Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Recently a novel stimulation design was developed, called burst stimulation. In a non-placebo controlled pilot study burst stimulation seemed superior to tonic stimulation over a period extending more than 2 years, and even though an incidental finding, this design seemed capable of suppressing pain without mandatory induction of paresthesias. This permits for the first time to scientifically prove that spinal cord stimulation is better than placebo stimulation. A study was therefore initiated to find out whether spinal cord stimulation is indeed capable of suppressing neuropathic limb pain in a placebo controlled way.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Neuropathic Pain |
Procedure: dorsal column stimulator |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Burst, Tonic and Sham Spinal Cord Stimulation. A Verification of the Best Treatment Protocol |
- Visual Analogue Scales for pain back, pain limb, pain general and paresthesia [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- VAS scores for pain now, worst pain, least pain and pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 15 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tonic
5 hz stimulation at an amplitude that the patient find bearable (+/- 1.5 mA)
|
Procedure: dorsal column stimulator
test different settings of stimulation
Other Name: IPG is used by ST Jude medical together with an 88 lamitrode lead
|
|
Experimental: Sham
no stimulation, patient receive a sham stimulation (actually the IPG is not running)
|
Procedure: dorsal column stimulator
test different settings of stimulation
Other Name: IPG is used by ST Jude medical together with an 88 lamitrode lead
|
|
Experimental: burst
500 hz burst at 5 hz stimulation
|
Procedure: dorsal column stimulator
test different settings of stimulation
Other Name: IPG is used by ST Jude medical together with an 88 lamitrode lead
|
Detailed Description:
Patients receive three type of stimulation (burst, tonic and sham). We want to compare these different stimulation protocol to verify which one is the one the patient prefer the most and have the least side-effects (paresthesia)
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
All patients were selected after multidisciplinary discussion with a specialized pain physician, a psychological and psychiatric evaluation was performed to rule out psychogenic pain as well as other psychiatric morbidity contraindicating an implant. After authorization by the psychologist and psychiatrist an implant was offered.
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients enrolled in this study must meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Patients able to provide informed consent to participate in the study;
- Patient is between the age of 18 and 75;
- Patient has Failed Back Surgery Syndrome;
- Patient has a simulator implanted at the dorsal column spinal cord powered by an EON/EON Mini® internal pulse generator.
- Patient medication has remained stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline data collection;
- Patient agrees not to add or increase medication throughout the randomization trial period of the study;
- Patient is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including compliance with the treatment regimen and completion of all office visits.
Exclusion Criteria
A patient will be excluded from participation in this study if they meet any one of the following criteria:
- Patient has current evidence of any psychiatric disorder, as documented by the DSM-IV-TR criteria with psychotic characteristics;
- Patient has a history of life-threatening severe illness or is suffering from severe chronic disease other than the indication for the study;
- Patient has history of substance abuse or substance dependency in the past 6 months prior to baseline data collection;
- Patient currently participating in another clinical study;
- Patient with demand-type cardiac pacemakers, an infusion pump or any other implantable neurostimulator device except for the spinal cord stimulator under study;
- Patient is not willing to maintain current medication regimen;
- Female candidates of child bearing potential who are pregnant (confirmed by positive urine/blood pregnancy test), not using adequate contraception as determined by the investigator, or nursing (lactating) a child.
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Sven Vanneste, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Antwerp |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01486108 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | burst spinal cord stimulation |
| Study First Received: | September 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 2, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Antwerp:
|
tonic, burst and placebo stimulation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neuralgia Pain Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases |
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013