|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Non-Randomized, Open Label, Single Group Assignment |
| Condition: |
Parkinson's Disease |
| Intervention: |
Drug: Rotigotine |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| 124 patients were screened. 5 patients were run-in failures and 3 patients were screen failures. 116 patients started treatment, i.e. were included into the Safety Set. 114 patients were included into the Full Analysis Set. 99 patients completed the treatment period. 2 patients withdrew after the treatment period. 97 patients completed the study. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
| STARTED | 124 |
| Start of Treatment - Safety Set | 116 |
| Full Analysis Set | 114 |
| Treatment Period Completed | 99 |
| COMPLETED | 97 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 27 |
| Adverse Event | 13 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 3 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 2 |
| Run-In Failure | 5 |
| Screen Failure | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants [units: participants] |
116 |
|
Age [units: participants] |
|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 73 |
| >=65 years | 43 |
|
Age [units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
60.0 ± 10.1 |
|
Gender [units: participants] |
|
| Female | 69 |
| Male | 47 |
|
Region of Enrollment [units: participants] |
|
| Korea, Republic of | 116 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 1 Minute) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 1 Minute) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 1 Minute)
[units: beats per minute] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2.0 ± 9.4 |
| 2. Primary: | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
5.7 ± 14.1 |
| 3. Primary: | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.7 ± 9.6 |
| 4. Primary: | Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 5 Minutes) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 5 Minutes) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 5 Minutes)
[units: beats per minute] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.8 ± 8.8 |
| 5. Primary: | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes) [ Baseline, 28 Days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 Days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2.6 ± 13.1 |
| 6. Primary: | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.6 ± 9.8 |
| 7. Primary: | Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 1 Minute) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 1 Minute) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 1 Minute)
[units: beats per minute] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.7 ± 11.8 |
| 8. Primary: | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.2 ± 12.7 |
| 9. Primary: | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.8 ± 10.1 |
| 10. Primary: | Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 3 Minutes) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 3 Minutes) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 3 Minutes)
[units: beats per minute] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.8 ± 11.1 |
| 11. Primary: | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2.0 ± 12.4 |
| 12. Primary: | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes) |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes)
[units: mmHg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.8 ± 9.1 |
| 13. Primary: | Change in Heart Rate [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Heart Rate |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Heart Rate
[units: beats per minute] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.5 ± 8.7 |
| 14. Primary: | Change in PR Interval [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in PR Interval |
| Measure Description |
The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization (beginning of the QRS complex). Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
110 |
|
Change in PR Interval
[units: msec] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.0 ± 14.6 |
| 15. Primary: | Change in QRS Duration [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in QRS Duration |
| Measure Description |
The QRS duration represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur. Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in QRS Duration
[units: msec] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-1.2 ± 6.3 |
| 16. Primary: | Change in QT Interval [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in QT Interval |
| Measure Description |
The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization. Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in QT Interval
[units: msec] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-1.7 ± 30.5 |
| 17. Primary: | Change in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) |
| Measure Description |
The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization. Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB)
[units: msec] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.5 ± 23.1 |
| 18. Primary: | Change in Percentage of Basophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Percentage of Basophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Percentage of Basophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count
[units: Percentage of white blood cell count] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.01 ± 0.33 |
| 19. Primary: | Change in Percentage of Eosinophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Percentage of Eosinophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Percentage of Eosinophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count
[units: Percentage of white blood cell count] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.11 ± 1.71 |
| 20. Primary: | Change in Hematocrit [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Hematocrit |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Hematocrit
[units: l/l*100] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.09 ± 1.71 |
| 21. Primary: | Change in Hemoglobin [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Hemoglobin |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Hemoglobin
[units: g/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.8 ± 5.6 |
| 22. Primary: | Change in Percentage of Lymphocytes in White Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Percentage of Lymphocytes in White Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Percentage of Lymphocytes in White Blood Cell Count
[units: Percentage of white blood cell count] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.73 ± 7.12 |
| 23. Primary: | Change in Percentage of Monocytes in White Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Percentage of Monocytes in White Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Percentage of Monocytes in White Blood Cell Count
[units: Percentage of white blood cell count] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.96 ± 8.41 |
| 24. Primary: | Change in Percentage of Neutrophilic Granulocytes Segmented in White Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Percentage of Neutrophilic Granulocytes Segmented in White Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Percentage of Neutrophilic Granulocytes Segmented in White Blood Cell Count
[units: Percentage of white blood cell count] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.40 ± 12.69 |
| 25. Primary: | Change in Platelet Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Platelet Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Platelet Count
[units: Giga/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2.6 ± 29.5 |
| 26. Primary: | Change in Red Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Red Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Red Blood Cell Count
[units: Tera/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.023 ± 0.213 |
| 27. Primary: | Change in White Blood Cell Count [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in White Blood Cell Count |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in White Blood Cell Count
[units: Giga/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.045 ± 3.538 |
| 28. Primary: | Change in Albumin [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Albumin |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Albumin
[units: g/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.5 ± 2.1 |
| 29. Primary: | Change in Alkaline Phosphatase [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Alkaline Phosphatase |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Alkaline Phosphatase
[units: Units/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-1.4 ± 16.9 |
| 30. Primary: | Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen
[units: mmol/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.24 ± 1.75 |
| 31. Primary: | Change in Calcium [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Calcium |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Calcium
[units: mg/dl] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.05 ± 0.30 |
| 32. Primary: | Change in Chloride [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Chloride |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Chloride
[units: mmol/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.4 ± 2.5 |
| 33. Primary: | Change in Creatinine [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Creatinine |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Creatinine
[units: mg/dl] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.004 ± 0.101 |
| 34. Primary: | Change in Gamma-Glutamyltransferase [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Gamma-Glutamyltransferase |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Gamma-Glutamyltransferase
[units: Units/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.1 ± 7.5 |
| 35. Primary: | Change in Glucose [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Glucose |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Glucose
[units: mg/dl] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.2 ± 30.0 |
| 36. Primary: | Change in Inorganic Phosphate [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Inorganic Phosphate |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Inorganic Phosphate
[units: mg/dl] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.03 ± 0.52 |
| 37. Primary: | Change in Potassium [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Potassium |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Potassium
[units: mmol/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.08 ± 0.35 |
| 38. Primary: | Change in Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase
[units: Units/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.1 ± 7.9 |
| 39. Primary: | Change in Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase
[units: Units/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.2 ± 15.6 |
| 40. Primary: | Change in Sodium [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Sodium |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
108 |
|
Change in Sodium
[units: mmol/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.6 ± 2.2 |
| 41. Primary: | Change in Total Bilirubin [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Total Bilirubin |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Total Bilirubin
[units: mg/dl] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.079 ± 1.133 |
| 42. Primary: | Change in Total Protein [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Total Protein |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Total Protein
[units: g/dl] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.09 ± 0.36 |
| 43. Primary: | Change in Uric Acid [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Uric Acid |
| Measure Description | Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Uric Acid
[units: µmol/l] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-3.80 ± 35.62 |
| 44. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Ears, Eyes, Nose, Mouth, Throat’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Ears, Eyes, Nose, Mouth, Throat’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Ears, Eyes, Nose, Mouth, Throat’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 45. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Psychiatric’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Psychiatric’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Psychiatric’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 46. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Hematological/Lymphatic Nodes’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Hematological/Lymphatic Nodes’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Hematological/Lymphatic Nodes’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 47. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Dermatological’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Dermatological’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Dermatological’
[units: participants] |
1 |
| 48. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Cardiovascular’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Cardiovascular’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Cardiovascular’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 49. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Peripheral Vascular’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Peripheral Vascular’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Peripheral Vascular’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 50. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Pulmonary’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Pulmonary’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Pulmonary’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 51. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Musculoskeletal’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Musculoskeletal’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Musculoskeletal’
[units: participants] |
1 |
| 52. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Hepato-/Gastrointestinal’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Hepato-/Gastrointestinal’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Hepato-/Gastrointestinal’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 53. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Renal/Genitourological’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Renal/Genitourological’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Renal/Genitourological’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 54. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Metabolic/Endocrine’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Metabolic/Endocrine’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Metabolic/Endocrine’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 55. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Other’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Other’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for ‘Other’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 56. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Mental Status’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Mental Status’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Mental Status’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 57. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Deep Tendon Reflexes’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Deep Tendon Reflexes’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Deep Tendon Reflexes’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 58. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Muscle Strength’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Muscle Strength’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Muscle Strength’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 59. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Cranial Nerve Function’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Cranial Nerve Function’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Cranial Nerve Function’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 60. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Plantar Reflex’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Plantar Reflex’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Plantar Reflex’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 61. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Gait’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Gait’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Gait’
[units: participants] |
1 |
| 62. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Coordination/Balance’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Coordination/Balance’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Coordination/Balance’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 63. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Involuntary Movements’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Involuntary Movements’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Involuntary Movements’
[units: participants] |
1 |
| 64. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Sensory Perception’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Sensory Perception’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Sensory Perception’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 65. Primary: | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Other’ [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Other’ |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for ‘Other’
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 66. Primary: | Completion of Trial From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Completion of Trial From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
116 |
|
Completion of Trial From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: participants] |
99 |
| 67. Primary: | Completion of Trial on the Original Treatment Assignment From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Completion of Trial on the Original Treatment Assignment From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
116 |
|
Completion of Trial on the Original Treatment Assignment From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: participants] |
88 |
| 68. Primary: | Drop-out During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs) [ Baseline, 2 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Drop-out During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs) |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 2 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
116 |
|
Drop-out During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
[units: participants] |
0 |
| 69. Primary: | Drop-out Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period [ Baseline, 56 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Drop-out Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 56 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
116 |
|
Drop-out Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period
[units: participants] |
9 |
| 70. Primary: | Dose Reduction During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs) [ Baseline, 2 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Dose Reduction During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs) |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 2 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
116 |
|
Dose Reduction During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
[units: participants] |
1 |
| 71. Primary: | Dose Reduction Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period [ Baseline, 56 days ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Dose Reduction Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 56 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
116 |
|
Dose Reduction Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period
[units: participants] |
1 |
| 72. Secondary: | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson’s disease UPDRS Part I measures 'Mentation, Behavior and Mood'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 16 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.5 ± 1.2 |
| 73. Secondary: | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson’s disease UPDRS Part II measures 'Activities in Daily Living'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 52 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.9 ± 3.3 |
| 74. Secondary: | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson’s disease UPDRS Part III measures 'Motor Examination'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 56 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-1.9 ± 5.9 |
| 75. Secondary: | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson’s disease UPDRS Part IV measures 'Complications of Therapy'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 23 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.4 ± 1.8 |
| 76. Secondary: | Change in Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description |
The PDSS is a scale to assess sleep and nocturnal disability in Parkinson’s disease. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 60 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.8 ± 7.3 |
| 77. Secondary: | Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire in which the subject rates the probability of his/her dozing during 8 situations that are differently conductive to sleep Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 24 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
55 |
|
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.2 ± 3.2 |
| 78. Secondary: | Change in Parkinson’s Disease Non-Motor Symptom Assessment Scale (PDNMS) Total Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Parkinson’s Disease Non-Motor Symptom Assessment Scale (PDNMS) Total Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description | The PDNMS is a rating by the clinician to assess the severity and frequency of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease patients Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 384 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
111 |
|
Change in Parkinson’s Disease Non-Motor Symptom Assessment Scale (PDNMS) Total Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-7.9 ± 19.8 |
| 79. Secondary: | Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 1 Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 1 Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description |
The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 1 measures 'Severity of Parkinson’s Disease'. Range: 1 (Normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill patients) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 1 Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-0.0 ± 0.6 |
| 80. Secondary: | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 2 Score [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 2 Score |
| Measure Description |
The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 2 measures 'Global Improvement'. Range 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse) |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
113 |
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 2 Score
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3.6 ± 1.0 |
| 81. Secondary: | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.1 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.1 |
| Measure Description |
The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 3.1 measures 'Therapeutic Effect'. Range: 1 (Marked – Vast improvement. Complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms.) to 4 (Unchanged or worse) |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.1
[units: participants] |
|
| Marked | 3 |
| Moderate | 20 |
| Minimal | 36 |
| Unchanged or Worse | 54 |
| Not Assessed | 1 |
| 82. Secondary: | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.2 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.2 |
| Measure Description |
The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 3.2 measures 'Therapeutic Side Effects'. Range: 1 (None) to 4 (Outweigh the therapeutic effect) |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.2
[units: participants] |
|
| None | 88 |
| No Significant Interference with Subj. Functioning | 18 |
| Significant Interference with Subj. Functioning | 5 |
| Outweigh the Theraputic Effect | 2 |
| Not Assessed | 1 |
| 83. Secondary: | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 1 Score [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 1 Score |
| Measure Description |
The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 1 measures 'Global Improvement'. Range: 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse) |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 1 Score
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3.6 ± 1.2 |
| 84. Secondary: | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 2 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 2 |
| Measure Description |
The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 2 measures 'Therapeutic Effect'. Range: 1 (Marked – Vast improvement. Complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms) to 4 (Unchanged or worse) |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 2
[units: participants] |
|
| Marked | 5 |
| Moderate | 25 |
| Minimal | 38 |
| Unchanged or Worse | 44 |
| Missing / Not Done | 2 |
| 85. Secondary: | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 3 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 3 |
| Measure Description |
The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time. Item 3 measures 'Side Effects'. Range: 1 (I have no side effects) to 4 (They outweigh the therapeutic effect of the trial medication) |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 3
[units: participants] |
|
| No Side Effects | 77 |
| No Significant Interference with Functioning | 24 |
| Significant Interference with Functioning | 6 |
| Outweighing Therapeutic Effect of Trial Medication | 5 |
| Missing / Not Done | 2 |
| 86. Secondary: | Change in Short-form Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Single Index Score From Baseline to End of Treatment [ Baseline, 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in Short-form Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Single Index Score From Baseline to End of Treatment |
| Measure Description |
The PDQ-8 is a self-administered 8-item questionnaire that assesses issues associated with Parkinson's disease. Range: 0 (good health) to 100 (poor health) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set, only patients with non-missing values were analyzed |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
112 |
|
Change in Short-form Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Single Index Score From Baseline to End of Treatment
[units: score on scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-3.9 ± 13.5 |
| 87. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 1 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 1 |
| Measure Description | Have you used pharmaceutical treatments for your Parkinson’s disease before the study? |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 1
[units: participants] |
|
| yes | 114 |
| no | 0 |
| 88. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 2 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 2 |
| Measure Description | Why did you decide to enter this study? |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 2
[units: participants] |
|
| Side effects with oral medicine | 14 |
| Oral medicine not effective in controlling sympt. | 21 |
| Taking med. several times a day was not convenient | 71 |
| Other | 40 |
| 89. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 3 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 3 |
| Measure Description | In comparing the patch and previous oral treatments for Parkinson’s disease, how satisfied have you been with oral medication / patch? |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 3
[units: participants] |
|
| Very Dissatisfied with Oral Medication | 3 |
| Dissatisfied with Oral Medication | 11 |
| Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with Oral Med. | 49 |
| Satisfied with Oral Medication | 43 |
| Very Satisfied with Oral Medication | 6 |
| Assessment for Oral Medication Missing / Not Done | 2 |
| Very Dissatisfied with Patch | 9 |
| Dissatisfied with Patch | 28 |
| Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with Patch | 34 |
| Satisfied with Patch | 32 |
| Very Satisfied with Patch | 9 |
| Assessment for Patch Missing / Not Done | 2 |
| 90. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 4 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 4 |
| Measure Description | I would prefer using a patch over taking a pill or capsule for treatment of my Parkinson’s disease. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 4
[units: participants] |
|
| Strongly Agree | 18 |
| Agree | 34 |
| Neither Agree nor Disagree | 29 |
| Disagree | 28 |
| Strongly Disagree | 3 |
| Not Done / Missing | 2 |
| 91. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 5 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 5 |
| Measure Description | I would prefer applying one 40cm**2 patch over applying two 20cm**2 patches for treatment of my Parkinson’s disease. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 5
[units: participants] |
|
| Strongly Agree | 17 |
| Agree | 68 |
| Neither Agree nor Disagree | 10 |
| Disagree | 13 |
| Strongly Disagree | 4 |
| Not Done / Missing | 2 |
| 92. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 6 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 6 |
| Measure Description | What aspects do you like the most about the patch? |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 6
[units: participants] |
|
| Applying the patch once a day | 81 |
| Comfortable to wear | 28 |
| Does not interfere with my normal activities | 61 |
| Do not have to take medicine in public | 56 |
| Provides symptom relief all day | 46 |
| Convenient | 53 |
| Easy to apply | 50 |
| Do not have to remember to take med. during day | 60 |
| Missing / Not Done | 2 |
| 93. Secondary: | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 7 [ 28 days ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 7 |
| Measure Description | What aspects do you like the least about the patch? Check all that apply. |
| Time Frame | 28 days |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Full Analysis Set |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Rotigotine | Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 8mg/24h at a dose considered by the investigator to be equivalent to the dose of ropinirole that the subject was currently taking. |
| Rotigotine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
114 |
|
Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 7
[units: participants] |
|
| Hard to apply | 11 |
| Hard to remove | 3 |
| Hard to remove the patch from its pouch | 1 |
| Did not stay on for the entire day | 80 |
| Uncomfortable to wear | 27 |
| Not always covered by clothing | 8 |
| Symptom relief did not last all day | 29 |
| Not Done / Missing | 2 |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Responsible Party: | UCB ( Study Director ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | SP908 |
| Study First Received: | December 21, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | December 17, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | November 5, 2009 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00593606 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | Korea: Food and Drug Administration |