Trial record 1 of 1 for:
Study C38072/3084
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Cephalon
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries ( Cephalon )
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01508936
First received: January 3, 2012
Last updated: March 19, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of the study is to characterize the efficacy of reslizumab treatment, at a dosage of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses, in improving pulmonary function in relation to baseline blood eosinophil levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma, as assessed by the change from baseline to week 16 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Eosinophilic Asthma |
Drug: Reslizumab Drug: Matching Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A 16-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
PDGFRA-associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia
PDGFRB-associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia
MedlinePlus related topics:
Asthma
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 will be measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Standard methods for this measurement are widely accepted in clinical practice.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Change in FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 will be measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Standard methods for this measurement are widely accepted in clinical practice.
- Change in FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 will be measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Standard methods for this measurement are widely accepted in clinical practice.
- Change in FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 will be measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Standard methods for this measurement are widely accepted in clinical practice.
- Change in Percent Predicted FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the forced vital capacity (FVC).
- Change in Percent Predicted FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the FVC.
- Change in Percent Predicted FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the FVC.
- Change in Percent Predicted FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the FVC.
- Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters.
- Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters.
- Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters.
- Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters.
- Change in Forced Expiratory Flow Rate (FEF) 25-75% [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEF 25-75% is the average forced expiratory flow rate during the middle portion of expiration.
- Change in Forced Expiratory Flow Rate (FEF) 25-75% [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEF 25-75% is the average forced expiratory flow rate during the middle portion of expiration.
- Change in Forced Expiratory Flow Rate (FEF) 25-75% [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEF 25-75% is the average forced expiratory flow rate during the middle portion of expiration.
- Change in Forced Expiratory Flow Rate (FEF) 25-75% [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEF 25-75% is the average forced expiratory flow rate during the middle portion of expiration.
- Change in Beta-agonist use [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of times a beta-agonist therapy is used will be assessed using 3-day recall at scheduled visits. Patients will be asked to recall date and time of any use of beta-agonist therapy, name of medicine, and number of puffs inhaled.
- Change in Beta-agonist use [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of times a beta-agonist therapy is used will be assessed using 3-day recall at scheduled visits. Patients will be asked to recall date and time of any use of beta-agonist therapy, name of medicine, and number of puffs inhaled.
- Change in Beta-agonist use [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of times a beta-agonist therapy is used will be assessed using 3-day recall at scheduled visits. Patients will be asked to recall date and time of any use of beta-agonist therapy, name of medicine, and number of puffs inhaled.
- Change in Beta-agonist use [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of times a beta-agonist therapy is used will be assessed using 3-day recall at scheduled visits. Patients will be asked to recall date and time of any use of beta-agonist therapy, name of medicine, and number of puffs inhaled.
- Change in blood eosinophil count [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The blood eosinophil counts will be measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test. The results of the differential will be blinded.
- Change in blood eosinophil count [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The blood eosinophil counts will be measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test. The results of the differential will be blinded.
- Change in blood eosinophil count [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The blood eosinophil counts will be measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test. The results of the differential will be blinded.
- Change in blood eosinophil count [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The blood eosinophil counts will be measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test. The results of the differential will be blinded.
- Change in blood eosinophil count [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after end of treatment (EOT) or early withdrawal ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The blood eosinophil counts will be measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test. The results of the differential will be blinded.
- Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The ACQ is a validated asthma assessment tool that has been widely used. Six questions are self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item on the ACQ has a possible score ranging from 0 (indicating that the asthma is well controlled) to 6 (indicating that the asthma is severely uncontrolled), and the total score is the mean of all responses.
- Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The ACQ is a validated asthma assessment tool that has been widely used. Six questions are self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item on the ACQ has a possible score ranging from 0 (indicating that the asthma is well controlled) to 6 (indicating that the asthma is severely uncontrolled), and the total score is the mean of all responses.
- Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The ACQ is a validated asthma assessment tool that has been widely used. Six questions are self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item on the ACQ has a possible score ranging from 0 (indicating that the asthma is well controlled) to 6 (indicating that the asthma is severely uncontrolled), and the total score is the mean of all responses.
- Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The ACQ is a validated asthma assessment tool that has been widely used. Six questions are self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item on the ACQ has a possible score ranging from 0 (indicating that the asthma is well controlled) to 6 (indicating that the asthma is severely uncontrolled), and the total score is the mean of all responses.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 500 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Reslizumab |
Drug: Reslizumab
Reslizumab will be administered to patients at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).
|
| Placebo Comparator: Placebo |
Drug: Matching Placebo
Matching placebo will be administered every 4 weeks for 16 weeks.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Patients are included in the study if all of the following criteria are met:
- The patient is a man or woman, 18 through 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of asthma.
- The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5.
- At screening, the patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration.
- The patient is currently taking fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 µg daily (or equivalent). Patients' baseline asthma therapy regimens (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days before screening and continue without dosage changes throughout study.
- Female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßHCG) result for a pregnancy test at screening (serum) and baseline (urine).
- Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected).
- Written informed consent is obtained.
- The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) evaluation, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
- The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and be willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are excluded from participating in this study if 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
- The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer). The patient has other pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis).
- The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety.
- The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES).
- The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening).
- The patient has a history of use of systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (anti-immunoglobulin E [anti-IgE] mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, anti-tumor necrosis factor mAb, or omalizumab) within 6 months prior to study entry (randomization).
- The patient is currently using or has used systemic corticosteroids (includes use of oral corticosteroids) within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
- The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits.
- The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled, and thus would aggravate asthma symptoms (eg, gastroesophageal reflux disease).
- The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening.
- The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 90 days prior to screening.
- The patient has previously received reslizumab or other anti-hIL-5 mAbs (eg, mepolizumab).
- The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
- The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma.
- The patient has a history of concurrent immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or congenital immunodeficiency).
- The patient is suspected of current drug or alcohol abuse as specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria.
- The patient has presence of or suspected parasitic infestation/infection.
- Patients may not have received any live attenuated vaccine within the 12-week period before study entry.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01508936
Hide Study Locations
Hide Study LocationsLocations
| United States, Alabama | |
| Investigational Site 861 | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States | |
| Investigational Site 842 | |
| Homewood, Alabama, United States | |
| Investigational Site 887 | |
| Jasper, Alabama, United States | |
| United States, Arizona | |
| Investigational Site 809 | |
| Tucson, Arizona, United States | |
| Investigational Site 892 | |
| Tucson, Arizona, United States | |
| United States, Arkansas | |
| Investigational Site 846 | |
| Little Rock, Arkansas, United States | |
| United States, California | |
| Investigational Site 828 | |
| Anaheim, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 900 | |
| Fresno, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 862 | |
| Huntington Beach, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 852 | |
| Los Angeles, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 909 | |
| Los Angeles, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 864 | |
| Newport Beach, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 812 | |
| Rancho Mirage, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 808 | |
| Riverside, California, United States | |
| Investigational Site 804 | |
| Sacramento, California, United States | |
| United States, Colorado | |
| Investigational Site 837 | |
| Centennial, Colorado, United States | |
| Investigational Site 851 | |
| Denver, Colorado, United States | |
| Investigational Site 832 | |
| Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Investigational Site 855 | |
| Jacksonville, Florida, United States | |
| Investigational Site 865 | |
| Miami, Florida, United States | |
| Investigational Site 881 | |
| Miami, Florida, United States | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Investigational Site 805 | |
| Albany, Georgia, United States | |
| Investigational Site 870 | |
| Stockbridge, Georgia, United States | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Investigational Site 816 | |
| Chicago, Illinois, United States | |
| Investigational Site 824 | |
| Shiloh, Illinois, United States | |
| United States, Indiana | |
| Investigational Site 883 | |
| Evansville, Indiana, United States | |
| Investigational Site 878 | |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States | |
| United States, Kansas | |
| Investigational Site 820 | |
| Lenexa, Kansas, United States | |
| United States, Kentucky | |
| Investigational Site 873 | |
| Owensboro, Kentucky, United States | |
| United States, Louisiana | |
| Investigational Site 801 | |
| Lafayette, Louisiana, United States | |
| Investigational Site 877 | |
| Mandeville, Louisiana, United States | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| Investigational Site 875 | |
| White Marsh, Maryland, United States | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Investigational Site 871 | |
| Fall River, Massachusetts, United States | |
| Investigational Site 834 | |
| North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States | |
| United States, Michigan | |
| Investigational Site 889 | |
| Troy, Michigan, United States | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| Investigational Site 838 | |
| Rolla, Missouri, United States | |
| Investigational Site 818 | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States | |
| Investigational Site 841 | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States | |
| United States, New Mexico | |
| Investigational Site 857 | |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States | |
| United States, New York | |
| Investigational Site 819 | |
| Newburgh, New York, United States | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Investigational Site 844 | |
| Charlotte, North Carolina, United States | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Investigational Site 845 | |
| Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States | |
| United States, Oklahoma | |
| Investigational Site 810 | |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States | |
| United States, Oregon | |
| Investigational Site 859 | |
| Ashland, Oregon, United States | |
| Investigational Site 859 | |
| Portland, Oregon, United States | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Investigational Site 854 | |
| Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| United States, Rhode Island | |
| Investigational Site 843 | |
| Providence, Rhode Island, United States | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| Investigational Site 802 | |
| Florence, South Carolina, United States | |
| Investigational Site 814 | |
| Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States | |
| Investigational Site 821 | |
| Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States | |
| Investigational Site 829 | |
| Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| Investigational Site 850 | |
| Knoxville, Tennessee, United States | |
| Investigational Site 803 | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States | |
| United States, Texas | |
| Investigational Site 880 | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States | |
| Investigational Site 858 | |
| Dickinson, Texas, United States | |
| Investigational Site 869 | |
| Live Oak, Texas, United States | |
| Investigational Site 879 | |
| Plano, Texas, United States | |
| United States, Utah | |
| Investigational Site 847 | |
| Salt Lake City, Utah, United States | |
| Investigational Site 876 | |
| West Jordan, Utah, United States | |
| United States, Virginia | |
| Investigational Site 840 | |
| Fairfax, Virginia, United States | |
| Investigational Site 836 | |
| Richmond, Virginia, United States | |
| United States, Washington | |
| Investigational Site 867 | |
| Seattle, Washington, United States | |
| Investigational Site 833 | |
| Spokane, Washington, United States | |
| Investigational Site 904 | |
| Vancouver, Washington, United States | |
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| Investigational Site 806 | |
| Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States | |
| Investigational Site 823 | |
| LaCrosse, Wisconsin, United States | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Cephalon
Investigators
| Study Director: | Senior Director, Worldwide Clinical Research, M.D. | Sponsor's Medical Expert |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries ( Cephalon ) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01508936 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | C38072/3084 |
| Study First Received: | January 3, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | March 19, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Asthma Pulmonary Eosinophilia Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Lung Diseases Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Eosinophilia Leukocyte Disorders Hematologic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013