REQUIP (Ropinirole Hydrochloride) IR Long-Term Phase 4 Study
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00485069
First received: June 11, 2007
Last updated: November 18, 2010
Last verified: November 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: September 20, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Parkinson Disease Parkinson's Disease |
| Interventions: |
Drug: ROP Drug: ROP+L-Dopa |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| 52 weeks of Treatment Phase, consisting of 4 weeks of Fixed Titration Phase and 48 weeks of Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, was started after 1 to 4 weeks of Screening Phase. Although the results are presented by participants with and without L-dopa, this study was a single-arm design, and L-dopa was not the investigational product. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Participants received ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day and was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study. |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day and was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| ROP+L-Dopa | Ropinirole Hydrochloride | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 65 | 58 |
| COMPLETED | 47 | 46 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 18 | 12 |
| Adverse Event | 10 | 4 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 6 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Participants received ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study. |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| ROP+L-Dopa | Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
65 | 58 | 123 |
|
Age
[units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
66.0 ± 7.94 | 65.5 ± 7.18 | 65.8 ± 7.56 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 27 | 31 | 58 |
| Male | 38 | 27 | 65 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| Asian - Japanese Heritage | 65 | 58 | 123 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in "On" State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 5| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP |
| Measure Description | The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS. LOCF was used for the FAP data to impute post-baseline missing values. One participant was not included in the ROP+L-dopa group at FAP as having no post-baseline data. This participant as well as those prematurely withdrawn from the study in each group was not included at Week 52. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study. |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study. |
Measured Values
| ROP+L-Dopa | Ropinirole Hydrochloride | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
65 | 58 |
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Week 52, n=47, 46 | 0.1 ± 1.54 | 0.3 ± 1.24 |
| FAP, n=64, 58 | 0.3 ± 1.75 | 0.3 ± 1.15 |
No statistical analysis provided for Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP
| 6. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in "On" State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in "On" State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Days 0-422 ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Days 0-419 ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Week 52 and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time "Off" (Hours) and Awake Time "On" (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With "0" Off (Hour) at Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | E.D. Derilus; Clinical Disclosure Advisor, GSK Clinical Disclosure |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00485069 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 108862 |
| Study First Received: | June 11, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | September 20, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | November 18, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare |