Comparative Efficacy & Safety Study of D961H Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers With Low-dose Aspirin
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01069939
First received: February 16, 2010
Last updated: October 24, 2012
Last verified: October 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To assess the efficacy of D961H 20 mg once daily (q.d.) versus placebo in continuous treatment involving patients with a history of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers receiving daily Low-dose aspirin therapy by evaluating time from randomisation to occurrence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Prevention |
Drug: Esomeprazole Drug: Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | A Phase III Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Comparative Efficacy and Safety Study of D961H (20 mg Once Daily) Versus Placebo for Prevention of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers Associated With Continuous Low-dose Aspirin (LDA) Use |
Resource links provided by NLM:
MedlinePlus related topics:
Nausea and Vomiting
Drug Information available for:
Aspirin
Omeprazole
Omeprazole magnesium
Esomeprazole
Esomeprazole Sodium
Esomeprazole magnesium
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by AstraZeneca:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Time From Randomization to Occurrence of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers up to Data Cut-off Date for Interim Analysis. [ Time Frame: From randomisation to up to 48 weeks (Maximum follow-up period at the interim analysis) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Assessments for occurrence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers were performed every 12 weeks after randomisation. The numbers of participants with recurrence of gastric and/or duodeal ulcers were analysed every 12 weeks up to 48 weeks.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Change in Degree of Gastric Mucosal Lesion by Modified Lanza Scale From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Modified Lanza scale attributes the degree of gastric mucosal lesion, graded on a 5 point scale (0=No hemorrhage, no erosion, 1=One hemorrhage or one erosions, 2=2-10 hemorrhages or erosions, 3=11-25 hemorrhages or erosions, 4=More than 25 hemorrhages or erosions, or ulcer). Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal lesion.
- Number of Participants With Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the LA Classification up to Week 48. [ Time Frame: 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Endoscopy was conducted at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after randomisation. At the endoscopy, participants was evaluated whether they have reflux esophagitis or not.
- Change in the Severity of Epigastric Pain From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The severity of epigastric pain at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
- Change in the Severity of Heartburn From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48. [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The severity of heartburn at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
- Change in the Severity of Anorexia From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The severity of anorexia at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
- Change in the Severity of Abdomen Enlarged Feeling From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The severity of abdomen enlarged feeling at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
- Change in the Severity of Nausea and/or Vomiting From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The severity of Nausea and/or Vomiting at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
- Change in the Severity of Discomfort in the Stomach From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The severity of Discomfort in the stomach at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
- Number of Participants With Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Up to 70 weeks at the longest ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Participants who had at least adverse events (AE) which occurred after receiving study drug were counted.
| Enrollment: | 427 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily oral
|
Drug: Esomeprazole
20mg, capsule, 72 weeks
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo once daily oral
|
Drug: Placebo
Placebo, capsule, 72 weeks
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of written informed consent before starting the study-related procedures and examinations
- Patients who have the history of gastric and/or duodenal ulcer.
- A diagnosis of a chronic condition (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and ischemic cerebrovascular disorder, etc., requiring prevention of thrombosis or embolism) which requires taking the prescribed LDA during the study treatment period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having gastric or duodenal ulcer (except for ulcer scar).
- History of esophageal, gastric or duodenal surgery, except for simple closure of perforation.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01069939
Show 46 Study Locations
Show 46 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Kentaro Sugano, MD, PhD | Jichi Medical University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01069939 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D961PC00001 |
| Study First Received: | February 16, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | October 24, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | October 24, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Japan: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Korea: Food and Drug Administration Taiwan: Department of Health |
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
|
Gastric ulcer Duodenal ulcer Low-dose aspirin |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Duodenal Ulcer Ulcer Peptic Ulcer Duodenal Diseases Intestinal Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Digestive System Diseases Pathologic Processes Aspirin Omeprazole Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents |
Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Inflammatory Agents Therapeutic Uses Antirheumatic Agents Fibrinolytic Agents Fibrin Modulating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Cardiovascular Agents Hematologic Agents Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Antipyretics Central Nervous System Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013