Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Ventilation Using a Novel Full-Face Mask Versus Conventional Helmet
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this study is to compare two methods of delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV).
Since patient compliance and mechanical characteristics of the delivery devices are two fundamental variables in the success of NIV during acute respiratory failure, our hypothesis is that an improved patient-ventilator interface may improve the efficacy of therapy.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Respiratory Insufficiency Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pulmonary Edema |
Device: Helmet Device: Full-face mask |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Noninvasive Ventilation For Postoperative Acute Respiratory Failure: Comparison of Conventional Helmet With a Novel Full-Face Mask. |
- Differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio with respect to baseline (before NIV) values. [ Time Frame: 24 h ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- PaO2/FiO2 improvement at 1 h after beginning of ventilation. [ Time Frame: 1 h after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) [ Time Frame: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Arterial blood pressure and incidence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg) [ Time Frame: Up to 24 h post-enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Need for intubation [ Time Frame: Up to 24 h post-enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Intensive care unit stay [ Time Frame: Up to 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- In-hospital mortality [ Time Frame: Up to 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Device-related complications: pressure sores, skin necrosis, air leak, eye inflammation, gastric distension. [ Time Frame: Up to 24 h post-enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Patient's rating of comfort with the device. Numerical rating scale ranging from 1 (unbearable) to 5 (very good.) [ Time Frame: At 1 and 24 h post-enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Success rate of NIV as delivered with either helmet or full-face mask. Success is defined as ≥50 mmHg improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio. [ Time Frame: 24 h from initiation of therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2008 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Helmet
Patients in this group will receive continuous positive airway pressure delivered through a helmet connected to a high-flow reservoir system.
|
Device: Helmet
Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Mask
Patients in this group will receive continuous positive-airway pressure delivered through a novel full-face mask connected to a high-flow system. Expiratory pressure will be maintained using an expiratory valve connected to a T-tube.
|
Device: Full-face mask
Continuous positive airway pressure for up to 24 h. Initial pressure will be 5 cmH2O, and will be increased by 2-3 cmH2O up to 10 cmH2O, in order to maintain SpO2 ≥90%.
Other Names:
|
Hide Detailed DescriptionDetailed Description:
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the delivery of ventilatory support without the need for an invasive artificial airway. The use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in acute respiratory failure has been steadily increasing for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Noninvasive ventilation can often eliminate the need for intubation or tracheostomy and preserve normal swallowing, speech, and cough mechanisms. Discomfort of the device is one of the reason for the failure of NIV (30-40% of the cases).
The Novastar oro-nasal mask (Dräger Medical, Lubeck, Germany) is a flexible, transparent mask shell with a fine silicone gel cushion which adapts to the wearer's face. The pliable ring embedded inside the flexible clear shell allows the mask to be bent and adjusted to fit the patient's face (customized fit), while minimizing leakages. The mask has magnetic, self aligning clips for capture and secure fastening of the mask headgear. The magnetic clips are self-aligning.
The transparent flexible helmet for NIV (Rüsch 4-Vent, Teleflex Medical Europe, Athlone, Ireland) is fixed with two straps passing through each armpit. The braces are protected by hydrocolloid strips to prevent axillary decubitus. It is important to chose the right size of the helmet to avoid air leakages in the neck region. Two filters in the in- and expiratory way are necessary to reduce noise.
Different devices may lead to varying degrees of discomfort and, thus, improve compliance. Better tolerability of NIV may improve its efficacy. Therefore, we planned this randomized controlled trial to investigate whether different modalities of NIV delivery may affect therapeutical efficacy.
No randomized trials have compared helmets to the NOVASTAR full-face masks. This randomized, controlled study aims to assess whether the new full face mask improves gas exchange in patients admitted to ICU because of acute postoperative respiratory failure.
METHODS
Patients meeting criteria for NIV cycles will be enrolled in this trial. Informed written consent requirements were waived by the Internal Review Board since enrollment criteria meet common clinical guidelines and the two devices are both widely available (and approved for this indication).
Enrollment criteria are:
- Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
- PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
- Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing
Patients will be excluded if:
- Refusing NIV
- Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery
Upon enrolment, patients will be randomized to receive NIV via one of the two available interfaces. In group H (for "helmet"), the continuous positive pressure is obtained by a high influx of fresh gases (air + oxygen) flowing through a high-compliance reservoir, with a positive end-expiratory pressure valve limiting outflow. In the M ("oral-nasal mask") group the same flow scheme is obtained using a T-tube attached to the mask. Patients' heads will be elevated to about 45° in both groups.
In both groups continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will be instituted at 5 cmH2O. Pressure will be increased by increments of 2-3 cmH2O until a maximum of 10 cmH2O in order to reach a peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% with the lowest FiO2 possible.
Noninvasive ventilation will be ideally maintained for up to 24 h. Patients will be asked to wear the helmet/mask as long as possible. During ventilation-free periods, which will be maintained as short as possible, patients will receive 50% oxygen supplementation. The criteria for success of therapy and discontinuation of NIV will be a reversal of all criteria listed above for enrollment.
Criteria for NIV failure and subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation will be:
- Coma (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or inability to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Intolerance to the interface
- Patient's inability to mobilize secretions
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio <140 mmHg after ≥1 h of ventilation
MAIN ENDPOINT AND SAMPLE SIZE
Arterial blood gas analyses will be performed upon enrollment, after 1 h, and after 24 h from enrollment. The null hypothesis of the study is that there will be no difference in the mean PaO2/FiO2 values between the two groups at 24 h. We will consider as clinically and statistically significant a difference of ≥50±60 mmHg between the groups.
A total of 50 patients will be enrolled. Sample size calculations are based on the assumption of a 5% risk of type I error and a 20% risk of type II error, while accounting for a 10-15% attrition rate.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 89 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ongoing or recent history of respiratory failure (either primary or secondary)
- PaO2 <60 mmHg if breathing room air or PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg if receiving supplemental oxygen
- Acute dyspnea with respiratory rate >25 bpm and accessory muscle recruitment and/or paradoxical abdominal breathing
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusing noninvasive ventilation
- Comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale <8) or unable to maintain a patent airway
- Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg on recruitment, or receiving vasopressors/inotropes; ongoing angina/myocardial infarction; newly-developed arrhythmia with hemodynamic impact)
- Having recently (≤2 weeks) undergone oesophageal or upper respiratory tract surgery
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Maria Barbagallo, MD | +39-052-170-3567 | mbarbagallo@ao.pr.it |
| Italy | |
| University and Hospital of Parma (Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma) | Recruiting |
| Parma, PR, Italy, 43126 | |
| Contact: Marco Baciarello, MD +39-052-103-3477 mbaciarello@parmanesthesia.com | |
| Sub-Investigator: Marco Baciarello, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Simone Di Cianni, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Maria Rossi, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Giada Maspero, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: Maria Barbagallo, MD | |
| Study Chair: | Guido Fanelli, MD | Dept. of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Parma, Italy |
| Principal Investigator: | Maria Barbagallo, MD | UO II Anestesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Antalgica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Maria Barbagallo, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00944437 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ICU-ICU-02 |
| Study First Received: | July 21, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | July 22, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ethics Committee Italy: National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials - Ministry of Health Italy: The Italian Medicines Agency |
Keywords provided by University of Parma:
|
Ventilation, Mechanical Positive-Pressure Respiration Continuous Positive Airway Pressure |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Edema Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Edema Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult Acute Lung Injury |
Respiratory Insufficiency Lung Diseases, Obstructive Signs and Symptoms Respiratory Tract Diseases Infant, Premature, Diseases Infant, Newborn, Diseases Lung Injury |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013