A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Common Facial Acne
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Stiefel, a GSK Company
Collaborator:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
GlaxoSmithKline ( Stiefel, a GSK Company )
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01017120
First received: November 19, 2009
Last updated: May 31, 2012
Last verified: May 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: May 31, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Acne Vulgaris |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Tazarotene Foam Drug: Vehicle Foam |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tazarotene Foam | Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. |
| Vehicle Foam | The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Tazarotene Foam | Vehicle Foam | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 373 | 369 |
| COMPLETED | 307 | 334 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 66 | 35 |
| Adverse Event | 9 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 13 | 11 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 39 | 21 |
| Pregnancy | 1 | 1 |
| Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria | 1 | 0 |
| Relocated Out of Town | 0 | 2 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Parent Unable to Provide Transportation | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tazarotene Foam | Tazarotene foam containing 0.1% tazarotene in an emulsion formulation foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Tazarotene foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. |
| Vehicle Foam | The matching vehicle foam containing only tazarotene foam vehicle was applied to the face once daily in the early evening for 12 weeks. A sufficient amount of study product was applied to cover the entire face and was gently rubbed into the skin until the study product disappeared. Vehicle foam was packaged in a 100-gram aluminum can pressurized with a hydrocarbon propellant. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Tazarotene Foam | Vehicle Foam | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
373 | 369 | 742 |
|
Age
[units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| Years | 19.2 ± 6.5 | 19.2 ± 6.8 | 19.2 ± 6.6 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 197 | 185 | 382 |
| Male | 176 | 184 | 360 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| American Indian or Alaskan Native | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Asian | 28 | 21 | 49 |
| Black | 60 | 57 | 117 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| White | 278 | 280 | 558 |
| Mixed Race | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12 ] |
| 2. Primary: | Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12 ] |
| 3. Primary: | Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC) [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Number of Participants With a Minimum 2 G Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 8 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Number of Participants With a Subject’s Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Change in Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Week 2, 4, 8, and 12 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12 ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12 ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12 ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12 ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | GlaxoSmithKline ( Stiefel, a GSK Company ) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01017120 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 114576, W0260-302 |
| Study First Received: | November 19, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | May 31, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | May 31, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |