Study of Cetuximab, Oxaliplatin, 5-FU/LV Versus Oxaliplatin, 5-FU/LV in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic, EGFR-Positive Colorectal Cancer
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ImClone LLC
Collaborator:
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Information provided by:
ImClone LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00061815
First received: June 4, 2003
Last updated: April 8, 2010
Last verified: April 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival in patients with previously-treated metastatic, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) and cetuximab with FOLFOX4 alone.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Colorectal Cancer |
Biological: cetuximab Drug: oxaliplatin Drug: leucovorin Drug: 5-fluorouracil |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase 3 Randomized Multicenter Study of Cetuximab, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs. Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Subjects With Previously Treated Metastatic, EGFR-Positive Colorectal Carcinoma |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Drug Information available for:
Fluorouracil
Leucovorin calcium
Oxaliplatin
Levoleucovorin
Cetuximab
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by ImClone LLC:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Compare overall survival in subjects with previously-treated metastatic, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and LV (FOLFOX4) and cetuximab with FOLFOX4 alone. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Compare the response rates between the two treatment arms. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compare progression-free survival between the two treatment arms. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Duration of response within each treatment arm. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Time to response within each treatment arm. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compare the safety profiles between the two treatment arms. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Compare the quality of life (QOL)between the two treatment arms. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Conduct an economic assessment comparing healthcare resource utilization between the two treatment arms. [ Time Frame: Every six weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 102 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2005 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2004 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
Experimental: Cetuximab+FOLFOX4
|
Biological: cetuximab
400 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: Erbitux™
Drug: oxaliplatin
85 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: Eloxatin®
Drug: leucovorin
200 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: Wellcovorin®
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
400 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: 5-FU
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
600 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: 5-FU
Biological: cetuximab
250 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: Erbitux™
|
Active Comparator: FOLFOX4.
|
Drug: oxaliplatin
85 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: Eloxatin®
Drug: leucovorin
200 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: Wellcovorin®
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
400 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: 5-FU
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
600 mg/m2 IV
Other Name: 5-FU
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Documented colorectal cancer which is EGFR-positive and is metastatic.
- Prior irinotecan, alone or in combination, as first-line treatment of metastatic disease.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A serious uncontrolled medical disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy.
- Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
- Known metastases in the central nervous system.
- Symptomatic sensory or peripheral neuropathy.
- More than one prior chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
- Prior oxaliplatin therapy.
- Prior cetuximab or other therapy which targets the EGF pathway.
- Prior chimerized or murine monoclonal antibody therapy.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00061815
Hide Study Locations
Hide Study LocationsLocations
| United States, Arkansas | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Springdale, Arkansas, United States, 72764 | |
| United States, California | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Gilroy, California, United States, 95020 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Greenbrae, California, United States, 94904 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Orange, California, United States, 92868 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Pomona, California, United States, 91767 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| San Diego, California, United States, 92120 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Vista, California, United States, 92083 | |
| United States, Connecticut | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06105 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Norwalk, Connecticut, United States, 06856 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06902 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708 | |
| United States, Florida | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33435 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Leesburg, Florida, United States, 34748 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613 | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201 | |
| United States, Kentucky | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202 | |
| United States, Louisiana | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809 | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21225 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Clinton, Maryland, United States, 20735 | |
| United States, Michigan | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| St. Joseph, Michigan, United States, 49085 | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64131 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Rolla, Missouri, United States, 65401 | |
| United States, New Jersey | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601 | |
| United States, New York | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Armonk, New York, United States, 10504 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11235 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| East Setauket, New York, United States, 11733 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103 | |
| United States, North Dakota | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Bismarck, North Dakota, United States, 58501 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107 | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29406 | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37920 | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203 | |
| United States, Utah | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Ogden, Utah, United States, 84403 | |
| United States, Virginia | |
| ImClone Investigational Site | |
| Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23230 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
ImClone LLC
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Investigators
| Study Chair: | E-mail: ClinicalTrials@ ImClone.com | ImClone LLC |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Chief Medical Officer, ImClone LLC |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00061815 History of Changes |
| Obsolete Identifiers: | NCT00065520 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CA225-014 |
| Study First Received: | June 4, 2003 |
| Last Updated: | April 8, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colorectal Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases Rectal Diseases Fluorouracil Oxaliplatin Cetuximab Leucovorin |
Levoleucovorin Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Vitamin B Complex Vitamins Micronutrients Growth Substances Antidotes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013