REQUIP (Ropinirole Hydrochloride) IR Long-Term Phase 4 Study
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00485069
First received: June 11, 2007
Last updated: November 18, 2010
Last verified: November 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: September 20, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Parkinson Disease Parkinson's Disease |
| Interventions: |
Drug: ROP Drug: ROP+L-Dopa |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| 52 weeks of Treatment Phase, consisting of 4 weeks of Fixed Titration Phase and 48 weeks of Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, was started after 1 to 4 weeks of Screening Phase. Although the results are presented by participants with and without L-dopa, this study was a single-arm design, and L-dopa was not the investigational product. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Participants received ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day and was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study. |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day and was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals of at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| ROP+L-Dopa | Ropinirole Hydrochloride | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 65 | 58 |
| COMPLETED | 47 | 46 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 18 | 12 |
| Adverse Event | 10 | 4 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 6 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ROP+L-Dopa | Participants received ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP) tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 milligrams (mg)/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. The dosing regimen of L-dopa remained unchanged from 4 weeks prior to the start of the Screening Phase throughout the study. |
| Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Participants received ROP tablets 3 times daily. In the 4-week Fixed Titration Phase (from Week 0 as Baseline), the dose started at 0.75 mg/day was increased weekly by 0.75 mg/day up to 3.0 mg/day. In the 48-week Flexible Titration and Maintenance Phase, the dose was increased by 1.5 mg/day at intervals at least 1 week up to a maximum of 15.0 mg/day. The dose was maintained at a level without further symptomatic improvement expected. Concomitant use of L-dopa was prohibited during the study. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| ROP+L-Dopa | Ropinirole Hydrochloride | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
65 | 58 | 123 |
|
Age
[units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
66.0 ± 7.94 | 65.5 ± 7.18 | 65.8 ± 7.56 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 27 | 31 | 58 |
| Male | 38 | 27 | 65 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| Asian - Japanese Heritage | 65 | 58 | 123 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score (in "On" State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and Final Assessment Point (FAP) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part I Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part II Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part II Total Score at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part III Mean Total Score (in "On" State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score (in "On" State for the ROP+L-Dopa Group) at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Japanese UPDRS Part IV Mean Total Score at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale at Baseline, Week 52, and FAP in the ROP Group ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP by "On"/"Off" State in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale Score by Clinician at Week 52 and FAP in ROP Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP+L-Dopa Group [ Time Frame: Days 0-422 ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days in the ROP Group [ Time Frame: Days 0-419 ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Number of Participants Scored as Responders on the Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scale at Week 52 and FAP [ Time Frame: Week 52 and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in Awake Time "Off" (Hours) and Awake Time "On" (Hours) at Week 52 and FAP in the ROP+L-Dopa Group Excluding Participants With "0" Off (Hour) at Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, and FAP (up to Week 52) ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | E.D. Derilus; Clinical Disclosure Advisor, GSK Clinical Disclosure |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00485069 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 108862 |
| Study First Received: | June 11, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | September 20, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | November 18, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare |