Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Pravastatin 40 mg and Atorvastatin 10 mg in Type IIa and IIb Hypercholesterolaemic Patients (CAP-Chol)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by:
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00631189
First received: February 28, 2008
Last updated: June 14, 2011
Last verified: June 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: March 11, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Type IIa and IIb Hypercholesterolaemia |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Rosuvastatin Drug: Pravastatin Drug: Atorvastatin |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Patients were recruited by general practitioner. First patient included: 12 October 2007 Last patient terminated the study: 04 October 2008 |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| This French multicentre, randomized double-blind study was conducted on three parallel arms. The 14-week study comprised 3 visits: a screening visit (week 0, V1), a randomization and treatment allocation visit (week 6, V2) and an evaluation visit (week 14, V3). Patients were randomized at V2 and were treated for a period of 8 weeks. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Initial Phase | Initial phase (between V1 and V2) |
| Atorvastatin | Atorvastatin 10 mg |
| Pravastatin | Pravastatin 40 mg |
| Rosuvastatin | Rosuvastatin 5 mg |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: Initial Phase
| Initial Phase | Atorvastatin | Pravastatin | Rosuvastatin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 668 | 0 [1] | 0 [1] | 0 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 317 | 0 [1] | 0 [1] | 0 [1] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 351 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Protocol Violation | 347 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | Not applicable |
|---|
Period 2: Treatment Phase
| Initial Phase | Atorvastatin | Pravastatin | Rosuvastatin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 0 [1] | 104 | 103 | 110 |
| COMPLETED | 0 [1] | 97 | 92 | 103 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 7 | 11 | 7 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
| Adverse Event | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Pregnancy | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| patient did not take pravastatin | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| [1] | not applicable |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Initial Phase | Initial phase (between V1 and V2) |
| Atorvastatin | Atorvastatin 10 mg |
| Pravastatin | Pravastatin 40 mg |
| Rosuvastatin | Rosuvastatin 5 mg |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Initial Phase | Atorvastatin | Pravastatin | Rosuvastatin | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
0 | 104 | 103 | 110 | 317 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
57.31 ± 10.59 | 57.23 ± 10.8 | 57.04 ± 9.32 | 57.18 ± 9.95 | |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||||
| Female | 49 | 55 | 46 | unknown | |
| Male | 55 | 48 | 64 | unknown |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Level After 8 Weeks [ Time Frame: Change from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Compare the Percentage of Total Cholesterol Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment [ Time Frame: from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Compare the Percentage of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment [ Time Frame: After 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Triglycerides Values and After 8 Weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio and After 8 Weeks of Treatment [ Time Frame: baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Compare the Percentage of Variation of C-reactive Protein (CRP) [ Time Frame: baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Compare the Percentage of Variation of Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) [ Time Frame: from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Compare the Numbers of Patients Achieving the LDL-C Goal According to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP) ATP III) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients [ Time Frame: from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment ] |
| 9. Secondary: | To Evaluate Clinical and Laboratory Safety [ Time Frame: duration of study ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 9| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | To Evaluate Clinical and Laboratory Safety |
| Measure Description | Serious Adverse Event and Adverse Event reported throughout the study |
| Time Frame | duration of study |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Initial Phase | Initial phase (between V1 and V2) |
| Atorvastatin | Atorvastatin 10 mg |
| Pravastatin | Pravastatin 40 mg |
| Rosuvastatin | Rosuvastatin 5 mg |
Measured Values
| Initial Phase | Atorvastatin | Pravastatin | Rosuvastatin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
317 | 97 | 92 | 103 |
|
To Evaluate Clinical and Laboratory Safety
[units: Adverse Events] |
8 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
No statistical analysis provided for To Evaluate Clinical and Laboratory Safety
| 10. Secondary: | To Compare the Percentage of Patients Reaching the Overall LDL-C Goal According to the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients [ Time Frame: Not done ] |
Results not yet posted. Anticipated Posting Date:
No text entered.
Safety Issue:
No
| 11. Secondary: | To Compare the Percentage of Patients Reaching the LDL-C Goal, in Relation to the Number of Risk Factors, According to the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients [ Time Frame: Not done ] |
Results not yet posted. Anticipated Posting Date:
No text entered.
Safety Issue:
No
| 12. Secondary: | Compare the Numbers of Patients Achieving the LDL-C Goal According to the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients [ Time Frame: n/a ] |
Results not yet posted. Anticipated Posting Date:
No text entered.
Safety Issue:
No
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data. |
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Elisabeth Björk / Medical Science Director, AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00631189 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D3560L00068, EudraCT No 2006-006697-15 |
| Study First Received: | February 28, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | March 11, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 14, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) |