Study of the Glycemic Effects of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol and HCTZ in Diabetic Hypertensive Patients
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Forest Laboratories
Information provided by:
Forest Laboratories
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00744237
First received: August 27, 2008
Last updated: June 30, 2011
Last verified: June 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: June 30, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Hypertension Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Nebivolol Drug: Metoprolol ER Drug: HCTZ |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Recruitment occured from September 2008 through December 2009 at 69 US sites |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Placebo washout phase was required for patients currently on any anti-hypertensives at screening exclusive of background ACE inhibitor or ARB before assignment to HCTZ or Metoprolol ER or Nebivolol arms. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Nebivolol |
|
| Metoprolol ER |
|
| Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) |
|
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Nebivolol | Metoprolol ER | Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 83 | 73 | 74 |
| COMPLETED | 56 | 46 | 59 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 27 | 27 | 15 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 9 | 5 | 3 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Inclusion/Exclusion criteria not met | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dosing Error | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Study Drug Error | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Prohibited Concomitant Medication | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Poor Compliance | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Administrative. Site Closed | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Adverse Event | 9 | 13 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Nebivolol |
|
| Metoprolol ER |
|
| Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) |
|
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Nebivolol | Metoprolol ER | Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
83 | 73 | 74 | 230 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
58.2 ± 9.3 | 59.2 ± 8.3 | 59.5 ± 9.0 | 58.9 ± 8.9 |
|
Age, Customized
[units: participants] |
||||
| Patients 18 to 64 years of age | 61 | 51 | 53 | 165 |
| Patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age. | 22 | 22 | 21 | 65 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 30 | 30 | 29 | 89 |
| Male | 53 | 43 | 45 | 141 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
||||
| United States | 78 | 69 | 72 | 219 |
| Puerto Rico | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26 [ Time Frame: visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Based on Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) [ Time Frame: [visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26)] ] |