HIV Testing Strategies in the Perinatal Setting
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborator:
Pfizer
Information provided by:
University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00503308
First received: July 16, 2007
Last updated: June 7, 2011
Last verified: June 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: September 24, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single Blind (Subject); Primary Purpose: Health Services Research |
| Conditions: |
HIV Infections Pregnancy Related |
| Intervention: |
Procedure: Abbreviated HIV test counseling |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| A randomized-controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted from October 2006 through February 2008 at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH), the public teaching hospital of the City and County of San Francisco. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| A total of 278 English- and Spanish-speaking pregnant women were randomized to receive either abbreviated or standard nurse-performed HIV test counseling at the initial prenatal visit. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Standard Consenting Intervention | The standardized HIV pre-test counseling and consent process took approximately 2–5 minutes and reviewed the definition of HIV, modes of transmission and prevention, interpretation of test results and the benefits of testing. |
| Abbreviated Consenting Intervention | The intervention arm used a 2-sentence script which lasted approximately 30 seconds. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Standard Consenting Intervention | Abbreviated Consenting Intervention | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 146 | 135 |
| COMPLETED | 144 | 134 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 2 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Standard Consenting Intervention | The standardized HIV pre-test counseling and consent process took approximately 2–5 minutes and reviewed the definition of HIV, modes of transmission and prevention, interpretation of test results and the benefits of testing. |
| Abbreviated Consenting Intervention | The intervention arm used a 2-sentence script which lasted approximately 30 seconds. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Standard Consenting Intervention | Abbreviated Consenting Intervention | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
146 | 135 | 281 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 138 | 130 | 268 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
26.99 ± 6.1 | 26.39 ± 5.3 | 26.7 ± 5.73 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 146 | 135 | 281 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 146 | 135 | 281 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Satisfaction With HIV Testing Experience (O'Connor Decisional Conflict Scale) [ Time Frame: same day as HIV test counseling (cross-sectional study) ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 1| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Satisfaction With HIV Testing Experience (O'Connor Decisional Conflict Scale) |
| Measure Description | We measured decisional conflict, the primary outcome of the study, using the English or Spanish language 10-item Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale. We considered a DCS score of 25 or less to be low, corresponding to limited conflict. All questions have 3 response categories: yes, no, unsure. Items are scored as 0 = yes, 2 = unsure, 4 = no. Scores for each of the 10 items are summed, divided by 2 and multiplied by 25 to calculate the total score. The final scores range from 0(no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). |
| Time Frame | same day as HIV test counseling (cross-sectional study) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Standard Consenting Intervention | The standardized HIV pre-test counseling and consent process took approximately 2–5 minutes and reviewed the definition of HIV, modes of transmission and prevention, interpretation of test results and the benefits of testing. |
| Abbreviated Consenting Intervention | The intervention arm used a 2-sentence script which lasted approximately 30 seconds. |
Measured Values
| Standard Consenting Intervention | Abbreviated Consenting Intervention | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
144 | 134 |
|
Satisfaction With HIV Testing Experience (O'Connor Decisional Conflict Scale)
[units: scoresĀ onĀ scale] Mean ( 95% Confidence Interval ) |
16.0
( 13.1 to 18.9 ) |
19.9
( 16.3 to 23.5 ) |
No statistical analysis provided for Satisfaction With HIV Testing Experience (O'Connor Decisional Conflict Scale)
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Deborah Cohan, MD
Organization: UCSF, San Francisco General Hospital
phone: 415 206 3658
e-mail: cohand@obgyn.ucsf.edu
Organization: UCSF, San Francisco General Hospital
phone: 415 206 3658
e-mail: cohand@obgyn.ucsf.edu
Publications:
Shapiro DE, Tuomala R, Samelson R, et al. Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission Rates According to Antiretroviral Therapy, Mode of Delivery, and Viral Load (PACTG 367): Abstract #114. 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Seattle, WA, 2002.
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Deborah Cohan, UCSF |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00503308 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2004-0319 |
| Study First Received: | July 16, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | September 24, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | June 7, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |