Artery Elasticity After Switch From Epzicom to Truvada

This study has been terminated.
(Low enrollment)
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00998582
First received: October 19, 2009
Last updated: October 3, 2012
Last verified: October 2012
Results First Received: January 16, 2012  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Open Label;   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: HIV Infections
Intervention: Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Abacavir Participants randomized to this arm will continue abacavir and their other HIV medications with no changes
Tenofovir Participants randomized to this arm will switch from taking abacavir (co-formulated with lamivudine as Epzicom) and start taking tenofovir (co-formulated with emtricitabine as Truvada), and continue their other HIV medications

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Abacavir     Tenofovir  
STARTED     13     14  
COMPLETED     13     14  
NOT COMPLETED     0     0  



  Baseline Characteristics


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Change in Small Artery Elasticity (mL/mmHg x100) From Baseline to Week 24   [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks ]

2.  Primary:   Outcome Was Change in Large Artery Elasticity (mL/mmHg x100) From Baseline to Week 24   [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
Study stopped early due to low/inadequate enrollment and findings are subsequently limited by low power to detect differences.


  More Information