|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00032565 |
Purpose
Patients in 'parent' cooperative studies projects are interviewed about their experiences in the informed consent process.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Healthy Informed Consent |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Cross-Sectional |
| Official Title: | CSP #476, Enhancing Quality of Informed Consent (EQUIC-SM) Self-Monitoring |
| Enrollment: | 836 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2002 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | July 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
|
1
No intervention. Telephone interview.
|
Intervention: Self-Monitoring Questionnaire (a questionnaire relating to the process of IC self-administered by study coordinators) and evaluation of the informed consent process using the Brief Informed Consent Evaluation Protocol (BICEP) developed during the EQUIC-DP phase.
Primary Hypothesis: We hypothesize that by focusing attention on what may have become a routinized process, the quality of the IC encounter will be enhanced. We will evaluate the success of this intervention by having the patient-subject complete a telephone questionnaire, the BICEP (Brief Informed Consent Evaluation Protocol), after the IC process is completed.
Primary Outcomes: The quality of the informed consent process, as measured by the BICEP (Brief Informed Consent Evaluation Protocol). The BICEP also offers a method to certify informed consent in routine use.
Study Abstract: Enhancing the Quality of Informed Consent Self-Monitoring (EQUIC-SM) is one component of a VA Cooperative Studies Program-wide initiative on informed consent (EQUIC). Its objective is the field testing and iterative improvement of one intervention in the informed consent (IC) process, self monitoring. Self-monitoring involves having the person obtaining IC complete a Self-Monitoring Questionnaire, or SMQ after the IC encounter with a patient-subject being recruited for a participating study. We conceive of the SMQ as an activation device which prompts the person obtaining IC to monitor how he/she conducts the IC encounter. RESEARCH DESIGN: EQUIC-SM will be conducted in conjunction with participating clinical trials of the VA CSP at multiple VAs throughout the country. Patient-subjects will be recruited from among participants in these parent studies. Parent studies will be randomized to SM protocol or to control sites.
METHODOLOGY: Patient-subjects will be informed about EQUIC-SM at the time that they are first presented with information about the parent study. The person obtaining consent will use a scripted description of EQUIC-SM. If the subject agrees, verbal consent for EQUIC-SM will be obtained. The same parent study informed consent process will be used for both the SM protocol and control arms of EQUIC-SM; however in the SM protocol arm, the person obtaining consent will complete the SMQ after the IC process. In both arms, patient-subjects will be asked to complete the BICEP interview after the parent study IC process is completed. FINDINGS: Investigators will use the results of EQUIC-SM to assess the value of the self-monitoring technique in improving the quality of informed consent. The premise is that focusing the attention of the person obtaining informed consent on the IC process will enhance the quality of the IC encounter, and thus of the informed consent obtained.
SIGNIFICANCE: Practitioners of clinical trials have a responsibility to ensure that patients participation in research be informed and voluntary. This responsibility implies that we should strive continuously to improve the effectiveness of methods for informing prospective research volunteers about experimental studies, thereby enhancing the protection of their interests. If the self-monitoring technique tested in EQUIC-SM proves to enhance the quality of informed consent, this technique may be adapted for wider use in conducting clinical trials, thus representing an important step towards this goal.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Patients in various VA clinics
Inclusion Criteria:
Depends on 'parent' study
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations
Hide Study Locations| United States, Alabama | |
| VA Medical Center, Birmingham | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233 | |
| United States, Arkansas | |
| Central Arkansas VHS Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Ctr, Little Rock | |
| No. Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72114-1706 | |
| United States, California | |
| VA Palo Alto Health Care System | |
| Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1207 | |
| VA Medical Center, Loma Linda | |
| Loma Linda, California, United States, 92357 | |
| United States, Connecticut | |
| VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven) | |
| West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516 | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur | |
| Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033 | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital | |
| Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141-5000 | |
| United States, Kentucky | |
| VA Medical Center, Lexington | |
| Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40502 | |
| United States, Louisiana | |
| Southeast Veterans Healthcare System, New Orleans | |
| New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112 | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore | |
| Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201 | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| VA Medical Center, Jamaica Plain Campus | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130 | |
| VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Campus | |
| Brockton, Massachusetts, United States, 02301 | |
| United States, Michigan | |
| John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit | |
| Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201 | |
| United States, Minnesota | |
| VA Medical Center, Minneapolis | |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417 | |
| United States, New York | |
| VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo | |
| Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215 | |
| VA Medical Center, Northport | |
| Northport, New York, United States, 11768 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| VA Medical Center, Durham | |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705 | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| VA Medical Center, Cincinnati | |
| Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| VA Medical Center, Philadelphia | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104 | |
| United States, Texas | |
| VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216 | |
| Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152) | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| United States, Virginia | |
| Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center | |
| Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249 | |
| Study Chair: | Philip Lavori, PhD | VA Palo Alto Health Care System |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Department of Veterans Affairs ( Lavori, Philip - Study Chair ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | 476SM |
| Study First Received: | March 27, 2002 |
| Last Updated: | February 25, 2009 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00032565 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |