|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment |
| Condition: |
Tuberculosis |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Gatifloxacin Drug: Isoniazid Drug: Levofloxacin Drug: Linezolid Drug: Moxifloxacin |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Screening for the trial began in February 2004 in Vitória, Brazil. Non-HIV infected adults aged 18-65 years with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) were recruited at local TB posts and the Hospital Universitario Cassiano Antonio de Moraes of the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) in Vitória. Enrollment was completed in October 2007. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| A total of 113 adults with suspected pulmonary TB were evaluated for study participation. Forty-three were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria, leaving a total of 70 patients. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Gatifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Gatifloxacin 400 mg/day x 7 days |
| Levofloxacin 1000 mg/Day | Levofloxacin 1000 mg/day x 7days |
| Linezolid 600 mg / Once Daily | Linezolid 600 mg/once daily x 7days |
| Linezolid 600 mg / Twice Daily | Linezolid 600 mg twice daily x 7 days |
| Moxifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Moxifloxacin 400 mg/day x 7 days |
| Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/Day | Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/day x 7 days |
| Gatifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Levofloxacin 1000 mg/Day | Linezolid 600 mg / Once Daily | Linezolid 600 mg / Twice Daily | Moxifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/Day | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| COMPLETED | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 18 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Gatifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Gatifloxacin 400 mg/day x 7 days |
| Levofloxacin 1000 mg/Day | Levofloxacin 1000 mg/day x 7days |
| Linezolid 600 mg / Once Daily | Linezolid 600 mg/once daily x 7days |
| Linezolid 600 mg / Twice Daily | Linezolid 600 mg twice daily x 7 days |
| Moxifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Moxifloxacin 400 mg/day x 7 days |
| Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/Day | Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/day x 7 days |
| Gatifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Levofloxacin 1000 mg/Day | Linezolid 600 mg / Once Daily | Linezolid 600 mg / Twice Daily | Moxifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/Day | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants [units: participants] |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 70 |
|
Age [units: participants] |
|||||||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 70 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Age [units: years] Median ( Inter-Quartile Range ) |
34.5 ( 27.0 to 40.0 ) |
43.5 ( 42.0 to 46.0 ) |
33.5 ( 23.0 to 42.0 ) |
45.0 ( 39.0 to 48.0 ) |
35.0 ( 25.0 to 37.0 ) |
33.0 ( 23.0 to 43.5 ) |
35.0 ( 26.0 to 44.0 ) |
|
Gender [units: participants] |
|||||||
| Female | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
| Male | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 59 |
|
Region of Enrollment [units: participants] |
|||||||
| Brazil | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 70 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Sputum Bacillary Loads: Adjusted Area Under the Curve (aAUC) [ Study drug administration duration - 7 days monotherapy ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 1| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Sputum Bacillary Loads: Adjusted Area Under the Curve (aAUC) |
| Measure Description | The adjusted area under the curve (aAUC) for sputum colony forming units (cfu) for each day on treatment was calculated. The aAUC represents the percentage of the expected AUC given no change in log cfu in response to study drug administration. |
| Time Frame | Study drug administration duration - 7 days monotherapy |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The aAUC was calculated for 10 subjects per treatment arm (n=40). |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Gatifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Gatifloxacin 400 mg/day x 7 days |
| Levofloxacin 1000 mg/Day | Levofloxacin 1000 mg/day x 7days |
| Moxifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Moxifloxacin 400 mg/day x 7 days |
| Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/Day | Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/day x 7 days |
| Gatifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Levofloxacin 1000 mg/Day | Moxifloxacin 400 mg/Day | Isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/Day | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
|
Sputum Bacillary Loads: Adjusted Area Under the Curve (aAUC)
[units: Percentage] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||||
| Day 1 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 0.95 ± 0.03 |
| Day 2 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.94 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.04 |
| Day 3 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.04 |
| Day 4 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 0.84 ± 0.04 |
| Day 5 | 0.87 ± 0.08 | 0.85 ± 0.09 | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 0.81 ± 0.05 |
| Day 6 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 0.85 ± 0.10 | 0.80 ± 0.06 |
| Day 7 | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 0.80 ± 0.06 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mean adjusted aAUC for all 4 treatment groups over the 7 days of study drug administration | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.041 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 1. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.008 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 2. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.012 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 3. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.01 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 4. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.03 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 5. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.091 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 6. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.354 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Day 7. Pooled sputum bacillary load data for patients in the 3 fluoroquinolones arms were combined and compared to that of patients in the INH arm. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| 2. Primary: | Difference in Sputum Bacillary Loads: Early Bactericidal Activity (EBA) Days 0 to 2; Fluoroquinolones/Isoniazid (INH) Comparison [ Day 0 to Day 2 Monotherapy ] |
| 3. Primary: | Extended Early Bactericidal Activity (EBA) From Days 2 to 7; Fluoroquinolones/Isoniazid (INH) Comparison [ Day 2 to Day 7 Monotherapy ] |
| 4. Primary: | Sputum Bacillary Loads: Adjusted Area Under the Curve (aAUC) [ Study drug administration duration - 7 days monotherapy ] |
| 5. Primary: | Difference in Sputum Bacillary Loads: Early Bactericidal Activity (EBA) Days 0 to 2; Linezolid Once Daily/Linezolid Twice Daily/Isoniazid (INH) Comparison [ Day 0 to Day 2 Monotherapy ] |
| 6. Primary: | Difference in Sputum Bacillary Loads: Extended Early Bactericidal Activity (EBA) From Days 2 to 7; Linezolid Once Daily/Linezolid Twice Daily/INH Comparison [ Day 2 to Day 7 Monotherapy ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Time to Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) and Half-life [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC) During First 12 and 24 Hours [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Area Under the Curve During First 12 or 24 Hours / Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC/MIC) [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Time to Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) and Half-life [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Area Under the Curve During First 12 and 24 Hours [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentrations (Cmax), Adjusted for Free Drug Concentration [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC) Adjusted for Free Drug Concentrations [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Area Under the Curve (AUC) During First 12 and 24 Hours Adjusted for Free Drug Concentrations [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Area Under the Curve (AUC) Adjusted for Free Drug Concentrations/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Percent Dosing Interval Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) [ Day 5 (7 time points) ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| The small sample size had limited power to detect small differences in EBA between study arms even though we enrolled patients with smear-positive TB and high sputum bacillary burden to improve chances of detecting differences between treatment arms. |
| Responsible Party: | HHS/NIAID/DMID ( Robert Johnson ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | 01-553, TBRU 10 |
| Study First Received: | November 3, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | November 19, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | November 19, 2009 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00396084 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board; Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research; United States: Food and Drug Administration; United States: Federal Government |