A Study of the Performance of Certain Prevail Implants Used in Short Fixed Cases (RadioCity)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Biomet, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Biomet, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00723944
First received: July 25, 2008
Last updated: October 17, 2011
Last verified: October 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: June 26, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Partial Edentulism Tooth Disease |
| Interventions: |
Device: Osseotite Prevail Certain Prevail Device: Osseotite Certain |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| A minimum of 100 patients were enrolled across all participating centers, with enrollment beginning in January 2005. Enrollment period remained open until April 2006. Three participating sites were Universities and seven were private practices. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Pre-treatment included a screening visit (enroll those meeting all inclusion criteria), signing informed consent, and pre-surgical data collection.Patients returned for implant placement surgery, followed by temporary prosthesis placement at 2 months. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Patients with dental implant with internal connection and expanded, lateralized design at coronal portion |
| Osseotite Certain Implant | Patients with dental implant with internal connection and without the expanded, lateralized design at coronal portion |
Participant Flow for 4 periods
Period 1: Implant Placement Surgery
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Osseotite Certain Implant | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 52 [1] | 50 [2] |
| COMPLETED | 52 [3] | 50 [4] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | number of individual implant units is 148 |
|---|---|
| [2] | number of individual implant units is 138 |
| [3] | number of individual implant units completing is 148 |
| [4] | number of individual implant units completing is 138 |
Period 2: Permanent Prosthesis Placement
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Osseotite Certain Implant | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 52 [1] | 50 [2] |
| COMPLETED | 49 [3] | 41 [4] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 9 |
| Adverse Event | 1 | 7 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 2 |
| [1] | number of individual implant units is 148 |
|---|---|
| [2] | number of individual implant units is 138 |
| [3] | number of individual implant units completing is 134 |
| [4] | number of individual implant units completing is 112 |
Period 3: One Year Post Placement Follow-up
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Osseotite Certain Implant | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 49 [1] | 41 [2] |
| COMPLETED | 48 [3] | 37 [4] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 4 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 4 |
| [1] | number of individual implant units is 134 |
|---|---|
| [2] | number of individual implant units is 112 |
| [3] | number of individual implant units completing is 130 |
| [4] | number of individual implant units completing is 108 |
Period 4: Two Year Post Placement Follow-up
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Osseotite Certain Implant | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 48 [1] | 37 [2] |
| COMPLETED | 48 [3] | 37 [4] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | number of individual implant units is 130 |
|---|---|
| [2] | number of individual implant units is 108 |
| [3] | number of individual implant units completing is 130 |
| [4] | number of individual implant units completing is 108 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Patients with dental implant with internal connection and expanded, lateralized design at coronal portion |
| Osseotite Certain Implant | Patients with dental implant with internal connection and without the expanded, lateralized design at coronal portion |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Osseotite Certain Implant | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
52 | 50 | 102 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 40 | 38 | 78 |
| >=65 years | 12 | 12 | 24 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 21 | 19 | 40 |
| Male | 31 | 31 | 62 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 14 | 16 | 30 |
| Italy | 19 | 17 | 36 |
| France | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| Germany | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Sweden | 5 | 4 | 9 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Crestal Bone Regression (Amount of Bone Measured) Around Each Implant Unit [ Time Frame: 1 year ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 1| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Crestal Bone Regression (Amount of Bone Measured) Around Each Implant Unit |
| Measure Description | Millimeters of crestal bone observed and measured in a radiograph of each study implant is measured and averaged to obtain the mean crestal bone loss or gain for each implant unit. |
| Time Frame | 1 year |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| population represents all patients receiving test and control implants enrolled in the study, but only those implants achieving integration (lack of mobility) were analyzed and reported here up to the 12 months follow-up stage. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Patients with dental implant with internal connection and expanded, lateralized design at coronal portion |
| Osseotite Certain Implant | Patients with dental implant with internal connection and without the expanded, lateralized design at coronal portion |
Measured Values
| Osseotite Certain Prevail Implant | Osseotite Certain Implant | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
48 | 37 |
|
Number of implants Analyzed
[units: implants] |
130 | 108 |
|
Crestal Bone Regression (Amount of Bone Measured) Around Each Implant Unit
[units: millimeters] Mean ± Standard Error |
-0.7705 ± 0.1567 | -0.6648 ± .1158 |
No statistical analysis provided for Crestal Bone Regression (Amount of Bone Measured) Around Each Implant Unit
| 2. Secondary: | Osseous Integration [ Time Frame: 4 years ] |
Results not yet posted. Anticipated Posting Date:
No text entered.
Safety Issue:
Yes
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: James N. Kenealy, Pharm.D.
Organization: Biomet 3i LLC
phone: 5617766817
e-mail: jim.kenealy@biomet.com
Organization: Biomet 3i LLC
phone: 5617766817
e-mail: jim.kenealy@biomet.com
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Biomet, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00723944 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2302 |
| Study First Received: | July 25, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | June 26, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | October 17, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |