A Study to Evaluate Rituximab in Combination With Methotrexate in Methotrexate-Naive Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (IMAGE)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Rheumatoid Arthritis |
| Interventions: |
Drug: folate Drug: methotrexate Drug: methylprednisolone Drug: placebo Drug: rituximab |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo + Methotrexate |
Placebo intravenously on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. From Week 104 participants were eligible to receive Rituximab 2 X 0.5 g or Rituximab 2 X 1.0 g every 24 weeks. |
| Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate |
Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 0.5 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6 |
| Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate |
Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 1.0 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6 |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Placebo + Methotrexate | Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate | Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 251 | 252 | 252 |
| Safety/ITT: Received Study Drug | 249 | 249 | 250 |
| Completed Week 24 | 227 | 240 | 241 |
| Completed Week 52 | 213 | 227 | 232 |
| Completed Week 104 | 178 | 213 | 216 |
| COMPLETED | 62 [1] | 77 | 80 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 189 | 175 | 172 |
| Adverse Event | 14 | 9 | 7 |
| Death | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Insufficient therapeutic response | 34 | 13 | 8 |
| Failure to return | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Violation of selection criteria | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Refused treatment | 9 | 2 | 2 |
| Withdrew consent | 14 | 19 | 9 |
| Administrative reasons | 106 | 120 | 137 |
| [1] | Completed Week 152 |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo + Methotrexate |
Placebo intravenously on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. From Week 104 participants were eligible to receive Rituximab 2 X 0.5 g or Rituximab 2 X 1.0 g every 24 weeks. |
| Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate |
Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 0.5 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6 |
| Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate |
Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 1.0 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6 |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Placebo + Methotrexate | Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate | Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
249 | 249 | 250 | 748 |
|
Age
[1] [units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
48.06 ± 12.692 | 47.87 ± 13.391 | 47.89 ± 13.324 | 47.94 ± 13.136 |
|
Gender
[1] [units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 192 | 203 | 212 | 607 |
| Male | 57 | 46 | 38 | 141 |
| [1] | Intent-to-treat population |
|---|
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) From Screening at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 52 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp Erosion Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 52 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients Without Radiographic Progression at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients Without Radiographic Progression in Total Erosion Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 52 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 7| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24 |
| Measure Description | Total Erosion Score is determined by evaluation of fourteen sites in each wrist and hand and six joints in each foot using an eight-point scale from 0 (normal: no erosions) to 3.5 (Very severe; erosions of 100% of the articular surfaces. The Total Erosion Score at Week 24 - Total Erosion Score at baseline is calculated. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants from the modified intent-to-treat population (includes patients with a screening and at least one post-baseline radiographic evaluation, grouped as randomized) who had data available at Week 24 for analysis. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo + Methotrexate |
Placebo intravenously on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. From Week 104 participants were eligible to receive Rituximab 2 X 0.5 g or Rituximab 2 X 1.0 g every 24 weeks. |
| Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate |
Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 0.5 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6 |
| Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate |
Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 1.0 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8. Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6 |
Measured Values
| Placebo + Methotrexate | Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate | Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
226 | 238 | 242 |
|
Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24
[units: Score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.491 ± 1.3789 | 0.404 ± 1.0390 | 0.220 ± 0.5802 |
No statistical analysis provided for Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24
| 8. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR50 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR70 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 15. Secondary: | The Percentage of Participants With Major Clinical Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Low Disease Activity at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR20 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR90 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From Baseline at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Health Component Summary Score at Week 52 and Week 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, Week 104 ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score at Week 52 and Week 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 52, Week 104 ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With Categorical Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 24. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients With Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the SF-36 Physical Health Component Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 25. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients With Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the SF-36 Mental Health Component Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 26. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ] |
| 27. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ] |
| 28. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression at Week 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ] |
| 29. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression in the Total Erosion Score at Week 104 [ Time Frame: Week 104 ] |
| 30. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Organization: Genentech, Inc.
phone: 800-821-8590
No publications provided by Genentech
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Genentech |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00299104 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | U3373g, WA17047 |
| Study First Received: | March 2, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | November 16, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | July 20, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |