Efficacy and Safety of RAD001 in Patients Aged 18 and Over With Angiomyolipoma Associated With Either Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) (EXIST-2)
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals )
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00790400
First received: November 10, 2008
Last updated: February 25, 2013
Last verified: February 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: May 23, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Everolimus (RAD001) Other: Placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Everolimus | Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
| Placebo | Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Everolimus | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 79 | 39 |
| COMPLETED | 7 [1] | 13 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 72 | 26 |
| Ongoing in Double-blind | 72 | 26 |
| [1] | Completed means discontinued the double-blind treatment period |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Everolimus | Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
| Placebo | Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Everolimus | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
79 | 39 | 118 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
32.5 ± 10.37 | 31.0 ± 9.64 | 32.0 ± 10.12 |
|
Age, Customized
[units: Participants] |
|||
| <30 years | 35 | 20 | 55 |
| ≥ 30 years | 44 | 19 | 63 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 52 | 26 | 78 |
| Male | 27 | 13 | 40 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 2| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period) |
| Measure Description | Time to angiomyolipoma progression (TTAP) is defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented angiomyolipoma progression. Angiomyolipoma progression was defined as one or more of the following: • Increase from nadir of ≥ 25% in angiomyolipoma volume to value greater than baseline • The appearance of a new angiomyolipoma ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter •An increase from nadir of 20% or more in the volume of either kidney to a value greater than baseline •Angiomyolipoma-related bleeding grade ≥ 2 |
| Time Frame | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. Patients were to be analyzed according to the treatment that they were assigned at randomization. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Everolimus | Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
| Placebo | Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
Measured Values
| Everolimus | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
79 | 39 |
|
Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period)
[units: months] Median ( 95% Confidence Interval ) |
NA
( NA to NA ) [1] |
11.37
( 11.07 to NA ) [2] |
| [1] | The median time to Angiomyolipoma Progression could not be estimated because <50% of patients had an Angiomyolipoma Progression during the time period. |
|---|---|
| [2] | The upper limit was not estimable in the study as it is longer than the estimated time period till data cut-off date (30-June-2011) |
No statistical analysis provided for Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period)
| 3. Secondary: | Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 3| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) |
| Measure Description | Skin lesion response rate in the double-blind period was determined only among patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline, and is the percentage of this group of patients with a best overall skin lesion response on the Physician’s Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) of either complete clinical response (CCR) or partial response (PR). |
| Time Frame | From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. Patients were to be analyzed according to the treatment that they were assigned at randomization. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Everolimus | Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
| Placebo | Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets. |
Measured Values
| Everolimus | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
77 | 37 |
|
Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)
[units: Percentage of participants] Number ( 95% Confidence Interval ) |
26
( 16.6 to 37.2 ) |
0
( 0.0 to 9.5 ) |
No statistical analysis provided for Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Months ] |
Results not yet posted. Anticipated Posting Date:
12/2014
Safety Issue:
No
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organization: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
phone: 862-778-8300
Organization: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
phone: 862-778-8300
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals ) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00790400 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CRAD001M2302, 2008-002113-48 |
| Study First Received: | November 10, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | May 23, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | February 25, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration Canada: Health Canada France: Ministry of Health Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Italy: Ministry of Health Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Pharmaceutical and Medical Safety Bureau Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products Russia: Federal Service on Surveillance in Healthcare and Social Development of Russian Federation Spain: Ministerio de Sanidad y Politica Social United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency |