Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction And Convenience Of Two Formulations Of Lamotrigine In Subjects With A Mood Disorder
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00579982   Information provided by GlaxoSmithKline
First Received: December 20, 2007   Last Updated: September 16, 2009   History of Changes
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Non-Randomized, Open Label, Single Group Assignment
Condition: Mood Disorder
Intervention: Drug: Lamotrigine

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Lamotrigine Orally Disintegrating Tablet (ODT). ODT dosing was to match the dose and regimen of the immediate release (IR) dose the subject was taking at baseline. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ODT dose was 261.3 (118.9) mg/day.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
  Lamotrigine
STARTED   97  
COMPLETED   89  
NOT COMPLETED   8  
      Adverse Event               4  
      Protocol Violation               4  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Lamotrigine Orally Disintegrating Tablet (ODT). ODT dosing was to match the dose and regimen of the immediate release (IR) dose the subject was taking at baseline. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ODT dose was 261.3 (118.9) mg/day.

Baseline Measures
  Lamotrigine
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
97
Age  
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
41.0 ± 12.07
Gender  
[units: participants]
 
Female 83
Male 14
Race/Ethnicity, Customized  
[units: participants]
 
White 94
Black 2
Mixed race 1



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Mean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.   [ Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

2.  Secondary:   Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3   [ Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

3.  Secondary:   Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3   [ Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal ]

4.  Secondary:   Mean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3   [ Baseline, End of Study (Week 3 weeks) or at Early Withdrawal ]

5.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)?" at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

6.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve" at Week 3   [ Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

7.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question “How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth?” at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

8.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet?" at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

9.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet"? at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

10.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet"? at Week 3.   [ End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]

11.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet"? at Week 3   [ Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 11

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet"? at Week 3
Measure Description Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 7: How satisfied were you with the aftertaste of the tablet (the taste remaining in your mouth after swallowing the tablet)? [from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 6 (I did NOT experience an aftertaste)]
Time Frame Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
ITT

Reporting Groups
  Description
Lamotrigine Orally Disintegrating Tablet (ODT). ODT dosing was to match the dose and regimen of the immediate release (IR) dose the subject was taking at baseline. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ODT dose was 261.3 (118.9) mg/day.

Measured Values
  Lamotrigine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
97
Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet"? at Week 3
[units: Number of participants]
 
Extremely dissatisfied 3
Very dissatisfied 16
Satisfied 28
Very satisfied 11
Extremely satisfied 11
I did NOT experience an aftertaste 28

No statistical analysis provided for Number of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet"? at Week 3



12.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet"? at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal ]

13.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Answering the Question "Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet?" at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal ]

14.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Indicating a Preference for ODT or the Standard IR Tablet at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal ]

15.  Secondary:   Number of Companions/Caregivers Indicating Whether ODT or Standard IR Tablet is More Convenient at Week 3   [ End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal ]

16.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Indicating at Week 3 (by Answering Yes/no) That They Would be More Likely to Take the ODT Formulation   [ End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal ]


  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343


No publications provided


Responsible Party: GSK ( Study Director )
Study ID Numbers: LBI108884
Study First Received: December 20, 2007
Results First Received: June 4, 2009
Last Updated: September 16, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00579982     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration