Now Available for Public Comment: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for FDAAA 801 and NIH Draft Reporting Policy for NIH-Funded Trials

Investigating the Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) & Anti-inflammatory Effect of Chloroquine

This study has been terminated.
(Insufficient financial support; lack of efficacy for primary endpoint)
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Minnesota Medical Foundation
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00308620
First received: March 27, 2006
Last updated: July 9, 2012
Last verified: May 2012
Results First Received: September 26, 2011  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: HIV Infections
Interventions: Drug: chloroquine phosphate
Drug: Placebo

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
2006-2008 recruitment of volunteers in HIV care but electing to not receive ART.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Chloroquine 500mg Chloroquine 500mg PO once daily x 8 weeks
Placebo Placebo once daily for 8 weeks
Chloroquine 250mg Chloroquine 250mg PO once daily x 8 weeks

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Chloroquine 500mg     Placebo     Chloroquine 250mg  
STARTED     3     4     6  
COMPLETED     2     3     5  
NOT COMPLETED     1     1     1  
Death                 1                 1                 0  
Lost to Follow-up                 0                 0                 1  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Chloroquine 500mg Chloroquine 500mg PO once daily x 8 weeks
Placebo Placebo once daily for 8 weeks
Chloroquine 250mg Chloroquine 250mg PO once daily x 8 weeks
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    Chloroquine 500mg     Placebo     Chloroquine 250mg     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  3     4     6     13  
Age  
[units: participants]
       
<=18 years     0     0     0     0  
Between 18 and 65 years     3     4     6     13  
>=65 years     0     0     0     0  
Age  
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  40  ± 15     34  ± 5     36  ± 5     36.5  ± 8.0  
Gender  
[units: participants]
       
Female     0     1     0     1  
Male     3     3     6     12  
Region of Enrollment  
[units: participants]
       
United States     3     4     6     13  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   HIV Viral Load Change   [ Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks ]

2.  Secondary:   Change in Immune Activation Assessed by Flow Cytometry Analysis From Baseline to 8 Weeks   [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Hide Other Adverse Events

Time Frame No text entered.
Additional Description No text entered.

Frequency Threshold
Threshold above which other adverse events are reported   0%  

Reporting Groups
  Description
Chloroquine 500mg Chloroquine 500mg PO once daily x 8 weeks
Placebo Placebo once daily for 8 weeks
Chloroquine 250mg Chloroquine 250mg PO once daily x 8 weeks

Other Adverse Events
    Chloroquine 500mg     Placebo     Chloroquine 250mg  
Total, other (not including serious) adverse events        
# participants affected / at risk     0/3     0/4     0/6  



  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information