Comparison of the Subjective Well-being and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR to Risperidone (RECOVER)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00600756
First received: January 9, 2008
Last updated: October 2, 2012
Last verified: October 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: October 20, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Schizophrenic Disorders |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Quetiapine XR Drug: Risperidone |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
|
This study was a 1-year, randomized, prospective, parallel, open-label study. The study was conducted in 114 study centers in 13 countries. OR International multi-center study, 180 sites recruited between January 2008 and October 2009. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
|
Screening for eligibility. Patients with a SWN-K total score ≤ 75 were entered into the study. All patients with “no intake of IP and missing SWN-K total score at baseline or following baseline were included in the study “Overall Number of Participants” but these patients are excluded from the ITT Analysis set! |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine XR | Experimental - oral, once daily, tablets of 400 mg to 800 mg |
| Risperidone | Active Comparator – oral, once daily, tablets of 2 mg to 6 mg |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: Analysis After 6 Months
| Quetiapine XR | Risperidone | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 395 | 403 |
| COMPLETED | 264 [1] | 283 [1] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 131 | 120 |
| Adverse Event | 43 | 33 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 38 | 30 |
| Incorrect Enrollment | 12 | 21 |
| worsening symptom, lack of efficacy | 11 | 14 |
| Severe non-compliance to protocol | 11 | 11 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 10 | 8 |
| Study-specific discontinuation criteria | 6 | 3 |
| [1] | Completers are all patients who completed the study up to Visit 5 (including premature withdraw) |
|---|
Period 2: Overall Study Analysis After 12 Months
| Quetiapine XR | Risperidone | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 395 | 403 |
| Randomized Analysis | 395 | 403 |
| Safety Analysis | 391 | 402 |
| ITT Analysis | 379 | 392 |
| COMPLETED | 212 [1] | 227 [1] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 183 | 176 |
| Adverse Event | 53 | 44 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 51 | 41 |
| Incorrect enrollment | 21 | 29 |
| worsening symptom, lack of efficacy | 17 | 20 |
| Severe non-compliance to protocol | 16 | 20 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 16 | 13 |
| Study-specific discontinuation criteria | 9 | 9 |
| [1] | Completed study to Visit 7 (includes premature withdrawals with final visit in the Visit 7 window) |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine XR | Experimental - oral, once daily, tablets of 400 mg to 800 mg |
| Risperidone | Active Comparator – oral, once daily, tablets of 2 mg to 6 mg |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Quetiapine XR | Risperidone | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
395 | 403 | 798 |
|
Age
[units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
39.3 ± 11.7 | 40.0 ± 11.66 | 39.7 ± 11.67 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 162 | 171 | 333 |
| Male | 233 | 232 | 465 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Responder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total Score [ Time Frame: 6 months ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Physical Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population. [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Social Integration at Month 12 in the ITT Population. [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Mental Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population. [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Self-control at Month 12 in the ITT Population. [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Emotional Regulation at Month 12 in the ITT Population. [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months ] |
| 9. Secondary: | The Remission Rate in Both the Quetiapine XR Group and the Risperidone Group at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 10. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in CGI-SCH Overall Severity Score (Improved). [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 11. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in CGI-SCH Overall Severity Score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 12. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 13. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Relapse Rate at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Evaluation of Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone on the Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Schizophrenia by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in EQ-5D(Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Index Score at Month 12 in the ITT Population. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 15. Secondary: | To Evaluate the Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Functional Improvement Rate of the Modified Vocational Status Index/ Location Code Index: Stable State [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 16. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Mean Number of Lost School/Work Days at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 17. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Participants With at Least 1 Hospitalization Due to Psychiatric Disorders at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Number of Subjects Who Had an Unscheduled Visits Due to Worsening of Schizophrenia, Dose Change, or Adverse Event at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Month 12 ] |
| 19. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Time Between First Study Drug Intake and First Hospitalization for Patients With 1 Hospitalization in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Number of Participants Using Antidepressants at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 21. Secondary: | The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Number of Participants Using Other Psychotropic Medications at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 22. Secondary: | The Compliance of Patients Taking Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Returned Study Drug at Month 12 in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 23. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) at Month 12 in the Safety Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 24. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Study Because of an TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 25. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Had at Least 1 Extra-pyramidal TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 26. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Extra-pyramidal Events at Month 12 in the Safety Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 27. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Had at Least 1 Cardiac TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 28. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Prolactin Levels in the Safety Population [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 29. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser, Side Effect Rating Scale: Neurologic [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 30. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in the Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified UKU: Hyperprolactinaemia in Women [ Time Frame: Month 12 ] |
| 31. Secondary: | The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in the Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified UKU: Sexual Dysfunction in Men [ Time Frame: Month 12 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Gerard Lynch
Organization: AstraZeneca
e-mail: clinicaltrialtransparency@astrazeneca.com
Organization: AstraZeneca
e-mail: clinicaltrialtransparency@astrazeneca.com
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00600756 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D1443L00039 |
| Study First Received: | January 9, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | October 20, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | October 2, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: The Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment Brazil: Ministry of Health Bulgaria: Ministry of Health Costa Rica: Ministry of Health Costa Rica Denmark: The Ministry of the Interior and Health Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Italy: National Institute of Health Mexico: National Institute of Public Health, Health Secretariat Portugal: National Pharmacy and Medicines Institute Romania: Ministry of Public Health Russia: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Spain: Ministry of Health and Consumption Switzerland: Federal Office of Public Health Turkey: Ministry of Health |