Combination Chemotherapy and Cetuximab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known whether giving combination chemotherapy together with intermittent cetuximab is more effective than combination chemotherapy given together with continuous cetuximab in treating colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving combination chemotherapy together with intermittent cetuximab to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy given together with continuous cetuximab as first-line therapy in treating patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Colorectal Cancer |
Biological: cetuximab Drug: capecitabine Drug: fluorouracil Drug: leucovorin calcium Drug: oxaliplatin Other: immunohistochemistry staining method Other: laboratory biomarker analysis |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Two-arm Phase II Randomised Trial of Intermittent Chemotherapy Plus Continuous Cetuximab and of Intermittent Chemotherapy Plus Intermittent Cetuximab in First Line Treatment of Patients With K-ras-normal (Wild-type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
- Failure-free survival at 10 months [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Safety of cetuximab reintroduction, in terms of risk of grade 3-4 allergic reactions [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Proportion of patients achieving disease control (complete response plus partial response plus stable disease) at 24 weeks [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Progression-free survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Response rates at 12, 24, and 36 weeks [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Toxicity of each treatment regimen by NCI CTCAE v3.0 [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 169 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | June 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: D
Intermittent chemotherapy plus intermittent cetuximab treatment comprising 12 weeks of chemotherapy plus cetuximab followed by a period off all therapy, with reintroduction of the same chemotherapy and cetuximab regimen for a further 12 weeks after initial progression off treatment
|
Biological: cetuximab Drug: capecitabine Drug: fluorouracil Drug: leucovorin calcium Drug: oxaliplatin Other: immunohistochemistry staining method Other: laboratory biomarker analysis |
|
Experimental: E
Intermittent chemotherapy plus continuous cetuximab treatment comprising 12 weeks of chemotherapy plus cetuximab followed by a period of withdrawal of the chemotherapy, but continued weekly cetuximab monotherapy (maintenance cetuximab), with reintroduction of the same chemotherapy regimen to the cetuximab for a further 12 weeks after initial progression off chemotherapy treatment
|
Biological: cetuximab Drug: capecitabine Drug: fluorouracil Drug: leucovorin calcium Drug: oxaliplatin Other: immunohistochemistry staining method Other: laboratory biomarker analysis |
Hide Detailed DescriptionDetailed Description:
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare the activity, in terms of failure-free survival, of patients with K-ras-normal (wild type) advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer treated with intermittent combination chemotherapy comprising oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (OxMdG) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) and intermittent vs continuous cetuximab as first-line therapy.
- To compare the safety and feasibility of these regimens in these patients.
Secondary
- To compare the safety of cetuximab reintroduction, in terms of frequency of grade 3-4 allergic reactions in these patients.
- To compare improvement in disease control (i.e., complete response plus partial response plus stable disease) at 24 weeks in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare overall and progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare response rates at 12, 24, and 36 weeks in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomised to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I (intermittent chemotherapy and intermittent cetuximab): Patients receive 1 of the following combination chemotherapy and cetuximab regimens:
- OxMdG: Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours and leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses (12 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- XELOX (for patients with line-related problems): Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-15 (28 doses). Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 4 courses (12 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of 12 weeks of study therapy, patients with disease progression are removed from study. Patients with stable or responding disease stop treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab and undergo clinical evaluation at least every 6 weeks until disease progression or clinical deterioration. Upon evidence of disease progression or clinical deterioration, patients restart treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab as before and continue to alternate 12 weeks of treatment with treatment breaks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression during study therapy stop treatment and proceed to second-line therapy or best supportive care.
- Arm II (intermittent chemotherapy and continuous cetuximab): Patients receive OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab for 12 weeks as in arm I. Patients with disease progression after 12 weeks of study therapy are removed from study. Patients with stable or responding disease* after 12 weeks of study therapy stop treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and continue treatment with cetuximab weekly as monotherapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo clinical evaluation as in arm I. Upon progression, patients restart treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and continue cetuximab, as before, alternating 12 weeks of combined OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab therapy with cetuximab monotherapy. Patients with disease progression during study therapy stop treatment and proceed to second-line therapy as in arm I.
Previously collected tumor tissue samples are obtained at baseline and analyzed by IHC for EGFR status of tumor.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, defined by 1 of the following:
- Prior or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum with clinical or radiological evidence of advanced and/or metastatic disease
- Histologically and cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical and/or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor
- Unidimensionally measurable disease by RECIST criteria
Inoperable metastatic or locoregional disease
Potentially resectable liver metastases allowed provided the following criteria are met:
- Fewer than 4 unilobar liver metastases, each < 4 cm in size and without major vascular involvement
- No combination chemotherapy allowed prior to the planned resection of operable liver metastases
- No confirmed K-ras mutation of tumor after screening
- No brain metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- WHO performance status 0-2
- Must be considered fit to undergo combination chemotherapy
- ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times ULN
- AST or ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 50mL/min OR glomerular filtration rate ≥ 50 mL/min
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No severe uncontrolled concurrent medical illness (including poorly controlled angina or myocardial infarction within the past 12 weeks) likely to interfere with protocol treatments
- No psychiatric or neurological condition that would preclude study compliance with oral medication or giving informed consent
- No partial or complete bowel obstruction
- No preexisting neuropathy > grade 1
- No prior or current malignant disease which, in the judgement of the treating investigator, is likely to interfere with COIN-B treatment or assessment of response
- No patients with known hypersensitivity reactions to any of the components of the study treatments
- No proven dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (DPD) or personal or family history of DPD
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior systemic palliative chemotherapy for metastatic disease
- No prior oxaliplatin
- More than 1 month since prior adjuvant chemotherapy comprising fluorouracil (with or without leucovorin calcium), capecitabine, or irinotecan hydrochloride
- More than 1 month since prior chemoradiotherapy comprising fluorouracil (with or without leucovorin calcium) or capecitabine for rectal cancer
- No ongoing requirement for contraindicated concurrent medication
- No concurrent enrollment in any type of study other than observational studies
Contacts and Locations| Cyprus | |
| Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre | |
| Nicosia, Cyprus | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Bradford Royal Infirmary | |
| Bradford, England, United Kingdom, BD9 6RJ | |
| Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital | |
| Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom, GL53 7AN | |
| Essex County Hospital | |
| Colchester, England, United Kingdom, C03 3NB | |
| Dorset County Hospital | |
| Dorchester, England, United Kingdom, DT1 2JY | |
| St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital | |
| Guildford, England, United Kingdom, GU2 7XX | |
| St. Mary's Hospital | |
| London, England, United Kingdom, W2 1NY | |
| Hammersmith Hospital | |
| London, England, United Kingdom, W12 OHS | |
| Churchill Hospital | |
| Oxford, England, United Kingdom, OX3 7LJ | |
| Peterborough Hospitals Trust | |
| Peterborough, England, United Kingdom, PE3 6DA | |
| University Hospital of North Staffordshire | |
| Stoke-On-Trent, England, United Kingdom, ST4 7LN | |
| Singleton Hospital | |
| Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom, SA2 8QA | |
| Royal United Hospital | |
| Bath, United Kingdom | |
| Royal Bournemouth Hospital | |
| Bournemouth, United Kingdom | |
| Addenbrookes Hospital | |
| Cambridge, United Kingdom | |
| Darent Valley Hospital | |
| Dartford, United Kingdom | |
| Hereford County Hospital | |
| Hereford, United Kingdom | |
| Charing Cross Hospital | |
| London, United Kingdom | |
| Guys and St Thomas' hospitals | |
| London, United Kingdom | |
| Dorset Cancer Centre, Poole Hospital | |
| Poole, United Kingdom | |
| Weston Park | |
| Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2SJ | |
| Southport and Ormskirk | |
| Southport, United Kingdom | |
| St Helens and Whiston hospitals | |
| St Helens, United Kingdom | |
| Warrington and Halton Hospitals | |
| Warrington, United Kingdom | |
| Worcestershire Royal Hospital | |
| Worcester, United Kingdom | |
| Principal Investigator: | Harpreet S. Wasan | Hammersmith Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Cheryl Pugh, Trial Manager, Medical Research Council |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00640081 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CDR0000589635, MRC-CTU-COIN-B/CR11, EUDRACT:2006-003049-17, ISRCTN38375681, EU-20828, MERCK-MRC-CTU-COIN-B/CR11 |
| Study First Received: | March 19, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | February 23, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency Cyprus: National Bioethics Committee of Cyprus |
Keywords provided by Medical Research Council:
|
adenocarcinoma of the colon stage IV colon cancer adenocarcinoma of the rectum stage IV rectal cancer |
stage III colon cancer stage III rectal cancer recurrent colon cancer recurrent rectal cancer |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colorectal Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases Rectal Diseases Fluorouracil Capecitabine Oxaliplatin Cetuximab |
Leucovorin Levoleucovorin Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Vitamin B Complex Vitamins Micronutrients Growth Substances |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013