Erbitux in Combination With Xeloda and Cisplatin in Advanced Esophago-gastric Cancer (EXPAND)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Merck KGaA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00678535
First received: May 13, 2008
Last updated: March 30, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
Results First Received: March 30, 2013  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Open Label;   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Gastric Cancer
Interventions: Drug: Cetuximab
Drug: Capecitabine
Drug: Cisplatin

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
First/last participant (informed consent): June 2008/December 2010. Clinical data cut-off: 31 March 2012 Study completion 17 February 2013.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
Enrolled: 1,191 screened for eligibility; 287 excluded (mainly non-fulfillment of inclusion or exclusion criteria). 904 participants randomized.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin Cetuximab weekly (initial dose 400 milligram per square meter [mg/m^2] followed by 250 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion), cisplatin (3-week cycle, 80 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion on Day 1) and capecitabine (3-week cycle, 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily for 14 days ) until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin Cisplatin (3-week cycle, 80 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion on Day 1) and capecitabine (3-week cycle, 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily for 14 days) until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin     Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin  
STARTED     455 [1]   449 [1]
COMPLETED     362 [2]   351 [2]
NOT COMPLETED     93     98  
[1] ITT population
[2] subjects who died before or at 31 March 2012



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin Cetuximab weekly (initial dose 400 milligram per square meter [mg/m^2] followed by 250 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion), cisplatin (3-week cycle, 80 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion on Day 1) and capecitabine (3-week cycle, 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily for 14 days ) until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin Cisplatin (3-week cycle, 80 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion on Day 1) and capecitabine (3-week cycle, 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily for 14 days) until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin     Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  455     449     904  
Age  
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  58.0  ± 11.16     58.5  ± 10.83     58.3  ± 11.00  
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female     116     115     231  
Male     339     334     673  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time: Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments   [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012) ]

2.  Secondary:   Overall Survival (OS)   [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012) ]

3.  Secondary:   Best Overall Response (BOR) Rate: Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments   [ Time Frame: Every 6 weeks until progression, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012) ]

4.  Secondary:   Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012) ]

5.  Secondary:   Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by EuroQol 5Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012) ]

6.  Secondary:   Safety - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)   [ Time Frame: Time from first dose up to Day 30 after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012) ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Merck KGaA Communication Center
Organization: Merck Serono, a division of Merck KGaA
phone: +49-6151-72-5200
e-mail: service@merck.de


No publications provided


Responsible Party: Merck KGaA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00678535     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: EMR 200048-052, 2007-004219-75
Study First Received: May 13, 2008
Results First Received: March 30, 2013
Last Updated: March 30, 2013
Health Authority: Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica
Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration
Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee
Austria: Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency
Austria: Ethikkommission
Belgium: Directorate general for the protection of Public health: Medicines
Belgium: Ethics Committee
Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research
Bulgaria: Bulgarian Drug Agency
Bulgaria: Ethics committee
Chile: Comité de Ética Científico
Chile: Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
China: Food and Drug Administration
China: Ethics Committee
Czech Republic: Ethics Committee
Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control
France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis)
France: L’Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé
Germany: Paul-Ehrlich-Institut
Greece: Ethics Committee
Greece: National Organization of Medicines
Hong Kong: Ethics Committee
Israel: Ethics Commission
Israel: Israeli Health Ministry Pharmaceutical Administration
Italy: National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials - Ministry of Health
Italy: Ethics Committee
Japan: Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation
Japan: Institutional Review Board
Korea: Food and Drug Administration
Korea: Institutional Review Board
Poland: Ministry of Science and Higher Education
Poland: National Institute of Medicines
Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products
Portugal: Ethics Committee for Clinical Research
Portugal: Health Ethic Committee
Portugal: National Pharmacy and Medicines Institute
Romania: Ethics Committee
Romania: Ministry of Public Health
Romania: National Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices
Romania: National Authority for Scientific Research
Russia: Ethics Committee
Russia: Pharmacological Committee, Ministry of Health
Spain: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios
Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica
Taiwan : Food and Drug Administration
Taiwan: Institutional Review Board
United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
United Kingdom: Research Councils UK