Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ISIS 301012 (Mipomersen) in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (RADICHOL 1)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mipomersen (ISIS 301012) in subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia on lipid-lowering therapy.
This study consisted of a 26-week treatment period and a 24-week post-treatment follow-up period. Following treatment and Week 28 evaluations, participants could elect to enroll in an open-label extension study (301012-CS6; NCT00694109). Participants who were not eligible or elected not to enroll in the open-label extension study or who discontinued during the 28-week treatment period were followed in this study for 24 weeks from administration of the last dose of study drug.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors Hypercholesterolemia, Autosomal Dominant Hyperlipidemias Metabolic Diseases Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II Metabolism, Inborn Errors Genetic Diseases, Inborn Infant, Newborn, Diseases Metabolic Disorder Congenital Abnormalities Hypercholesterolemia Hyperlipoproteinemias Dyslipidemias Lipid Metabolism Disorders |
Drug: mipomersen Drug: Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen as Add-on Therapy in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Subjects |
- Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]LDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. For patients with triglycerides <400 mg/dL, LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's calculation; and for patients with triglycerides >=400 mg/dL, LDL-C was directly measured by the central laboratory using ultracentrifugation. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. If the Study Day 1 and screening LDL-C values were >12% different (relative to the maximum value), then the screening value was not used, because the Study Day 1 value represents the best estimate of the patient's condition at the beginning of study drug administration. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- LDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Primary Efficacy Time Point [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Apo-B was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Apo-B at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total cholesterol was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Total Cholesterol at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Non-HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Non-HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Triglycerides were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Triglycerides at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lipoprotein(a) was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Lipoprotein(a) at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]VLDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- VLDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Change From Baseline in Ratio of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]LDL-C and HDL-C were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Apo-A1 was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Apo-A1 at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
| Enrollment: | 51 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mipomersen
Participants received mipomersen 200 mg as a subcutaneous injection once a week for 26 weeks.
|
Drug: mipomersen
200 mg mipomersen administered once a week for 26 weeks as a 1 mL subcutaneous injection. Subjects weighing less than 50 kg received a lower dose of 160 mg (0.8mL) mipomersen.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received placebo as a subcutaneous injection once a week for 26 weeks.
|
Drug: Placebo
1 mL subcutaneous injection once a week for 26 weeks. Subjects weighing less than 50 kg received 0.8 mL subcutaneous injection.
Other Name: placebo
|
Detailed Description:
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism characterized by markedly elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL), premature onset of atherosclerosis and development of xanthomata. Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have a severe disease that presents in childhood with total cholesterol typically in the 650 to 1000 mg/dL range.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which consisted of a 4-week screening period, 26 weeks of treatment, and a 24-week post- treatment follow-up period (with the exception of patients who enrolled in the open-label extension study, Study 301012-CS6; NCT00694109). Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 200 mg mipomersen or matching volume placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections weekly. Patients who weighed <50 kg received a lower dose of 160 mg mipomersen or matching volume of placebo SC injections weekly. Patients were to have been on a stable (>=12 weeks) regimen of allowed lipid-lowering therapies at screening, and were required to remain on the same dose and regimen throughout the study.
Patients returned to the study center for clinical evaluation every other week during the first 4 weeks of treatment, once every 4 to 5 weeks for the remainder of the treatment period, and monthly during the post-treatment evaluation (follow-up) period. The primary endpoint assessment was at Week 28. Following treatment and Week 28 evaluations, eligible patients who tolerated the study drug could elect to enroll in the open-label extension study (Study 301012-CS6; NCT00694109). Patients who did not participate in the open-label extension study were required to return to the study center for clinical evaluation at least twice during the post-treatment follow-up period, including an end-of-study termination visit at the end of this 24-week period.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
- Stable lipid-lowering therapy for 12 weeks
- Stable weight for 6 weeks
- Stable low fat diet for 8 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, blood disorders, cancer, or digestive problems
Contacts and Locations| United States, North Carolina | |
| Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204 | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212 | |
| Brazil | |
| Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403-000 | |
| Canada, Quebec | |
| Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H 5H6 | |
| Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G2 | |
| Singapore | |
| Mistri Wing, Singapore, 168752 | |
| South Africa | |
| Observatory, South Africa, 7925 | |
| Parktown, South Africa, 2193 | |
| Taiwan | |
| Taipei, Taiwan, 11217 | |
| United Kingdom | |
| London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3BG | |
| Study Director: | Medical Monitor | Genzyme |
More Information
No publications provided by Genzyme
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Genzyme |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00607373 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 301012CS5, 2005-003449-15 |
| Study First Received: | January 22, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | February 15, 2013 |
| Last Updated: | May 30, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration Canada: Health Canada United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency South Africa: Medicines Control Council Singapore: Health Sciences Authority Taiwan: Department of Health Brazil: National Health Surveillance Agency |
Keywords provided by Genzyme:
|
Apolipoprotein B Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia LDL-receptor gene |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Congenital Abnormalities Genetic Diseases, Inborn Hypercholesterolemia Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II Hyperlipidemias Hyperlipoproteinemias |
Infant, Newborn, Diseases Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors Metabolic Diseases Metabolism, Inborn Errors Lipid Metabolism Disorders Dyslipidemias |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013