Primary Outcome Measures:
- Mean change from baseline (visit 1 until visit 2) to endpoint (after visit 2 until visit 3) in the freezing of gait questionnaire score. [ Time Frame: 2-3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Mean change in time to perform the timed gait test with versus without the laser feature from visit 1 to visit 3. [ Time Frame: 2-3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change in falls per month for the period between visit 1 and visit 2 (without laser) compared to the period between visit 2 and visit 3 (with the laser). [ Time Frame: 2-3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Comparison of the changes in falls and the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire scores for group 1 versus group 2 based on the change from the first month after baseline visit to the second month after the baseline visit. [ Time Frame: 2-3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Freezing of gait is a significant clinical problem in Parkinson's disease (PD). It interferes with daily functioning and quality of life and often results in falls that potentially can inflict serious injury. In recent years, much more attention has been focused on the clinical characteristics of gait freezing, the severity of falls that can result, and the use of visual cues as a possible treatment in order to understand the implications of episodic freezing. Few clinical studies have been done to confirm the clinical observations to date. The laser cane is a device that has been used and prescribed in movement disorder centers as the only form of treatment for freezing of gait. Although it has been shown to be effective in many cases, there is no published data to support what has been observed in the clinic. The proposed study seeks to clarify unanswered questions regarding the laser cane and its efficacy in aiding with episodic gait freezing and falls.