Upper Airways in Pregnancy: Evaluation by the Acoustic Reflection Method (MAVAG)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
It is well known that airway management can be difficult during pregnancy. Increased risks for difficult intubation in pregnant women have been often reported. Thus, pregnancy is regarded as a period of high anesthesiologic risk.
Generalized weight gain is a well known factor influencing the upper airway in pregnant women. However, the modifications of the airway itself are less well documented.
The acoustic reflection method is based on the analysis of the reflection of a single transient planar wave allowing the analysis of the longitudinal cross-sectional area profile of the examined cavity. It is a noninvasive and harmless method.
The aim of the study is to evaluate by acoustic reflection method the physiological modifications of the upper airways during pregnancy.
Women enrolled in the study will undergo an acoustic recording during the first, second, and third trimester of pregnancy, as well as two days and one month after delivery. Forty pregnant women will be included in this monocentric, prospective, open labelled study.
Moreover, a single acoustic recording will be performed in 10 other pregnant women undergoing an MRI for obstetrical purpose. The estimated caliber of the upper airways by MRI and acoustic method will be compared.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Pregnancy |
Device: Acoustic reflection method |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Upper Airways in Pregnancy: Evaluation by the Acoustic Reflection Method |
- Physiological modifications during pregnancy and acoustic reflection method [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Main aim: to evaluate by acoustic reflection method the physiological modifications of the upper airways during pregnancy. Women enrolled in the study will undergo an acoustic recording during:
- the 1st, 2d, and 3d trimester of pregnancy
- two days after delivery
- one month after delivery
- MRI and acoustic reflection method [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary aim: a single acoustic recording will be proposed to 10 pregnant women undergoing an MRI for obstetrical purpose.
The estimated caliber of the upper airways by MRI and acoustic method will be compared.
| Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Physiological modifications
Pregnant women who attend the routine ultrasound control in our institution before 14 weeks of pregnancy
|
Device: Acoustic reflection method
An acoustic reflection device gives the longitudinal cross-sectional area profile along airways. It is based on the analysis of a planar acoustic wave propagating in a rigid duct connected to airway.
|
|
MRI and acoustic
Women undergoing an MRI for obstetrical purpose
|
Device: Acoustic reflection method
An acoustic reflection device gives the longitudinal cross-sectional area profile along airways. It is based on the analysis of a planar acoustic wave propagating in a rigid duct connected to airway.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Healthy pregnant women
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women who attend the routine ultrasound control in our institution before 14 weeks of pregnancy will be invited to participate in the study.
Women are eligible for the study if they are:
- healthy (no previous disease, hypertension, nor obesity),
- 18 years or more
- with a singleton live fetus at the routine ultrasound scan
- with a normal pregnancy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy complications
- Multiple pregnancy
- High risk for preterm labor
- Underlying diseases that could interfere with the results (such as pre-existing upper airway problems) and participation.
Contacts and Locations| France | |
| Armand Trousseau University Hospital | |
| Paris, France, 75012 | |
| Hôpital d'Enfants Armand Trousseau | |
| Paris, France, 75012 | |
| Study Director: | Brigitte FAUROUX, MD, PhD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris |
| Principal Investigator: | Nicolas LEBOULANGER, MD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Dr Nicolas LEBOULANGER, Dr, Club d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Pédiatrique Armand Trousseau |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01087047 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MAVAG |
| Study First Received: | March 10, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 11, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | France: Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by Club d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Pédiatrique Armand Trousseau:
|
Pregnancy Upper airways Acoustic reflection method |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013