Effect of Tadalafil Once a Day in Men With Erectile Dysfunction
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Eli Lilly and Company
Information provided by:
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00836693
First received: February 2, 2009
Last updated: December 15, 2010
Last verified: December 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: December 15, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Erectile Dysfunction |
| Interventions: |
Drug: tadalafil Drug: placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 147 | 70 |
| COMPLETED | 130 | 64 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 17 | 6 |
| Adverse Event | 4 | 1 |
| Sponsor Decision | 0 | 1 |
| Physician Decision | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 9 | 4 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Tadalafil | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
147 | 70 | 217 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
52.2 ± 10.90 | 51.9 ± 10.35 | 52.1 ± 10.71 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 147 | 70 | 217 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| White | 144 | 69 | 213 |
| Asian | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Unknown | 1 | 1 | 2 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| Germany | 39 | 19 | 58 |
| Greece | 19 | 9 | 28 |
| Italy | 27 | 13 | 40 |
| Poland | 31 | 14 | 45 |
| Spain | 31 | 15 | 46 |
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
[units: kilograms per square meter (kg/m²)] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
27.92 ± 4.685 | 27.74 ± 3.423 | 27.86 ± 4.313 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12 |
| Measure Description | Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low or no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) on 6 questions (1-5, 15 of the IIEF). Total Erectile Function Domain scores range from 0 to 30. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The efficacy analysis of the three primary efficacy variables (IIEF-EF, SEP Question 2, and SEP Question 3) was performed on all randomized subjects who had at least one baseline and one post-baseline observation on all three variables. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 67 |
|
Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 15.5 ± 6.00 | 16.0 ± 6.27 |
| Week 12 Change | 7.3 ± 6.01 | 3.3 ± 5.98 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 3.9 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.85 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 2.2 to 5.5 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. The null hypothesis concerning tadalafil versus placebo was to be rejected if, and only if, the three primary hypotheses (H01, H02, and H03) were all rejected therefore no adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 2. Primary: | Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses |
| Measure Description | Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 2. "Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?" Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The efficacy analysis of the three primary efficacy variables (IIEF-EF, SEP Question 2, and SEP Question 3) was performed on all randomized subjects who had at least one baseline and one post-baseline observation on all three variables. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 67 |
|
Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses
[units: percentage of yes responses] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 60.1 ± 38.77 | 59.9 ± 38.83 |
| Week 12 Change | 23.2 ± 31.92 | 11.6 ± 25.48 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 11.7 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.35 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 5.1 to 18.3 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. The null hypothesis concerning tadalafil versus placebo was to be rejected if, and only if, the three primary hypotheses (H01, H02, and H03) were all rejected therefore no adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 3. Primary: | Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses |
| Measure Description | Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3. "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The efficacy analysis of the three primary efficacy variables (IIEF-EF, SEP Question 2, and SEP Question 3) was performed on all randomized subjects who had at least one baseline and one post-baseline observation on all three variables. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 67 |
|
Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses
[units: percentage of yes responses] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 28.2 ± 31.86 | 32.2 ± 35.93 |
| Week 12 Change | 39.4 ± 34.71 | 19.3 ± 36.18 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 18.0 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 4.60 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 8.9 to 27.0 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. The null hypothesis concerning tadalafil versus placebo was to be rejected if, and only if, the three primary hypotheses (H01, H02, and H03) were all rejected therefore no adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 4. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per Night [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per Night |
| Measure Description | NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The man wears the device for three nights prior to visit 2 (baseline), visit 5 (end of randomised treatment) and visit 6 (end of follow-up). Data are entered for the 2 nights prior to the visit. During the night the man may have multiple erections. The number of erections is recorded. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per Night
[units: Number of events per night] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline (n=122, n=63) | 2.75 ± 2.270 | 2.44 ± 2.002 |
| Week 12 Change (n=96, n=49) | -0.11 ± 2.592 | -0.09 ± 2.214 |
No statistical analysis provided for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per Night
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per Night [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per Night |
| Measure Description | NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The duration of erections are measured and recorded. Data presented are the duration of erectile events at baseline and the change from baseline to Week 12. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per Night
[units: minutes] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline (n=104, n=56) | 28.487 ± 14.4791 | 26.372 ± 11.8969 |
| Week 12 Change (n=65, n=33) | -1.553 ± 16.0073 | -0.398 ± 12.4585 |
No statistical analysis provided for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per Night
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric Change [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric Change |
| Measure Description | NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The percent of volume change of the penis during erections is measured and recorded for each erection. Data presented are mean percentage of volumetric change from baseline to Week 12. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
65 | 33 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric Change
[units: percent of volumetric change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-5.96 ± 74.647 | -50.30 ± 150.321 |
No statistical analysis provided for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric Change
| 7. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient Diary |
| Measure Description | The morning erection diary allows the participant to record whether he experienced an erection on waking. The participant is to complete the morning erection diary every morning during the run-in, treatment and follow-up periods. The percentage of mornings the participant reported an erection is analysed. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient Diary
[units: percent] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline (n=145, n=67) | 31.0 ± 27.21 | 28.9 ± 25.74 |
| Week 12 Change (n=145, n=66) | 27.5 ± 25.29 | 11.9 ± 22.00 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient Diary
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 16.2 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.37 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 9.5 to 22.8 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The change from baseline to endpoint in morning erection percentages was analyzed with an ANCOVA model including terms for baseline value, treatment group, country, age and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value is for Week 12 change. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses (null hypothesis versus the alternative hypothesis) were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 8. Secondary: | The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week Endpoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week Endpoint |
| Measure Description | The subject questionnaire consists of 11 questions. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 4 (extremely high treatment satisfaction). The EDITS summary score will be obtained by adding each individual result for all questions, dividing by the number of questions answered (mean satisfaction score), and multiplying by 25, thus obtaining a score that ranges from 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 100 (extremely high satisfaction). |
| Time Frame | Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week Endpoint
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
72.8 ± 20.66 | 52.7 ± 22.62 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week Endpoint
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA |
| P Value [3] | >0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 20.0 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.11 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 13.9 to 26.1 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The models included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable,treatment group,country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction.In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 9. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire |
| Measure Description | SEAR measures improvement in self-esteem and relationship satisfaction. Questionnaire consists of two domains, Sexual Relationship (items 1-8) and Confidence (items 9-14). All questions except negatively worded questions 8 and 11 are scored from 1=almost never/never to 5=almost always/always. Questions 8 and 11 were reverse scored, thus a higher score signifies a more favorable response for all 14 items. Overall score is transformed into a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Total (Baseline) | 47.3 ± 21.95 | 47.9 ± 21.58 |
| Total (Change) | 20.4 ± 23.85 | 8.3 ± 21.14 |
| Sexual Relationship Domain (Baseline) | 43.0 ± 22.54 | 43.9 ± 21.68 |
| Sexual Relationship Domain (Change) | 23.4 ± 25.88 | 9.7 ± 22.35 |
| Confidence Domain (Baseline) | 53.1 ± 25.58 | 53.1 ± 24.85 |
| Confidence Domain (Change) | 16.5 ± 25.58 | 6.5 ± 24.57 |
| Self-Esteem Domain (Baseline) | 50.5 ± 28.15 | 48.5 ± 30.06 |
| Self-Esteem Domain (Change) | 19.2 ± 27.85 | 9.3 ± 30.05 |
| Overall Relationship Domain (Baseline) | 58.2 ± 31.47 | 62.3 ± 29.01 |
| Overall Relationship Domain (Change) | 11.0 ± 32.51 | 0.9 ± 30.17 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 11.7 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.17 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 5.5 to 18.0 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Total (Change). For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses (null hypothesis versus the alternative hypothesis) were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 13.2 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.36 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 6.6 to 19.8 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Sexual Relationship Domain(Change).For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses (null hypothesis versus the alternative hypothesis) were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0034 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 9.9 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.34 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 3.3 to 16.5 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Confidence Domain (Change).For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses (null hypothesis versus the alternative hypothesis) were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 4 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0020 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 11.0 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 3.52 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 4.1 to 17.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Self-Esteem Domain (Change).For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses (null hypothesis versus the alternative hypothesis) were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 5 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0653 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 7.5 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 4.07 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.5 to 15.6 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (at p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Overall Relationship Domain(Change).For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses (null hypothesis versus the alternative hypothesis) were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 10. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF) |
| Measure Description | Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OF domain range from 0 to 10. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF)
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 6.5 ± 2.99 | 7.2 ± 2.81 |
| Week 12 Change | 2.0 ± 2.78 | 0.5 ± 2.02 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 1.3 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.29 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.7 to 1.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change.For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 11. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Desire (SD) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Desire (SD) |
| Measure Description | Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-SD domain range from 0 to 10. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Desire (SD)
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 6.7 ± 1.81 | 6.6 ± 1.87 |
| Week 12 Change | 0.5 ± 1.93 | -0.1 ± 1.78 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Desire (SD)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0089 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.7 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.25 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.2 to 1.1 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 12. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Intercourse Satisfaction (IS) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Intercourse Satisfaction (IS) |
| Measure Description | Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 3 questions of the IIEF-IS domain range from 0 to 15. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Intercourse Satisfaction (IS)
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 8.2 ± 2.65 | 7.6 ± 2.43 |
| Week 12 Change | 2.1 ± 2.67 | 1.5 ± 2.56 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Intercourse Satisfaction (IS)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0461 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.8 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.37 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.0 to 1.5 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 13. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Overall Satisfaction (OS) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Overall Satisfaction (OS) |
| Measure Description | Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OS domain range from 0 to 10. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Overall Satisfaction (OS)
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 5.2 ± 2.15 | 5.1 ± 2.11 |
| Week 12 Change | 2.0 ± 2.37 | 0.8 ± 2.19 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Overall Satisfaction (OS)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 1.3 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.30 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.7 to 1.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Model included terms for baseline value of efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model,if the interaction was not significant (if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 14. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 1 Percentage of "Yes" Responses [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 1 Percentage of "Yes" Responses |
| Measure Description | Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 1. "Were you able to achieve at least some erection (some enlargement of the penis)? " Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 1 Percentage of "Yes" Responses
[units: percentage of yes responses] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 80.8 ± 28.52 | 74.2 ± 34.26 |
| Week 12 Change | 12.5 ± 24.03 | 9.5 ± 24.67 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 1 Percentage of "Yes" Responses
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0047 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 6.3 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 2.22 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 2.0 to 10.7 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (that is, if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on the type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Baseline = Visit 2; Endpoint = the last non-missing post-baseline value until Visit 5; Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 15. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 4 Percentage of "Yes" Responses [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 4 Percentage of "Yes" Responses |
| Measure Description | Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 4. "Were you satisfied with the hardness of your erection?" Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 4 Percentage of "Yes" Responses
[units: percentage of yes responses] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 11.7 ± 21.16 | 14.6 ± 23.30 |
| Week 12 Change | 44.1 ± 35.75 | 18.3 ± 32.14 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 4 Percentage of "Yes" Responses
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 24.5 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 4.99 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 14.6 to 34.3 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (that is, if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on the type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Baseline = Visit 2; Endpoint = the last non-missing post-baseline value until Visit 5; Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change.For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 16. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 5 Percentage of "Yes" Responses [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 5 Percentage of "Yes" Responses |
| Measure Description | Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 5. "Were you satisfied overall with this sexual experience?" Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 12 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 5 Percentage of "Yes" Responses
[units: percentage of yes responses] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 10.3 ± 20.36 | 12.9 ± 22.11 |
| Week 12 Change | 43.2 ± 35.52 | 18.5 ± 30.98 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 5 Percentage of "Yes" Responses
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 23.5 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 4.96 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 13.7 to 33.2 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The model included terms for baseline value of the efficacy variable, treatment group, country, and the baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. In any model, if the interaction was not significant (that is, if p≥0.10), then the interaction term was removed from the model and the main effects model was used to calculate the between-treatment-group p-value. All tests were based on the type 3 sums of squares. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Baseline = Visit 2; Endpoint = the last non-missing post-baseline value until Visit 5; Change = Endpoint - Baseline. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Week 12 Change.For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 17. Secondary: | Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at 12 Week Endpoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at 12 Week Endpoint |
| Measure Description | GAQ Question 1: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your ability to achieve and maintain your erections now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from 1=very much better to 7=very much worse. |
| Time Frame | Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at 12 Week Endpoint
[units: participants] |
||
| Very Much Better | 49 | 7 |
| Much Better | 41 | 8 |
| Little Better | 29 | 19 |
| No Change | 14 | 24 |
| A Little Worse | 5 | 5 |
| Much Worse | 4 | 3 |
| Very Much Worse | 2 | 1 |
| Missing | 4 | 2 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at 12 Week Endpoint
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used to compare responses to GAQs between treatment groups. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Global Assessment Questions GAQ1. For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. |
| 18. Secondary: | Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at 12 Week Endpoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at 12 Week Endpoint |
| Measure Description | GAQ Question 2: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your sexual life is now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from 1=very much better to 7=very much worse. |
| Time Frame | Week 12 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Tadalafil 5 milligrams (mg) administered orally once a day for 12 weeks. Dosing started at 5 mg tadalafil daily and could be down-titrated to 2.5 mg tadalafil daily based on individual tolerability. (Doses could subsequently be increased back to 5 mg based on response.) |
| Placebo | Placebo tablets, matching 5 mg and 2.5 mg tadalafil tablets, given once daily by oral administration for 12 weeks. |
Measured Values
| Tadalafil | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
146 | 69 |
|
Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at 12 Week Endpoint
[units: participants] |
||
| Very Much Better | 40 | 5 |
| Much Better | 49 | 11 |
| Little Better | 28 | 17 |
| No Change | 17 | 27 |
| A Little Worse | 3 | 4 |
| Much Worse | 4 | 3 |
| Very Much Worse | 1 | 0 |
| Missing | 4 | 2 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at 12 Week Endpoint
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used to compare responses to GAQs between treatment groups. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| p-value is for Global Assessment Question GAQ2.For secondary endpoints, all tests of hypotheses were performed as two-sided tests at the 0.05 significance level (α=0.05) unless otherwise stated. |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by Eli Lilly and Company
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Chief Medical Officer
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 800-545-5979
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 800-545-5979
No publications provided by Eli Lilly and Company
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Chief Medical Officer, Eli Lilly |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00836693 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 12229, H6D-MC-LVHX |
| Study First Received: | February 2, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | December 15, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 15, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Greece: National Organization of Medicines Italy: The Italian Medicines Agency Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines |