Efficacy and Safety of RAD001 in Patients Aged 18 and Over With Angiomyolipoma Associated With Either Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) (EXIST-2)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals )
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00790400
First received: November 10, 2008
Last updated: January 14, 2014
Last verified: January 2014
Results First Received: May 23, 2012  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conditions: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
Interventions: Drug: Everolimus (RAD001)
Drug: Placebo

  Participant Flow


  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Everolimus Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
Placebo Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    Everolimus     Placebo     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  79     39     118  
Age  
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  32.5  ± 10.37     31.0  ± 9.64     32.0  ± 10.12  
Age, Customized  
[units: Participants]
     
<30 years     35     20     55  
≥ 30 years     44     19     63  
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female     52     26     78  
Male     27     13     40  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period)   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

2.  Secondary:   Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period)   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

3.  Secondary:   Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

4.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules   [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Months ]
Results not yet posted.   Anticipated Posting Date:   12/2014   Safety Issue:   No


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information