Now Available for Public Comment: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for FDAAA 801 and NIH Draft Reporting Policy for NIH-Funded Trials

Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00267098
First received: December 19, 2005
Last updated: February 20, 2014
Last verified: February 2014
Results First Received: December 18, 2013  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conditions: Atrioventricular Block
Heart Diseases
Intervention: Device: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
No Implant Attempt Subjects who did not undergo an implant attempt of a CRT-P or CRT-D device and were not randomized
Unsuccessful Implants Subjects who underwent an implant attempt of a CRT-P or CRT-D device but were not successfully implanted
CRT-P: Biventricular Pacing Arm Subjects who were implanted with a CRT-P device and randomized to receive biventricular pacing
CRT-P: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm Subjects who were implanted with a CRT-P device and randomized to receive right ventricular pacing
CRT-P: Not Randomized Subjects successfully implanted with a CRT-P device who were not randomized
CRT-D: Biventricular Pacing Arm Subjects implanted with a CRT-D device and randomized to receive biventricular pacing
CRT-D: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm Subjects implanted with a CRT-D device and randomized to receive right ventricular pacing.
CRT-D: Not Randomized Subjects successfully implanted with a CRT-D device who were not randomized

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    No Implant Attempt     Unsuccessful Implants     CRT-P: Biventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-P: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-P: Not Randomized     CRT-D: Biventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-D: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-D: Not Randomized  
STARTED     109     51     243     241     47     106     101     20  
COMPLETED     0     0     149     135     10     66     55     5  
NOT COMPLETED     109     51     94     106     37     40     46     15  
Death                 0                 0                 57                 66                 14                 23                 28                 9  
Lost to Follow-up                 0                 0                 6                 5                 2                 3                 1                 1  
Withdrawal by Subject                 8                 0                 24                 21                 12                 9                 12                 5  
Physician Decision                 5                 0                 7                 11                 5                 4                 3                 0  
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Not Met                 96                 0                 0                 0                 2                 0                 0                 0  
Unsuccessful Implant Exit Per Protocol                 0                 51                 0                 0                 0                 0                 0                 0  
Site closure                 0                 0                 0                 1                 0                 1                 1                 0  
Explanted Medtronic device                 0                 0                 0                 1                 0                 0                 0                 0  
Non-Medtronic LV Lead Implanted                 0                 0                 0                 0                 2                 0                 0                 0  
Subject listed for heart transplant                 0                 0                 0                 0                 0                 0                 1                 0  
Sponsor withdrew subject                 0                 0                 0                 1                 0                 0                 0                 0  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
No Implant Attempt Subjects who did not undergo an implant attempt of a CRT-P or CRT-D device and were not randomized
Unsuccessful Implants Subjects who underwent an implant attempt of a CRT-P or CRT-D device but were not successfully implanted
CRT-P: Biventricular Pacing Arm Subjects who were implanted with a CRT-P device and randomized to receive biventricular pacing
CRT-P: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm Subjects who were implanted with a CRT-P device and randomized to receive right ventricular pacing
CRT-P: Not Randomized Subjects successfully implanted with a CRT-P device who were not randomized
CRT-D: Biventricular Pacing Arm Subjects implanted with a CRT-D device and randomized to receive biventricular pacing
CRT-D: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm Subjects implanted with a CRT-D device and randomized to receive right ventricular pacing.
CRT-D: Not Randomized Subjects successfully implanted with a CRT-D device who were not randomized
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    No Implant Attempt     Unsuccessful Implants     CRT-P: Biventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-P: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-P: Not Randomized     CRT-D: Biventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-D: Right Ventricular Pacing Arm     CRT-D: Not Randomized     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  109     51     243     241     47     106     101     20     918  
Age  
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  70.2  ± 12.6     71.1  ± 11.2     74.4  ± 10.2     73.8  ± 10.8     79.3  ± 7.6     72.0  ± 9.3     71.0  ± 10.0     74.0  ± 9.1     73.2  ± 10.6  
Gender  
[units: participants]
                 
Female     29     14     62     73     18     19     20     4     239  
Male     80     37     181     168     29     87     81     16     679  
Race/Ethnicity, Customized  
[units: participants]
                 
Subject did not offer ethnicity     6     2     6     5     1     4     3     0     27  
African American     10     3     8     10     0     4     4     1     40  
Asian     0     0     0     0     1     0     0     0     1  
Caucasian     91     45     225     224     43     96     90     18     832  
Hispanic     1     0     3     1     2     2     2     1     12  
Native American     0     0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1  
Other     1     1     1     0     0     0     2     0     5  
Region of Enrollment  
[units: participants]
                 
United States     109     46     232     231     47     104     98     19     886  
Canada     0     5     11     10     0     2     3     1     32  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Mortality, Heart Failure-related Urgent Care Visits, or Significant Increase in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

2.  Secondary:   All-Cause Mortality   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

3.  Secondary:   All-Cause Mortality or Heart Failure-related Hospitalization   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

4.  Secondary:   All-Cause Mortality or Significant Increase in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

5.  Secondary:   First Heart Failure Hospitalization   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

6.  Secondary:   Days Hospitalized for Heart Failure   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

7.  Secondary:   Change in New York Heart Association Classification   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

8.  Secondary:   Change in Heart Failure Stage   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

9.  Secondary:   Change in Cardiovascular Medications   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

10.  Secondary:   Frequency of Adverse Events Post-randomization   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

11.  Secondary:   Cardiovascular-related Healthcare Utilizations   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 39.8 months post-randomization. ]

12.  Secondary:   Change in Quality of Life at 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

13.  Secondary:   Change in Quality of Life at 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 months ]

14.  Secondary:   Change in Quality of Life at 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

15.  Secondary:   Change in Quality of Life at 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

16.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

17.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

18.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

19.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

20.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

21.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

22.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

23.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

24.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

25.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

26.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

27.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

28.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Mass (LV Mass) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

29.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Mass (LV Mass) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

30.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Mass (LV Mass) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

31.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular Mass (LV Mass) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

32.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

33.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

34.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

35.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

36.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

37.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

38.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

39.  Secondary:   Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

40.  Secondary:   Change in Mitral Regurgitation From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

41.  Secondary:   Change in Mitral Regurgitation From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

42.  Secondary:   Change in Mitral Regurgitation From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

43.  Secondary:   Change in Mitral Regurgitation From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

44.  Secondary:   Change in Cardiac Index From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

45.  Secondary:   Change in Cardiac Index From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

46.  Secondary:   Change in Cardiac Index From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

47.  Secondary:   Change in Cardiac Index From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

48.  Secondary:   Change in Interventricular Mechanical Delay (IVMD) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

49.  Secondary:   Change in Interventricular Mechanical Delay (IVMD) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

50.  Secondary:   Change in Interventricular Mechanical Delay (IVMD) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

51.  Secondary:   Change in Interventricular Mechanical Delay (IVMD) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

52.  Secondary:   Change in E Wave/A Wave Ratio (E:A Ratio) From Randomization to 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]

53.  Secondary:   Change in E Wave/A Wave Ratio (E:A Ratio) From Randomization to 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

54.  Secondary:   Change in E Wave/A Wave Ratio (E:A Ratio) From Randomization to 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

55.  Secondary:   Change in E Wave/A Wave Ratio (E:A Ratio) From Randomization to 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

56.  Secondary:   Clinical Composite Score at 6 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 56

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Clinical Composite Score at 6 Months
Measure Description The endpoint will be a subject's Clinical Composite Score at 6 months. The Clinical Composite Score is a 3 point score (Worsened, Unchanged, and Improved) based on a number of factors including: whether the subject has died, whether the subject has experienced a heart failure-related hospitalization, whether the subject has discontinued their therapy due to worsening heart failure, whether their New York Heart Association classification has improved or worsened since randomization, and whether they feel moderately or markedly better since randomization.
Time Frame Randomization to 6 Months  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Only randomized subjects in both device groups were included in the analysis of this endpoint, as the analysis was restricted to post-randomization data. Subjects in the "No Implant Attempt", "Unsuccessful Implants", "CRT-P: Not Randomized", and "CRT-D: Not Randomized" subgroups were excluded.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Biventricular Pacing Arm Subjects randomized to receive biventricular pacing
Right Ventricular Pacing Arm Subjects randomized to receive right ventricular pacing.

Measured Values
    Biventricular Pacing Arm     Right Ventricular Pacing Arm  
Number of Participants Analyzed  
[units: participants]
  349     342  
Clinical Composite Score at 6 Months  
[units: participants]
   
Improved     184     133  
Unchanged     83     113  
Worsened     82     96  


Statistical Analysis 1 for Clinical Composite Score at 6 Months
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Posterior probability of mean difference
P Value [3] 0.9985
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 0.1841
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  The null hypothesis is that patients with AV block, NYHA I-III, and LVEF of at most 50% who receive RV pacing have similar Clinical Composite Scores after 6 months compared to similar patients who receive BiV pacing. This was tested against the alternative hypothesis that patients had better scores with BiV pacing than RV pacing. The analysis assigned numerical values (Improved=3, Unchanged=2, Worsened=1) and compared the average score between randomization arms using a one-sided analysis.
[2] Other relevant method information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  The posterior probability that the mean difference is greater than 0 was calculated.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  BLOCK HF is a Bayesian study; a p-value was not used. Instead, a posterior probability, representing the probability that subjects with biventricular pacing have better outcomes, was calculated. A probability ≥ 0.95 was significant.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  This was a one-sided analysis of the BiV arm - RV arm difference in Mean Clinical Composite Scores. Values above 0 suggested better outcomes in the Biventricular arm.



57.  Secondary:   Clinical Composite Score at 12 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 12 Months ]

58.  Secondary:   Clinical Composite Score at 18 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 18 Months ]

59.  Secondary:   Clinical Composite Score at 24 Months   [ Time Frame: Randomization to 24 Months ]

60.  Secondary:   CRT-P and CRT-D System Implant Success   [ Time Frame: Initial Implant Procedure ]

61.  Secondary:   Incidence of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias   [ Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 37.9 months post-randomization among CRT-D subjects. ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: BLOCK HF Clinical Trial Leader
Organization: Medtronic CRDM Clinical
phone: 763-526-2729
e-mail: medtroniccrmtrials@medtronic.com


No publications provided by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management

Publications automatically indexed to this study:

Responsible Party: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00267098     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 215
Study First Received: December 19, 2005
Results First Received: December 18, 2013
Last Updated: February 20, 2014
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration