Comparison of 50% Tilt and Tuned Waveforms in Single-Coil Active Can Configuration (PROMISE)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the defibrillation efficacy between the 50/50% tilt biphasic waveform and the Tuned biphasic waveform in a single coil active can configuration.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Sudden Cardiac Death |
Device: ICD/ CRT-D |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Prospective Comparison of 50/50% Tilt and Tuned Defibrillation Waveforms in a Single Coil Active Can Configuration |
- True DFTs in fixed tilt and tuned waveforms obtained in volts (V) [ Time Frame: Implant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- True DFTs in fixed tilt and tuned waveforms obtained in joules (J) [ Time Frame: Implant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 77 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform
ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform
|
Device: ICD/ CRT-D
Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.
|
|
Active Comparator: ICD shocks programmed to Fixed Tilt Waveform
ICD shocks programmed to Fixed Tilt Waveform
|
Device: ICD/ CRT-D
Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.
|
Detailed Description:
There has been one prospective study that found some benefit of using tuned waveforms over 50/50% tilt waveforms.11 Other studies have failed to show much change in defibrillation efficacy with different duration biphasic waveforms. A vast majority of patients in these studies were tested with dual coil leads. Although dual coil leads can lower defibrillation thresholds, it is known that dual coil leads can make the lead extraction difficult, lead to venous obstruction and are more prone to failure. Results from a recent study showed that that a single coil configuration is adequate in a vast majority of patients when DFT testing was performed with tuned waveforms. This makes the use of single-coil leads during ICD/ CRT-D implants an attractive option.
Theoretical analysis has shown that difference between the tuned and 50% tilt waveforms is amplified at high impedance levels with tuned waveforms being superior (unpublished). Accordingly, this study has been designed to prospectively compare the DFT estimates with tuned and 50% tilt waveforms in left-sided, active pectoral defibrillation lead systems when the SVC coil has been turned OFF or is not part of the shocking circuit.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient meets standard indication for an ICD/ CRT-D and will be implanted with an FDA approved SJM ICD/ CRT-D and compatible defibrillation lead system in the left pectoral region.
- Patient is able to tolerate DFT testing.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient has the pulse generator on the right side.
- Patient is pregnant.
- Patient is less than 18 years old.
- SVC coil was turned ON during DFT testing
Contacts and Locations| United States, South Carolina | |
| Michael Gold | |
| Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael Gold, MD, PhD | Medical University of South Carolina |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | St. Jude Medical |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00874445 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CRD 475 |
| Study First Received: | March 31, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | December 11, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Death, Sudden, Cardiac Death Heart Arrest Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Death, Sudden Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013