Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Outcomes in a Comparison of Manual Penetrating Keratoplasty and the IntraLase® Enabled Keratoplasty
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
First Received: November 29, 2007   Last Updated: November 30, 2007   History of Changes
Sponsor: Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba
Information provided by: Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00566605
  Purpose

To compare the early visual results and postoperative recovery between two groups of keratoconic patients - one group having undergone a traditional, mechanical vacuum trephine procedure while the second group underwent femtosecond-enabled penetrating keratoplasty.


Condition Intervention Phase
Keratoconus
Procedure: Penetrating keratoplasty with IntraLase
Procedure: Penetrating keratoplasty with vacuum trephine
Phase I

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Visual Outcomes in a Comparison of Manual Penetrating Keratoplasty and the IntraLase® Enabled Keratoplasty

Further study details as provided by Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Visual acuity [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Pachimetry, Microscopy, Corneal topography [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Enrollment: 60
Study Start Date: August 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: August 2008
Arms Assigned Interventions
Group 1: Active Comparator Procedure: Penetrating keratoplasty with IntraLase
penetrating keratoplasty with femtosecond laser shaped incisions- IntraLase TM (IntraLase Enabled Keratoplasty [IEK])
Group 2: Active Comparator Procedure: Penetrating keratoplasty with vacuum trephine
Group 2 - penetrating keratoplasty with vacuum trephine

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years old, with keratoconus and corneal transplant indication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included different ocular pathology and a potential visual acuity of less than 20/40
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00566605

Locations
Brazil, Sao Paulo
Sorocaba Eye Bank - HOSBOS
Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Elissandro M Silva, Lindoso Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: HOSBOS ( Luciene Barbosa de Sousa )
Study ID Numbers: 466.07
Study First Received: November 29, 2007
Last Updated: November 30, 2007
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00566605     History of Changes
Health Authority: Brazil:Anvisa

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Corneal Diseases
Eye Diseases
Keratoconus

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on November 27, 2009