Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Melphalan, Total-Body Irradiation, and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
First Received: November 1, 1999   Last Updated: February 6, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsor: Southwest Oncology Group
Collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Information provided by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002548
  Purpose

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage cancer cells. Combining chemotherapy and radiation therapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy and radiation therapy and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of melphalan, total-body irradiation, and peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have previously untreated multiple myeloma.


Condition Intervention Phase
Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
Biological: recombinant interferon alfa
Drug: carmustine
Drug: cyclophosphamide
Drug: dexamethasone
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Drug: melphalan
Drug: prednisone
Drug: vincristine sulfate
Procedure: allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
Procedure: autologous bone marrow transplantation
Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Radiation: radiation therapy
Phase III

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized
Official Title: STANDARD DOSE VERSUS MYELOABLATIVE THERAPY FOR PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED SYMPTOMATIC MULTIPLE MYELOMA, A PHASE III INTERGROUP STUDY

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):

Estimated Enrollment: 500
Study Start Date: January 1994
  Show Detailed Description

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   up to 70 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Newly diagnosed, active multiple myeloma of any stage requiring treatment

    • Smoldering myeloma (Durie-Salmon stage I) must have a 25% or greater increase in M component levels and/or Bence-Jones protein excretion or development of symptoms
  • Quantifiable M component of IgG, IgA, IgD, IgE, and/or urinary kappa or lambda light chain (Bence-Jones protein) excretion required

    • Plasmacytosis of at least 30% allowed for non-secretory disease or secretory disease without quantifiable protein
    • IgM peaks excluded
  • Evaluation of siblings as potential allogeneic bone marrow transplant donors required for patients 55 years of age and younger (As of 8/1/97, permanently closed)

    • HLA followed by DR and MLC testing required
  • Renal failure, even on dialysis, eligible provided:

    • Cause is attributed to myeloma (Bence-Jones protein or hypercalcemia)
    • Duration does not exceed 2 months
  • If medically appropriate, the following conditions should be treated prior to registration:

    • Pathologic fractures
    • Pneumonia at diagnosis
    • Hyperviscosity with shortness of breath

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • 70 and under

Performance status:

  • SWOG 0-2 (SWOG 3 or 4 based solely on bone pain allowed)

Hematopoietic:

  • Not specified

Hepatic:

  • Not specified

Renal:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Cardiovascular:

  • Normal ejection fraction by ECHO or MUGA
  • No myocardial infarction within 6 months
  • No unstable angina
  • No difficult to control congestive heart failure
  • No uncontrolled hypertension
  • No difficult to control arrhythmias
  • No history of chronic cerebral vascular accident

Pulmonary:

  • No history of chronic obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease
  • Pulmonary function studies and DLCO at least 50% of predicted except for demonstrated myeloma involvement on bronchoscopy and/or open lung biopsy

Other:

  • No uncontrolled diabetes
  • No significant comorbid medical condition
  • No uncontrolled, life-threatening infection
  • No prior malignancy within 5 years except adequately treated nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • No prior malignancy treated with cytotoxic drugs used on this protocol
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy:

  • No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy:

  • No prior radiotherapy except local radiotherapy provided the following cumulative dose limits for prior dose plus potential TBI dose on protocol are not exceeded:

    • Less than 5,000 cGy to bone
    • Less than 4,000 cGy to mediastinum, heart, small bowel, brain, and spinal cord
    • Less than 2,000 cGy to the liver
    • Less than 1,500 cGy to the kidney and lungs

Surgery:

  • Not specified
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00002548

  Hide Study Locations
Locations
United States, Arizona
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259-5404
United States, Colorado
CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Inc.
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209-5031
United States, Florida
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612-9497
United States, Illinois
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, United States, 61801
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lakeside Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61602
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611-3013
CCOP - Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
United States, Indiana
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-5289
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
United States, Iowa
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50309-1016
United States, Louisiana
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
United States, Maryland
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231-2410
United States, Massachusetts
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
New England Medical Center Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
United States, Michigan
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
CCOP - Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49007-3731
United States, Minnesota
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, United States, 55805
CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55416
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
United States, New York
Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center
Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States, 10016
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - New York
New York, New York, United States, 10010
United States, Ohio
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623-3456
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5065
United States, Pennsylvania
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822-2001
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102-1192
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213-3489
United States, Wisconsin
CCOP - Marshfield Medical Research and Education Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States, 54449
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Milwaukee (Zablocki)
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53295
Sponsors and Collaborators
Southwest Oncology Group
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Investigators
Study Chair: Bart Barlogie, MD University of Arkansas
Study Chair: Kenneth C. Anderson, MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Study Chair: Robert A. Kyle, MD Mayo Clinic
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD, McCoy J, Moore DF Jr, Dakhil SR, Lanier KS, Chapman RA, Cromer JN, Salmon SE, Durie B, Crowley JC. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):929-36. Epub 2006 Jan 23. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 10;24(17):2687. Moore, Dennis F Jr [added].
Van Ness BG, Crowley JC, Ramos C, et al.: SNP genotypes show association with common toxicities during both VAD induction and high dose melphalan with autologous transplant support in intergroup trial S9321 for myeloma: from the Bank on a Cure. [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-3488, 2005.
Crowley J, Fonseca R, Greipp P, et al.: Comparable survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) after VAD induction with high dose therapy using melphalan 140mg/m2 + TBI 12 Gy (MEL+TBI) versus standard therapy with VBMCP and no benefit from interferon (IFN) maintenance: final clinical results of intergroup trial S9321 in the context of IFM 90 and MRC VII trials. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-539, 2004.
Santana-Davila R, Crowley J, Durie B, et al.: Genetic polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome in the intergroup trial S9321, comparing high dose therapy with standard dose therapy for myelomaon, on behalf of ECOG, SWOG, CALGB, and the Bank on a Cure. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-1495, 2004.
Lee CK, McCoy J, Anderson KC, et al.: Long-term follow-up of previously untreated symptomatic myeloma patients treated with myeloablative therapy and sibling-matched allogeneic transplantation of the SWOG study 9321. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 pt 1): A-1644, 2002.
Greipp PR, Jacobson JL, Crowley JJ, et al.: BETA 2 microglobulin (beta 2M) and plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) constitute a strong prognostic index in the SWOG intergroup transplant trial S9321: observations on gender and age. [Abstract] Blood 96 (11 pt 1): A-653, 152a, 2000.
Desika R, Salmon S, Anderson K, et al.: Planned melphalan-total body irradiation (MEL-TBI) - based allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM) up to age 55: an intergroup experience (CALGB, ECOG and SWOG) under the auspices of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9321). [Abstract] Blood 94 (10 Pt 1): A-1546, 346a, 1999.
van Ness BG, Ramos C, Kumar V, et al.: Analytical approaches for the BOAC SNP panel association with progression free survival in myeloma. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-2715, 2008.
Crowley JJ, McCoy J, LeBlanc M, et al.: Extreme regression: a statistical technique for finding good or poor prognostic groups, illustrated using myeloma patient data from Intergroup trial S9321. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-5202, 2004.
Greipp PR, Kumar S, Blood EA, et al.: A simple classification to identify poor-risk untreated myeloma. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 Pt 1): A-2351, 598a, 2002.
Tian E, Bumm K, Xiao Y, et al.: A protocol for triple color interphase FISH on archived bone marrow biopsies from myeloma prepared with precipitating fixatives. [Abstract] Blood 96 (11 pt 1): A-665, 155a, 2000.
Rajkumar V, Leong T, Fonseca R, et al.: Bone marrow angiogenesis has prognostic value in multiple myeloma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A68, 19a, 1999.
Rimsza LM, Campbell K, Dalton WS, Salmon S, Willcox G, Grogan TM. The major vault protein (MVP), a new multidrug resistance associated protein, is frequently expressed in multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999 Jul;34(3-4):315-24.

Study ID Numbers: CDR0000063310, SWOG-9321, CLB-9312, E-S9321, INT-0141
Study First Received: November 1, 1999
Last Updated: February 6, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002548     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):
stage I multiple myeloma
stage II multiple myeloma
stage III multiple myeloma

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Dexamethasone
Prednisone
Anti-Infective Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
Antiemetics
Hormones
Hemorrhagic Disorders
Therapeutic Uses
Cardiovascular Diseases
Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
Immunoproliferative Disorders
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
Immune System Diseases
Hematologic Diseases
Carmustine
Vincristine
Glucocorticoids
Doxorubicin
Multiple Myeloma
Neoplasms
Interferon Alfa-2a
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
Melphalan
Interferon Type I, Recombinant
Immunologic Factors
Blood Protein Disorders
Antineoplastic Agents

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on November 27, 2009