Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: Fall 2001 Study
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Merck
Information provided by:
Merck
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00963469
First received: August 19, 2009
Last updated: May 12, 2010
Last verified: May 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: September 16, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis |
| Interventions: |
Drug: montelukast sodium Drug: Comparator: loratadine Drug: Comparator: placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
|
Forty-seven study centers in the United States. Prime Therapy Period: August 2001 to November 2001 |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Patients who required excluded medication and those who did not meet a minimum predefined level of combined daytime nasal symptoms score during the run-in period were excluded from randomization. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Montelukast | Montelukast 10-mg tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Loratadine | Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine 10-mg tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Placebo | Montelukast | Loratadine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 451 | 448 | 180 |
| COMPLETED | 410 | 420 | 170 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 41 | 28 | 10 |
| Adverse Event | 15 | 11 | 1 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 10 | 7 | 2 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Protocol Violation | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| Pre-randomization Adverse Event | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Moved | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Site closed (local pollen Season ended) | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Montelukast | Montelukast 10-mg tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Loratadine | Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine 10-mg tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Placebo | Montelukast | Loratadine | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
451 | 448 | 180 | 1079 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ( Full Range ) |
35.9
( 15 to 82 ) |
35.5
( 15 to 82 ) |
38.7
( 15 to 79 ) |
36.2
( 15 to 82 ) |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 301 | 301 | 119 | 721 |
| Male | 150 | 147 | 61 | 358 |
|
Composite Symptoms Score
[1] [units: Scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.94 ± 0.46 | 1.98 ± 0.47 | 2.03 ± 0.46 | 1.97 ± 0.46 |
|
Daytime Eye Symptoms score
[2] [units: Scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.61 ± 0.81 | 1.64 ± 0.73 | 1.64 ± 0.78 | 1.63 ± 0.77 |
|
Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score
[3] [units: Scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2.16 ± 0.44 | 2.20 ± 0.46 | 2.23 ± 0.44 | 2.19 ± 0.45 |
|
Nighttime Symptoms Score
[4] [units: Scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.65 ± 0.64 | 1.69 ± 0.64 | 1.77 ± 0.63 | 1.69 ± 0.64 |
|
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Score
[5] [units: Scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3.37 ± 1.02 | 3.41 ± 1.00 | 3.46 ± 1.08 | 3.40 ± 1.02 |
| [1] | Composite Symptoms Scores were computed as the average of Daytime Nasal Scores (Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)) and Nighttime Symptoms Scores [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. |
|---|---|
| [2] | Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptoms of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score. |
| [3] | Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each nasal symptom of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. |
| [4] | Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptom of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings daily on a 4-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)], and the average score of the 3 symptoms was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score. |
| [5] | Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-28 questions on a 7-point scale [0(best) to 6(worst)] across 7 domains: activity,sleep,non-nose/eye symptoms,practical problems,nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotions. The scores for each domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2) ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment [ Time Frame: After first 2 weeks of treatment ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment [ Time Frame: After first 2 weeks of treatment ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 6| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment |
| Measure Description | An evaluation by the physician, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale [Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. |
| Time Frame | After first 2 weeks of treatment |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Montelukast | Montelukast 10-mg tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
| Loratadine | Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine 10-mg tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks |
Measured Values
| Placebo | Montelukast | Loratadine | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
434 | 424 | 172 |
|
Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment
[units: Scores on a scale] Least Squares Mean ( 95% Confidence Interval ) |
2.75
( 2.62 to 2.88 ) |
2.36
( 2.23 to 2.50 ) |
2.38
( 2.18 to 2.59 ) |
No statistical analysis provided for Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment
| 7. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2) ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
Publications:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Executive Vice President, Clinical and Quantitative Sciences
Organization: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
phone: 1-800-672-6372
Organization: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
phone: 1-800-672-6372
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Executive Vice President, Clinical and Quantitative Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00963469 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2009_647, MK0476-240 |
| Study First Received: | August 19, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | September 16, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | May 12, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |