A Study to Evaluate Rituximab in Combination With Methotrexate in Methotrexate-Naive Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (IMAGE)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Hoffmann-La Roche
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Genentech
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00299104
First received: March 2, 2006
Last updated: July 20, 2012
Last verified: July 2012
Results First Received: November 16, 2009  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions: Drug: folate
Drug: methotrexate
Drug: methylprednisolone
Drug: placebo
Drug: rituximab

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Placebo + Methotrexate

Placebo intravenously on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

From Week 104 participants were eligible to receive Rituximab 2 X 0.5 g or Rituximab 2 X 1.0 g every 24 weeks.

Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate

Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 0.5 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6

Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate

Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 1.0 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6


Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Placebo + Methotrexate     Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate     Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate  
STARTED     251     252     252  
Safety/ITT: Received Study Drug     249     249     250  
Completed Week 24     227     240     241  
Completed Week 52     213     227     232  
Completed Week 104     178     213     216  
COMPLETED     62 [1]   77     80  
NOT COMPLETED     189     175     172  
Adverse Event                 14                 9                 7  
Death                 1                 1                 1  
Insufficient therapeutic response                 34                 13                 8  
Failure to return                 9                 8                 8  
Violation of selection criteria                 1                 2                 0  
Protocol Violation                 1                 1                 0  
Refused treatment                 9                 2                 2  
Withdrew consent                 14                 19                 9  
Administrative reasons                 106                 120                 137  
[1] Completed Week 152



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Placebo + Methotrexate

Placebo intravenously on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

From Week 104 participants were eligible to receive Rituximab 2 X 0.5 g or Rituximab 2 X 1.0 g every 24 weeks.

Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate

Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 0.5 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6

Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate

Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 1.0 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6

Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    Placebo + Methotrexate     Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate     Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  249     249     250     748  
Age [1]
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  48.06  ± 12.692     47.87  ± 13.391     47.89  ± 13.324     47.94  ± 13.136  
Gender [1]
[units: participants]
       
Female     192     203     212     607  
Male     57     46     38     141  
[1] Intent-to-treat population



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) From Screening at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 52 ]

2.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp Erosion Score at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 52 ]

3.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients Without Radiographic Progression at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

4.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients Without Radiographic Progression in Total Erosion Score at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 52 ]

6.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 24   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ]

7.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 7

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24
Measure Description Total Erosion Score is determined by evaluation of fourteen sites in each wrist and hand and six joints in each foot using an eight-point scale from 0 (normal: no erosions) to 3.5 (Very severe; erosions of 100% of the articular surfaces. The Total Erosion Score at Week 24 - Total Erosion Score at baseline is calculated.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Participants from the modified intent-to-treat population (includes patients with a screening and at least one post-baseline radiographic evaluation, grouped as randomized) who had data available at Week 24 for analysis.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Placebo + Methotrexate

Placebo intravenously on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

From Week 104 participants were eligible to receive Rituximab 2 X 0.5 g or Rituximab 2 X 1.0 g every 24 weeks.

Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate

Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 0.5 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6

Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate

Rituximab intravenously at a dose of 1.0 g on Days 1 and 15 + a background of methotrexate orally at a dose of 7.5 mg escalating by 2.5 mg a week every 1-2 weeks to achieve: 15 mg per week by Week 4 and 20 mg per week by Week 8.

Subsequent Rituximab treatment courses were given at 24 week intervals for 5 years provided the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS-ESR) result was ≥2.6


Measured Values
    Placebo + Methotrexate     Rituximab (0.5 g x 2) + Methotrexate     Rituximab (1.0 g x 2) + Methotrexate  
Number of Participants Analyzed  
[units: participants]
  226     238     242  
Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24  
[units: Score on a scale]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  0.491  ± 1.3789     0.404  ± 1.0390     0.220  ± 0.5802  

No statistical analysis provided for Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24



8.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score at Week 24   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ]

9.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression at Week 24   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ]

10.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR50 Response at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]

11.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

12.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR70 Response at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

13.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]

14.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

15.  Secondary:   The Percentage of Participants With Major Clinical Response at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]

16.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Low Disease Activity at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]

17.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR20 Response at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

18.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR90 Response at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

19.  Secondary:   Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From Baseline at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

20.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

21.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Health Component Summary Score at Week 52 and Week 104   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52, Week 104 ]

22.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score at Week 52 and Week 104   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 52, Week 104 ]

23.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Categorical Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

24.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients With Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the SF-36 Physical Health Component Score at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

25.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients With Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the SF-36 Mental Health Component Score at Week 52   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ]

26.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 104   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ]

27.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 104   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ]

28.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression at Week 104   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ]

29.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression in the Total Erosion Score at Week 104   [ Time Frame: Week 104 ]

30.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 104   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 104 ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Medical Communications
Organization: Genentech, Inc.
phone: 800-821-8590


No publications provided by Genentech

Publications automatically indexed to this study:

Responsible Party: Genentech
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00299104     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: U3373g, WA17047
Study First Received: March 2, 2006
Results First Received: November 16, 2009
Last Updated: July 20, 2012
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration