Acupuncture Using Yamamoto's Method for the Treatment of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain (ANLBP)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Federal University of São Paulo
Information provided by:
Federal University of São Paulo
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01124955
First received: May 13, 2010
Last updated: June 13, 2011
Last verified: November 2009
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: August 9, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Low Back Pain |
| Interventions: |
Other: Acupuncture Other: Non-penetrating acupuncture |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| 100 patients were recruited from the university hospital of the Federal University of São Paul (UNIFESP), from November 2009 to June 2010. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| 80 patients were randomized during the study. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Acupuncture | The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
| Placebo Group | Patients were submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions in the placebo group (PG). |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Acupuncture | Placebo Group | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 40 | 40 |
| COMPLETED | 40 | 40 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Acupuncture | The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
| Placebo Group | Patients were submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions in the placebo group (PG). |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Acupuncture | Placebo Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
40 | 40 | 80 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| Between 18 and 65 years | 40 | 40 | 80 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
47 ± 9.8 | 43.9 ± 10.9 | 45.4 ± 10.3 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 25 | 26 | 51 |
| Male | 15 | 14 | 29 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| Brazil | 40 | 40 | 80 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Pain Assessed on a 10-point Numeric Pain Scale [ Time Frame: days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 1| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Pain Assessed on a 10-point Numeric Pain Scale |
| Measure Description | The primary outcome is a visual analog pain scale (VAS), graded in centimeters from 0 to 10 (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain), measured before (VAS 1) and after (VAS 2) the acupuncture session. |
| Time Frame | days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intention to treat analysis (ITT) |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Acupuncture | The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
| Placebo Group | Patients were submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions in the placebo group (PG). |
Measured Values
| Acupuncture | Placebo Group | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
40 | 40 |
|
Number of cm Analyzed
[units: cm] |
40 | 40 |
|
Pain Assessed on a 10-point Numeric Pain Scale
[units: cm] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Day 0 | 6.55 ± 1.4 | 6.68 ± 1.44 |
| Day 3 | 4.63 ± 2.23 | 5.13 ± 2.21 |
| Day 7 | 3.83 ± 2.61 | 4.4 ± 2.09 |
| Day 14 | 2.8 ± 2.27 | 3.95 ± 2.19 |
| Day 21 | 2.49 ± 2.4 | 4.18 ± 2.52 |
| Day 28 | 1.98 ± 2.12 | 3.38 ± 2.26 |
No statistical analysis provided for Pain Assessed on a 10-point Numeric Pain Scale
| 2. Secondary: | Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) [ Time Frame: days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Quality of Life Assessed on the SF-36 [ Time Frame: Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Likert Improvement Assessment Scale [ Time Frame: Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 21 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Number of Anti-inflammatory Tablets Taken [ Time Frame: Days 3,7,14,21 and 28 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
Publications:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Tatiana Molinas Hasegawa
Organization: Federal University of São Paulo
phone: 55 115576 4239
e-mail: tatianamolinas@hotmail.com
Organization: Federal University of São Paulo
phone: 55 115576 4239
e-mail: tatianamolinas@hotmail.com
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Tatiana Molinas Hasegawa, Federal University of Sao Paulo |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01124955 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | FDAAAAU |
| Study First Received: | May 13, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | August 9, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 13, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Brazil: Ethics Committee |