Compare the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin to Atorvastatin in High Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00683618
First received: May 21, 2008
Last updated: March 19, 2012
Last verified: March 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: July 9, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Hypercholesterolemia |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Rosuvastatin Drug: Atorvastatin |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| In total 934 patients were enrolled to the study, the study was conducted at 13 investigational sites in China. The first patient was enrolled on 27 May 2008, the last patient was completed on 16 Jul 2009. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| There is a dietary lead in period before randomization. 934 patients started the dietary lead in period. 436 patients completed this period. The baseline measurement is based on the ITT population. Patients included in ITT population in each arm is : Rosuvastatin 5mg 136, Rosuvastatin 10mg 139 and Atorvastatin 10mg 139. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Rosuvastatin 10mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Atorvastatin 10mg | Taken orally once daily |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: Randomised Treatment Period
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Rosuvastatin 10mg | Atorvastatin 10mg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 145 | 145 | 146 |
| COMPLETED | 139 | 143 | 140 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Adverse Event | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Reason not provided | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Period 2: Extension Treatment Period
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Rosuvastatin 10mg | Atorvastatin 10mg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 36 | 23 | 0 |
| COMPLETED | 33 | 23 | 0 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Rosuvastatin 10mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Atorvastatin 10mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Rosuvastatin 10mg | Atorvastatin 10mg | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
136 | 139 | 139 | 414 |
|
Age
[units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
60.4 ± 8.51 | 59.7 ± 10.57 | 58.4 ± 9.29 | 59.5 ± 9.51 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
||||
| Female | 84 | 85 | 77 | 246 |
| Male | 52 | 54 | 62 | 168 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: Participants] |
||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 136 | 139 | 139 | 414 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| White | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nativ Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C level)
[units: mmol/L] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
4.242 ± 0.6769 | 4.131 ± 0.6818 | 4.213 ± 0.6617 | 4.186 ± 0.6717 |
|
triglyceride (TG) level
[units: mmol/L] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.921 ± 0.7825 | 2.042 ± 0.9164 | 2.061 ± 0.8971 | 1.991 ± 0.8494 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 5mg With Atorvastatin 10mg [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 2. Primary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 10mg With Atorvastatin 10mg [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC ) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 5| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 6 |
| Measure Description | Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population. |
| Time Frame | baseline, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Patients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Rosuvastatin 10mg | Taken orally once daily |
| Atorvastatin 10mg | Taken orally once daily |
Measured Values
| Rosuvastatin 5mg | Rosuvastatin 10mg | Atorvastatin 10mg | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
135 | 139 | 139 |
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 6
[units: Percent change] Least Squares Mean ± Standard Error |
-20.09 ± 4.72 | -22.05 ± 4.69 | -20.67 ± 4.73 |
No statistical analysis provided for Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 6
| 6. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Non High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (nonHDL-C) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C/HDL-C) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (nonHDL-C/HDL-C) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A I (ApoB/ApoA-I) at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients Achieved ATP III Guideline (2001) Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Goal at Week 6 [ Time Frame: week 6 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | 6 weeksPercentage of Patients Achieved ATP III Guideline (2001) Non High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (nonHDL-C) Goal at Week 6 [ Time Frame: week 6 ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients Achieved National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III Guideline (2001) Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Goal After Titration [ Time Frame: from week 6 to week 12 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00683618 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D356FC00007 |
| Study First Received: | May 21, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | July 9, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | March 19, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | China: Ethics Committee China: Food and Drug Administration |