
Other Name: Propranolol
|
Hide Detailed DescriptionDetailed Description:
Background of the study:
About 50% of cirrhotic patients who use nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) for primary prevention of variceal bleeding do not reach target hemodynamic response, defined as HVPG < 12 mmHg or a > 20% decrease in HVPG from baseline. These so-called hemodynamic nonresponding patients have significantly higher rate of first esophageal variceal hemorrhage as compared to patients who do respond to NSBB.
International institutions that publish guidelines differ in their recommendations concerning HVPG monitoring. As a result, practice currently varies widely.
The investigators hypothesize that HVPG-directed primary prophylaxis leads to a reduction in first variceal bleeding episodes and is cost-effective in the long term.
Objective of the study:
To determine cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)-guided nonselective beta-blocker therapy as compared to standard heart rate-guided beta-blocker therapy in the primary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.
Study design:
A multi-center randomized controlled study comparing nonselective beta-blocker therapy guided by the hemodynamic response as determined by the difference in HVPG before and after starting oral nonselective beta-blockers, to standard heart rate-guided nonselective beta-blocker therapy in patients with esophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis.
Study population:
Patients with liver cirrhosis and large (>5 mm) esophageal varices without a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage.
Intervention:
-In HVPG-group: Perform baseline HVPG measurement, then start propranolol 20 mg orally twice daily (BID), increase the dose stepwise with 3 days interval to decrease the heart rate to maximum tolerated dose. After 4 weeks a second HVPG is performed.
In hemodynamic responders (who reach target decrease in HVPG) NSBB are continued until end of follow-up.
In hemodynamic nonresponders (who do not reach target decrease in HVPG), NSBB are continued and repeated endoscopic band ligation is performed with 2-4 weeks interval until complete obliteration of large varices.
-In control group: Start propranolol 20 mg BID, increase the dose stepwise with 3 days interval to maximum heart rate-guided tolerated dose.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
First variceal bleeding episodes occurring within the first two years.
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Mortality Occurrence of other cirrhosis-related complications Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma Costs of treatments Adverse effects
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with liver cirrhosis and large (>5 mm) esophageal varices
Exclusion Criteria:
- a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage
- pregnancy
- contraindications to beta-blocker therapy
- esophageal varices in the absence of liver cirrhosis
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Minneke Coenraad, Dr. | +31-71-5269111 ext *9127 | m.j.coenraad@lumc.nl |
| Belgium | |
| Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven | Not yet recruiting |
| Leuven, Belgium | |
| Contact: Frederik Nevens, Prof. dr. | |
| Netherlands | |
| Free University Medical Centre | Not yet recruiting |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Karin van Nieuwkerk, Dr. | |
| Academisch Medisch Centrum | Not yet recruiting |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Ulrich Beuers, Prof.dr. | |
| Leiden University Medical Centre | |
| Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA | |
| Erasmus Medical Centre | Not yet recruiting |
| Rotterdam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Eric Tjwa, Drs. | |
| Medical Centre Haaglanden | Not yet recruiting |
| The Hague, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Hanneke van Soest, Dr. | |
| Haga Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| The Hague, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Jan Nicolai, Dr. | |
| UMC Utrecht | Not yet recruiting |
| Utrecht, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Karel van Erpecum, Dr. | |
| Principal Investigator: | Minneke Coenraad, Dr. | Leiden University Medical Centre |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr. M.J.Coenraad, Dr., Leiden University Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01618890 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | LUMC-40226 |
| Study First Received: | June 11, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | June 12, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by Leiden University Medical Center:
|
Prevention Esophageal variceal bleeding Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Betablocker therapy |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Esophageal Diseases Esophageal and Gastric Varices Hemorrhage Liver Cirrhosis Fibrosis Varicose Veins Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Gastrointestinal Diseases Digestive System Diseases Hypertension, Portal Liver Diseases Pathologic Processes Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists Propranolol Adrenergic Antagonists Adrenergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Physiological Effects of Drugs Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses Antihypertensive Agents Vasodilator Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013