Effect of Lu AA21004 Versus Escitalopram on Sexual Functioning in Adults With Well-Treated Major Depressive Disorder
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Lu AA21004, once daily (QD), compared with escitalopram on sexual functioning.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Outcome |
Drug: Lu AA21004 Drug: Escitalopram |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Study Evaluating the Effect of Lu AA21004 vs Escitalopram on Sexual Functioning in Adults With Well-Treated Major Depressive Disorder Experiencing Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor-Induced Sexual Dysfunction |
- Change from Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire Short-Form (CSFQ-14) Total Score (Week 8). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Change from Baseline in the CSFQ-14 total score (Week 1). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 1. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Change from Baseline in the CSFQ-14 total score (Week 2). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Change from Baseline in the CSFQ-14 total score (Week 4). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Change from Baseline in the CSFQ-14 total score (Week 6). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Number of participants with a shift in the CSFQ-14 from abnormal (defined as a CSFQ-14 total score ≤41 for women and ≤47 for men) at Baseline, to normal (defined as >41 for women and >47 for men) (Week 1). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 1. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Number of participants with a shift in the CSFQ-14 from abnormal (defined as a CSFQ-14 total score ≤41 for women and ≤47 for men) at Baseline, to normal (defined as >41 for women and >47 for men) (Week 2). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Number of participants with a shift in the CSFQ-14 from abnormal (defined as a CSFQ-14 total score ≤41 for women and ≤47 for men) at Baseline, to normal (defi ned as >41 for women and >47 for men) (Week 4). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Number of participants with a shift in the CSFQ-14 from abnormal (defined as a CSFQ-14 total score ≤41 for women and ≤47 for men) at Baseline, to normal (defined as >41 for women and >47 for men) (Week 6). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
- Number of participants with a shift in the CSFQ-14 from abnormal (defined as a CSFQ-14 total score ≤41 for women and ≤47 for men) at Baseline, to normal (defined as >4 for women and >47 for men) (Week 8). [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CSFQ-14 is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), and orgasm (3 items), rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Lower scores are associated with worsened sexual functioning.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 440 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | January 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Lu AA21004 QD |
Drug: Lu AA21004
Lu AA21004 10 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 1 week, then dose adjustment to a maximum 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 7 weeks. At week 8, Lu AA21004 placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for 1 week only. |
| Active Comparator: Escitalopram QD |
Drug: Escitalopram
Escitalopram 10 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 1 week, then escitalopram dose adjustment to a maximum 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 7 weeks. At week 8, escitalopram 10 mg, capsules, capsules, orally, once daily for 1 week only. Other Name: Lexapro
|
Detailed Description:
Depression has been recognized as a chronic illness that imposes a significant burden on individuals, families and society. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is among the most important causes of disability worldwide, in both developing and developed countries.
Lu AA21004 is under codevelopment by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and H. Lundbeck A/S for the treatment of MDD and general anxiety disorder (GAD).
Treatment with antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), may be associated with sexual dysfunction, which can result in poor treatment compliance or antidepressant treatment discontinuation.
The objective of this study is to further investigate effects of Lu AA21004 in sexual functioning compared with an SSRI, escitalopram, over 8 weeks of treatment by using an objective measure, the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire Short-Form (CSFQ-14), in adult participants with well treated MDD but are experiencing SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction.
Participants will be seen weekly during the first 2 weeks of treatment and then every 2 weeks up to the end of the 8-week Treatment Period.
Participants who complete the 8-week Treatment Period will enter a 1-week, double-blind, Taper-Down Period.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 55 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant is a man or a woman aged between 18 and 55 years, inclusive, who is currently being treated with SSRI monotherapy (only citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline allowed) for at least 8 weeks, which was prescribed to treat a major depressive episode (MDE), according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria.
- The depression is currently stable; and the subject has a Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) score of ≤3.
- The participant is currently experiencing treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD; defined as a CSFQ-14 total score ≤41 for women and ≤47 for men), considered to be attributable to the current SSRI monotherapy and is suitable for a switch.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The participant has previously participated in a Lu AA21004 clinical study.
- The participant has 1 or more the following: any current psychiatric disorder other than MDD as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR; as assessed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Version 6.0.0); current or history of manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia, or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition as defined in the DSM-IV-TR; current diagnosis of alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine or caffeine) as defined in the DSM-IV-TR that has not been in sustained full remission for at least 2 years prior to Screening (subject must also have negative urine drug screen prior to Baseline); presence or history of a clinically significant neurological disorder (including epilepsy); neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington disease, etc); or any Axis II disorder that might compromise the study
- Has sexual dysfunction associated with an etiology other than SSRI treatment or current MDE (e.g., due to a medical condition, such as diabetes or hypertension, a medication, a genital anatomical deformity, or alcohol abuse)
- Nonsexually active or anticipates decreasing frequency of sexual activity (ie, sexual activity anticipated to lead to orgasm or that would normally lead to orgasm, which can include sexual intercourse, oral sex, masturbation, sexual fantasies, and/or thinking of sexual activity) during the course of the study below the level at study initiation
- Male participant with a history of premature ejaculation in the past year
- Has had major relationship changes during the preceding SSRI treatment period or plans to have major relationship changes during the course of the study
- The participant or participant's sexual partner(s) plans to initiate treatment for sexual dysfunction during the study.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Takeda Study Registration Call Center | 800-778-2860 | medicalinformation@tpna.com |
Hide Study Locations| United States, Alabama | |
| Recruiting | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States | |
| United States, Arizona | |
| Recruiting | |
| Tucson, Arizona, United States | |
| United States, California | |
| Recruiting | |
| Anaheim, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Chino, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Costa Mesa, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Encino, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Escondido, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Irvine, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Newport Beach, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Oceanside, California, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| San Diego, California, United States | |
| United States, Connecticut | |
| Recruiting | |
| Norwich, Connecticut, United States | |
| United States, District of Columbia | |
| Recruiting | |
| Washington, District of Columbia, United States | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Recruiting | |
| Coral Springs, Florida, United States | |
| Not yet recruiting | |
| Fort Myers, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Gainesville, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Jacksonville, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Lauderhill, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| North Miami, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Orlando, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Sanford, Florida, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| West Palm Beach, Florida, United States | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Recruiting | |
| Atlanta, Georgia, United States | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Recruiting | |
| Chicago, Illinois, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Joliet, Illinois, United States | |
| United States, Louisiana | |
| Recruiting | |
| Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Shreveport, Louisiana, United States | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| Recruiting | |
| Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States | |
| Not yet recruiting | |
| Towson, Maryland, United States | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Recruiting | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States | |
| United States, Mississippi | |
| Recruiting | |
| Flowood, Mississippi, United States | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| Recruiting | |
| Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States | |
| United States, New Jersey | |
| Recruiting | |
| Toms River, New Jersey, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Willingboro, New Jersey, United States | |
| United States, New Mexico | |
| Recruiting | |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States | |
| United States, New York | |
| Not yet recruiting | |
| New York, New York, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Rochester, New York, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Staten Island, New York, United States | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Recruiting | |
| Cincinatti, Ohio, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Dayton, Ohio, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Toledo, Ohio, United States | |
| United States, Oklahoma | |
| Recruiting | |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States | |
| United States, Oregon | |
| Recruiting | |
| Portland, Oregon, United States | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Recruiting | |
| Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| Recruiting | |
| Memphis, Tennessee, United States | |
| United States, Texas | |
| Recruiting | |
| Austin, Texas, United States | |
| Recruiting | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States | |
| United States, Virginia | |
| Recruiting | |
| Charlottesville, Virginia, United States | |
| United States, Washington | |
| Recruiting | |
| Seattle, Washington, United States | |
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| Recruiting | |
| Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States | |
| Canada, Alberta | |
| Recruiting | |
| Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada | |
| Canada, British Columbia | |
| Recruiting | |
| Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada | |
| Recruiting | |
| Penticton, British Columbia, Canada | |
| Canada, Nova Scotia | |
| Recruiting | |
| Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada | |
| Canada, Ontario | |
| Recruiting | |
| Burlington, Ontario, Canada | |
| Not yet recruiting | |
| Chatham, Ontario, Canada | |
| Recruiting | |
| Kingston, Ontario, Canada | |
| Recruiting | |
| Mississauga, Ontario, Canada | |
| Not yet recruiting | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada | |
| Study Director: | Senior Medical Director | Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01364649 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | LuAA21004_318, U1111-1120-3483 |
| Study First Received: | May 31, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | January 17, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration Canada: Health Canada |
Keywords provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.:
|
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological Depressive Disorder, Major Depression Antidepressive Agents Drug Therapy |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Depressive Disorder Depression Depressive Disorder, Major Mood Disorders Mental Disorders Behavioral Symptoms Antidepressive Agents Citalopram Dexetimide Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors Psychotropic Drugs Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
Antiparkinson Agents Anti-Dyskinesia Agents Parasympatholytics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Muscarinic Antagonists Cholinergic Antagonists Cholinergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors Serotonin Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013