KIVEXA Vs TRUVADA, Both Administered With Efavirenz, In ART-Naive Subjects (ASSERT)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00549198
First received: October 24, 2007
Last updated: April 7, 2011
Last verified: April 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: September 23, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus I HIV Infection |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Abacavir/lamivudine and efavirenz Drug: Tenofovir/Emtricitabine and efavirenz |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ABC/3TC FDC | Abacavir (ABC) 600 mg/lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg fixed dose combination (FDC) once daily (QD) plus 600 mg efavirenz QD |
| TDF/FTC FDC | Tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg FDC once daily (QD) plus 600 mg efavirenz QD |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| ABC/3TC FDC | TDF/FTC FDC | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 195 [1] | 197 [2] |
| COMPLETED | 115 | 134 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 80 | 63 |
| Adverse Event | 28 | 26 |
| Insufficient Viral Load Response | 4 | 2 |
| Protocol-defined Virological Failure | 7 | 0 |
| Non-compliance | 2 | 4 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 7 | 8 |
| Treatment Eligibility Criteria Not Met | 3 | 0 |
| Protocol Violation | 7 | 2 |
| Investigator Decision | 4 | 3 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 7 | 7 |
| Disease Progression | 1 | 0 |
| Participant Moved | 2 | 0 |
| Participant not able to perform Week 96 | 1 | 0 |
| Participant moved.Week 96 visit, no scan | 1 | 0 |
| Prohibited Medication | 1 | 2 |
| Participant planning pregnancy | 1 | 0 |
| Participant overweight, no scan possible | 1 | 0 |
| No scan facilities | 0 | 2 |
| Pregnancy | 0 | 3 |
| Not Exposed to Study Drug | 3 | 4 |
| [1] | Three participants were randomized but were not exposed to study drug (ABC/3TC). |
|---|---|
| [2] | Four participants were randomized but were not exposed to study drug (TDF/FTC). |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ABC/3TC FDC | Abacavir (ABC) 600 mg/lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg fixed dose combination (FDC) once daily (QD) plus 600 mg efavirenz QD |
| TDF/FTC FDC | Tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg FDC once daily (QD) plus 600 mg efavirenz QD |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| ABC/3TC FDC | TDF/FTC FDC | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
192 | 193 | 385 |
|
Age
[1] [units: Years] Median ( Full Range ) |
38.0
( 19 to 70 ) |
36.0
( 18 to 66 ) |
37.0
( 18 to 70 ) |
|
Gender
[1] [units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 33 | 40 | 73 |
| Male | 159 | 153 | 312 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[1] [units: participants] |
|||
| African American/African Heritage | 26 | 30 | 56 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 11 | 7 | 18 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| White | 153 | 151 | 304 |
| [1] | The Intent-to-Treat (ITT)-Exposed (E) Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, was used for all baseline characteristics. |
|---|
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72 m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ] |
| 24. Secondary: | Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Week 96 ] |
| 25. Secondary: | Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ] |
| 26. Secondary: | Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48 ] |
| 27. Secondary: | Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96 ] |
| 28. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 29. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 30. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 31. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 32. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 33. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 34. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 35. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 36. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 37. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 38. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 39. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 40. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] |
| 41. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ] |
| 42. Secondary: | Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Week 96 ] |
| 43. Secondary: | Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] |
| 44. Secondary: | Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ] |
| 45. Secondary: | Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Week 96 ] |
| 46. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 47. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48 ] |
| 48. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 49. Secondary: | Number of Participants Classified as Protocol-defined Failures With Treatment-emergent Resistance to Study Drug in the Indicated Viruses at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Week 96 ] |
| 50. Secondary: | Number of Participants Who Indicated "Yes" or "No" to the Question of Whether Unplanned Healthcare Resources Were Utilized [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96 ] |
| 51. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Albumin as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 52. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Beta 2 Microglobulin (B2M) as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 53. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in N-acetyl-B-glucosaminidase (NAG) as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 54. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 55. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 Amino-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 56. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen Cross-linked C-telopeptide at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 57. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
| 58. Other Pre-specified: | Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96 ] |
Serious Adverse Events| Time Frame | No text entered. |
|---|---|
| Additional Description | Serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ABC/3TC FDC | Abacavir (ABC) 600 mg/lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg fixed dose combination (FDC) once daily (QD) plus 600 mg efavirenz QD |
| TDF/FTC FDC | Tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg FDC once daily (QD) plus 600 mg efavirenz QD |
Serious Adverse Events
| ABC/3TC FDC | TDF/FTC FDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Total, serious adverse events | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 31/192 (16.15%) | 20/193 (10.36%) |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
| Neutropenia † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Cardiac disorders | ||
| Acute myocardial infarction † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | ||
| Porphyria non-acute † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Endocrine disorders | ||
| Goitre † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
| Abdominal hernia † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Diverticulum † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Gastritis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Rectal haemorrhage † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| General disorders | ||
| Pyrexia † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Hepatobiliary disorders | ||
| Cholecystitis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Cholelithiasis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Cholestasis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Cytolytic hepatitis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Hepatitis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Immune system disorders | ||
| Drug hypersensitivity † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 5/192 (2.60%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Hypersensitivity † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 3/192 (1.56%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Immune reconstitution syndrome † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 2/192 (1.04%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Infections and infestations | ||
| Pneumonia † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 5/192 (2.60%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Gastroenteritis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 2/192 (1.04%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Lower respiratory tract infection † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Pulmonary tuberculosis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Abscess limb † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Endocarditis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Erysipelas † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Eye infection toxoplasmal † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Herpes Zoster † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Scrotal abscess † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Staphylococcal abscess † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Tuberculosis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Viral infection † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
| Accidental overdose † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Ankle fracture † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Forearm fracture † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Humerus fracture † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Meniscus lesion † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Investigations | ||
| Cardiac murmur † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||
| Dehydration † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
| Back pain † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Osteoarthritis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||
| Burkitt's lymphoma † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Lymphoma † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Thymoma † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Nervous system disorders | ||
| Convulsion † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Transient ischaemic attack † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Psychiatric disorders | ||
| Acute stress disorder † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Apathy † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Renal and urinary disorders | ||
| Renal failure † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||
| Epididymitis † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 0/192 (0.00%) | 1/193 (0.52%) |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
| Asthma † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
| Rash maculo-papular † 1 | ||
| # participants affected / at risk | 1/192 (0.52%) | 0/193 (0.00%) |
| † | Events were collected by systematic assessment |
|---|---|
| 1 | Term from vocabulary, MedDRA |
Other Adverse Events
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Publications:
Post FA, Moyle GJ, Stellbrink HJ, et al. Randomized comparison of renal effects, efficacy, and safety with once-daily abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine, administered with efavirenz, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT study. [JAIDS]. 2010;55(1):49-57.
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Cheri Hudson; Clinical Disclosure Advisor, GSK Clinical Disclosure |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00549198 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CNA109586 |
| Study First Received: | October 24, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | September 23, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | April 7, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Austria: Agency for Health and Food Safety Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Belgium: The Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment |