A Study of Aripiprazole (Abilify) in Patients With Bipolar Mania
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Collaborator:
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
Information provided by:
Bristol-Myers Squibb
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00261443
First received: December 1, 2005
Last updated: April 8, 2011
Last verified: April 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: January 28, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Bipolar Disorder |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Lithium or Valproate with placebo (PBO) Drug: Lithium or Valproate with Aripiprazole |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Pre-Randomized Participants | Phase 1 (2 to 8 Week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase): lithium: 0.6–1.0 mmol/L or valproate 50–125 µg/ml. Phase 2 (13 to 24 Week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase): 10-mg, 15-mg, or 30-mg doses of aripiprazole and lithium: 0.6–1.0 mmol/L or valproate 50–125 µg/ml. |
| Placebo | Phase 3 (52 Week Assessment of Relapse Phase): matching placebo oral tablets and lithium: 0.6–1.0 mmol/L or valproate 50–125 µg/ml. |
| Aripiprazole | Phase 3 (52 Week Assessment of Relapse Phase): 10-mg, 15-mg, or 30-mg doses of aripiprazole and lithium: 0.6–1.0 mmol/L or valproate 50–125 µg/ml. |
Participant Flow for 4 periods
Period 1: 1: Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse
| Pre-Randomized Participants | Placebo | Aripiprazole | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 1270 | 0 | 0 |
| COMPLETED | 686 | 0 | 0 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 584 | 0 | 0 |
| Adverse Event | 33 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 93 | 0 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 111 | 0 | 0 |
| Poor/Noncompliance | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| Pregnancy | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Subject No Longer Met Study Criteria | 307 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Reasons | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Period 2: 2: Stability & Maintenance of Stability
| Pre-Randomized Participants | Placebo | Aripiprazole | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 686 | 0 | 0 |
| COMPLETED | 346 | 0 | 0 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 340 | 0 | 0 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| Adverse Event | 93 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 65 | 0 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| Poor/Noncompliance | 33 | 0 | 0 |
| Pregnancy | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| subject No Longer Met Study Criteria | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Administrative Reason by Sponsor | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Reasons | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Period 3: 3: Assessment of Relapse
| Pre-Randomized Participants | Placebo | Aripiprazole | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 0 | 169 | 168 |
| COMPLETED | 0 | 89 | 103 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 80 | 65 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 31 | 14 |
| Adverse Event | 0 | 15 | 19 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Death | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| Poor/Noncompliance | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Pregnancy | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Subject No Longer Meets Study Criteria | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Administrative Reason By Sponsor | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Other Reasons | 0 | 4 | 3 |
Period 4: 4: Extension Phase
| Pre-Randomized Participants | Placebo | Aripiprazole | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 0 | 19 | 23 |
| COMPLETED | 0 | 16 | 21 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Phase 3 (52 Week Assessment of Relapse Phase): matching placebo oral tablets and 250-mg and 300-mg oral lithium tablets or 250-mg Depakote/valproic acid oral tablets |
| Aripiprazole | Phase 3 (52 Week Assessment of Relapse Phase): aripiprazole 10-mg and 15-mg oral tablets and 250-mg and 300-mg oral lithium tablets or 250-mg Depakote/valproic acid oral tablets |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Placebo | Aripiprazole | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
169 | 168 | 337 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
38.8 ± 12.29 | 39.2 ± 12.43 | 39.0 ± 12.34 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 98 | 87 | 185 |
| Male | 71 | 81 | 152 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| White | 112 | 118 | 230 |
| Black/African American | 19 | 12 | 31 |
| Asian | 33 | 34 | 67 |
| Other | 5 | 4 | 9 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Hispanic/Latino | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 55 | 56 | 111 |
| Non-US | 111 | 107 | 218 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| France | 8 | 9 | 17 |
| United States | 58 | 61 | 119 |
| Czech Republic | 18 | 14 | 32 |
| Brazil | 28 | 27 | 55 |
| Croatia | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Russian Federation | 17 | 15 | 32 |
| South Africa | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| India | 33 | 34 | 67 |
|
Body Mass Index (BMI) Category
[1] [units: Participants] |
|||
| <18.5 kg/m^2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 18.5 kg/m^2 to <25 kg/m^2 | 58 | 49 | 107 |
| 25 kg/m^2 to <30 kg/m^2 | 50 | 63 | 113 |
| >= 30 kg/m^2 | 56 | 56 | 112 |
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
[1] [units: kg/m^2] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
28.7 ± 7.72 | 28.5 ± 6.00 | 28.6 ± 6.90 |
|
CGI-BP Change from Preceding Phase Score (Depression)
[2] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3.0 ± 1.34 | 3.0 ± 1.31 | 3.0 ± 1.32 |
|
CGI-BP Change from Preceding Phase Score (Mania)
[2] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.6 ± 0.81 | 1.4 ± 0.63 | 1.5 ± 0.72 |
|
CGI-BP Change from Preceding Phase Score (Overall)
[2] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.6 ± 0.85 | 1.5 ± 0.69 | 1.6 ± 0.77 |
|
CGI-BP Severity of Illness Score (Depression)
[3] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.3 ± 0.57 | 1.4 ± 0.70 | 1.4 ± 0.64 |
|
CGI-BP Severity of Illness Score (Mania)
[3] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.5 ± 0.72 | 1.5 ± 0.72 | 1.5 ± 0.72 |
|
CGI-BP Severity of Illness Score (Overall)
[3] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.6 ± 0.76 | 1.7 ± 0.83 | 1.6 ± 0.79 |
|
Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
[4] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3.7 ± 3.45 | 4.1 ± 3.82 | 3.9 ± 3.64 |
|
Weight
[units: kg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
81.3 ± 25.11 | 80.6 ± 18.89 | 81.0 ± 22.20 |
|
Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Total Score
[5] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
4.1 ± 3.31 | 4.1 ± 3.56 | 4.1 ± 3.43 |
| [1] | BMI is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. |
|---|---|
| [2] | Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar (CGI-BP) assesses global illness severity and change in patients with bipolar disorder. Patients are rated on Change from Preceding Phase (mania, depression and overall bipolar illness) items (also a 7-point scale (1 to 7), with 1 being very much improved and 7 being very much worse). |
| [3] | Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar (CGI-BP) assesses global illness severity and change in patients with bipolar disorder. Patients are rated on Severity of Illness (mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) items (a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, with 1 being normal, not ill and 7 being very severely ill). |
| [4] | MADRS consists of 10-items, ordinal rating scale The possible total scores are from 0 to 60 (0=no symptoms; 60=most severe symptoms). Change from baseline=postbaseline score - baseline score. A negative change score indicates improvement. |
| [5] | The Y-MRS consists of 11 items: 1) Elevated Mood, 2) Increased Motor Activity -Energy, 3) Sexual Interest, 4) Sleep, 5) Irritability, 6) Speech (Rate and Amount), 7) Language -Thought Disorder, 8) Content, 9) Disruptive-Aggressive Behavior, 10) Appearance, 11) Insight. Seven items are rated on a 0 to 4 scale, while 4 items (items 5, 6, 8 and 9) are rated on a 0 to 8 scale (twice the weight of the other items.) For all items, 0 is the “best” rating and 4 or 8 is the “worst” rating. Total Score is the sum of the ratings for all 11 items. The possible Total Scores are from 0 to 60. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Proportion of Participants Not Experiencing Relapse to Any Mood Episode Through Week 52, Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 of Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Baseline and Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Illness Score (Mania) Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Phase 2), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Proportion of Participants Not Experiencing Relapse of Manic Episode Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 of phase 3 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Proportion of Participants Not Experiencing Relapse of Depressive Episode Through Week 52 During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 of phase 3 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Mean Baseline and Unadjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Total Score Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of ph 1), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 (Ph2) Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, + Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Mean Baseline and Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Total Score Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 2), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 of Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Mean Baseline and Unadjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score Through Phase 2 and at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 (Ph2) Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Mean Baseline and Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 2), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Overall) Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Baseline and Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Overall) Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 2), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Depression) Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Baseline and Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Depression) Score Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 2), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change From Preceding Phase in the CGI-BP (Mania) Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Mania) Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Mania) Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change From Preceding Phase in the CGI-BP (Depression) Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Depression) Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change From Preceding Phase in the CGI-BP (Overall) Through Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 19| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3 |
| Measure Description | Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar (CGI-BP) assesses global illness severity and change from baseline (in this case, preceding phase) in patients with bipolar disorder. Patients are rated on mania, depression and overall bipolar illness items on a 7-point scale [1 to 7], with 1 being very much improved and 7 being very much worse). |
| Time Frame | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| LOCF data set, phase 3 efficacy sample; 4 participants in the Week 4 placebo group were not evaluated. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Phase 3 (52 Week Assessment of Relapse Phase): matching placebo oral tablets and 250-mg and 300-mg oral lithium tablets or 250-mg Depakote/valproic acid oral tablets |
| Aripiprazole | Phase 3 (52 Week Assessment of Relapse Phase): aripiprazole 10-mg and 15-mg oral tablets and 250-mg and 300-mg oral lithium tablets or 250-mg Depakote/valproic acid oral tablets |
Measured Values
| Placebo | Aripiprazole | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
164 | 162 |
|
Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Error |
||
| Mean Change at Week 4 (n=160, 162) | 3.17 ± 0.113 | 3.27 ± 0.110 |
| Mean Change at Week 8 | 3.36 ± 0.118 | 3.22 ± 0.116 |
| Mean Change at Week 12 | 3.34 ± 0.122 | 3.27 ± 0.120 |
| Mean Change at Week 16 | 3.45 ± 0.121 | 3.22 ± 0.119 |
| Mean Change at Week 20 | 3.53 ± 0.125 | 3.31 ± 0.122 |
| Mean Change at Week 24 | 3.60 ± 0.127 | 3.31 ± 0.125 |
| Mean Change at Week 28 | 3.65 ± 0.130 | 3.31 ± 0.127 |
| Mean Change at Week 32 | 3.63 ± 0.130 | 3.29 ± 0.128 |
| Mean Change at Week 36 | 3.61 ± 0.132 | 3.28 ± 0.130 |
| Mean Change at Week 40 | 3.54 ± 0.133 | 3.24 ± 0.131 |
| Mean Change at Week 44 | 3.57 ± 0.135 | 3.28 ± 0.132 |
| Mean Change at Week 48 | 3.63 ± 0.136 | 3.26 ± 0.134 |
| Mean Change at Week 52 | 3.58 ± 0.138 | 3.25 ± 0.135 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.488 |
| Difference [4] | 0.10 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.19 to 0.40 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 4 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.349 |
| Difference [4] | -0.15 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.46 to 0.16 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 8 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.653 |
| Difference [4] | -0.07 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.39 to 0.25 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 12 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 4 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.141 |
| Difference [4] | -0.24 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.56 to 0.08 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 16 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 5 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.196 |
| Difference [4] | -0.22 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.54 to 0.11 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 20 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 6 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.088 |
| Difference [4] | -0.29 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.62 to 0.04 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 24 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 7 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.047 |
| Difference [4] | -0.34 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.68 to -0.01 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 28 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 8 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.057 |
| Difference [4] | -0.33 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.67 to 0.01 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 32 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 9 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.063 |
| Difference [4] | -0.33 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.68 to 0.02 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 36 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 10 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.091 |
| Difference [4] | -0.30 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.65 to 0.05 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 40 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 11 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.105 |
| Difference [4] | -0.29 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.64 to 0.06 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 44 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 12 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.047 |
| Difference [4] | -0.36 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.72 to -0.01 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 48 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 13 for Adjusted Mean Change in CGI-BP From Preceding Phase (Overall) Through Phase 3
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA/ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.073 |
| Difference [4] | -0.33 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.69 to 0.03 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Aripiprazole - Placebo; Week 52 Comparison | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Means, differences in means, 95% CI for the differences, and p-values are based on the ANOVA/ANCOVA model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| Mean change from baseline: ANOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline value. Mean change from preceding phase: ANCOVA controlling for treatment, mood stabilizer, type of index mood episode, baseline CGI-BP. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 20. Secondary: | Number of Participants Maintaining Remission During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Proportion of Participants Discontinuing For Any Reason Through Week 52 (During Phase 3) [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: During Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events in >=5 Percent of Participants, by Severity, During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: During Phase 2. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 24. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 25. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 26. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 27. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in ECG Measurements During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 28. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Vital Sign Measurements During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 29. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) Vital Sign Measurements During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 30. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in Weight Vital Sign Measurements At Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 31. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Vital Sign Measurements at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 32. Secondary: | Median Baseline Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK), and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LD), Phase 2 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 33. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK), and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LD) at the End of Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 34. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Measurements During Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 (a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 35. Secondary: | Median Baseline Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Total Cholesterol-Fasting (TC), Creatine, Glucose, High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Fasting (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Fasting (LDL-C), Bilirubin-Total, Triglycerides, and Uric Acid [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 36. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in BUN, TC, Creatine, Glucose, HDL-C, LDL-C, Bilirubin-Total, Triglycerides, and Uric Acid at the End of Phase 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 37. Secondary: | Median Baseline Eosinophils (Relative) and Neutrophils (Relative) [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 38. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Eosinophils (Relative) and Neutrophils (Relative) [ Time Frame: Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 39. Secondary: | Median Baseline Hemoglobin [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 40. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin [ Time Frame: Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 41. Secondary: | Median Baseline Hematocrit [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 42. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit [ Time Frame: Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 43. Secondary: | Median Baseline Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 (HOMA2)-Percent Beta [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 44. Secondary: | Median Baseline Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 HOMA2-Insulin Resistance (IR) [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 45. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment 2(HOMA2)-Percent Beta at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint (endpoint of a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 46. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in HOMA2 Model Assesses Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint (endpoint of a 13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 47. Secondary: | Median Baseline Platelet Count [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 48. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Platelet Count at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 49. Secondary: | Median Baseline Prolactin [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 50. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Prolactin at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 51. Secondary: | Median Baseline Leukocytes [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 52. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in Leukocytes at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 53. Secondary: | Baseline Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 54. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 55. Secondary: | Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 56. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 57. Secondary: | Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment [ Time Frame: Baseline ] |
| 58. Secondary: | Unadjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Phase 2 Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline (end of Ph 1), Phase 2 Endpoint. Phase 2 (13- to 24-week Stability and Maintenance of Stability Phase, which followed a 2- to 8-week Screening, Washout, and Confirmation of Partial Nonresponse Phase) ] |
| 59. Secondary: | Deaths, Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) in >=2% of Participants, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 60. Secondary: | Treatment-Emergent AEs in >=5% of Participants During Phase 3, by Age, Gender, Race, and Maximum Intensity [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 61. Secondary: | Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 62. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Supine Systolic BP During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 63. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Supine Diastolic BP During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 64. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Supine Heart Rate During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 65. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Sitting Systolic BP During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 66. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Sitting Diastolic BP During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 67. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Sitting Heart Rate During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 68. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Standing Systolic BP During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 69. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Standing Diastolic BP During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 70. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Values in Standing Heart Rate During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, During Phase 3 (for highest/lowest values), Week 52 ] |
| 71. Secondary: | Baseline and Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Weight [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, During Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 72. Secondary: | Number of Participants Showing Relevant Weight Gain During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 52 (LOCF), and throughout Phase 3 (for 'at any time' assessment) ] |
| 73. Secondary: | Number of Participants Showing Relevant Weight Loss During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 52 (LOCF), and throughout Phase 3 (for 'at any time' assessment) ] |
| 74. Secondary: | Median Baseline and Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 52 (LOCF), During Phase 3 (for lowest/highest values) ] |
| 75. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 76. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 77. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in ALT, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 78. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in AST, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 79. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in BUN, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 80. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Total Cholesterol (Fasting), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 81. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Creatine Kinase, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 82. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Creatinine, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 83. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Eosinophils (Relative), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 84. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Glucose (Fasting), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 85. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Lowest Value of Change in Hemoglobin, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for lowest value) ] |
| 86. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Lowest Value of Change in Hematocrit, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for lowest value) ] |
| 87. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Lowest Value of Change in HDL Cholesterol (Fasting), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for lowest value ] |
| 88. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in HOMA2-Percent Beta, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value ] |
| 89. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in HOMA2-IR, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value ] |
| 90. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Lactate Dehydrogenase, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 91. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Change Value in LDL Cholesterol (Fasting), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 92. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Neutrophils (Relative), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 93. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Value of Change in Platelet Count, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest/lowest value) ] |
| 94. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Prolactin, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 95. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Total Bilirubin, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 96. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Triglycerides (Fasting), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 97. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Uric Acid, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 98. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest and Lowest Value of Change in Leukocytes, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest/lowest value) ] |
| 99. Secondary: | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 100. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate (QTc) Bazett, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 101. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in QTc (0.33), Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 102. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in PR, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 103. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in RR, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 104. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in QRS, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 105. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8, 12, 24, 36, 52, throughout Phase 3 (for Highest Value of Change) ] |
| 106. Secondary: | Median Baseline, Change From Baseline, and Highest Value of Change in Heart Rate, Phase 3 Safety Sample [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (LOCF), Throughout Phase 3 (for highest value) ] |
| 107. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in AIMS Total Score During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 52, throughout Phase 3 (for Highest Value of Change) ] |
| 108. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in AIMS Item 8 During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 52, throughout Phase 3 (for Highest Value of Change) ] |
| 109. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in AIMS Item 9 During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 52, throughout Phase 3 (for Highest Value of Change) ] |
| 110. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in AIMS Item 10 During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 52, throughout Phase 3 (for Highest Value of Change) ] |
| 111. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 52, throughout Phase 3 (for Highest Value of Change) ] |
| 112. Secondary: | Number of Participants Taking Concomitant Medications for Potential Treatment of Extrapyramidal Syndrome (EPS) During Phase 3 [ Time Frame: Phase 3 (A 52-Week Assessment of Relapse Phase following Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 113. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Mean Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP (Mania) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72 of LTE Phase. LTE Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 114. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP (Mania) Severity of Illness at Extension Phase Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline, Extension Phase Endpoint. LTE Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 115. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Depression) at Extension Phase Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline, Extension Phase Endpoint. LTE Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 116. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Mean Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Depression) Through Extension Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72. LTE Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 117. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Mean Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Overall) Through Extension Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72. LTE Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 118. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Mean Change From Baseline in CGI-BP Severity of Illness (Overall) at Extension Phase Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline, Extension Phase Endpoint. LTE Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 119. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Deaths, Adverse Events (AES), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations [ Time Frame: From first day until 30 days after the last dose of double-blind dosing in the Extension Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 120. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Metabolic Laboratory Abnormalities During Extension Phase [ Time Frame: From first day until 30 days after the last dose of double-blind dosing in the Extension Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 121. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities [ Time Frame: From first day until 30 days after the last dose of double-blind dosing in the Extension Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 122. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Adverse Events (AEs), by Maximum Intensity [ Time Frame: From first day until 30 days after the last dose of double-blind dosing in the Extension Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 123. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities [ Time Frame: From first day until 30 days after the last dose of double-blind dosing in the Extension Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
| 124. Secondary: | Extension Phase: Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant ECG Abnormalities [ Time Frame: From first day until 30 days after the last dose of double-blind dosing in the Extension Phase (A 72-week Extension Phase [until study unblinding] following Phase 3 [52 weeks], Phase 2 [13 to 24 weeks] and Phase 1 [2 to 8 weeks]) ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Study Director, Bristol-Myers Squibb |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00261443 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CN138-189 |
| Study First Received: | December 1, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | January 28, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | April 8, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |