Abacavir/Lamivudine Versus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Both In Combination With Lopinavir/Ritonavir For The Treatment Of HIV (HEAT)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00244712
First received: October 25, 2005
Last updated: June 3, 2010
Last verified: June 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: April 23, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
HIV Infection |
| Interventions: |
Drug: emtricitabine/tenofovir Drug: abacavir/lamivudine |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Participants were recruited at 76 study sites in the US and 2 study sites in Puerto Rico between 26 July 2005 and 16 June 2006. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| After screening, participants who had never received treatment for HIV-1 infection and had a viral load greater than or equal to 1,000 copies per milliliter of blood and any amount of CD4+ T-cells were equally randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Abacavir/Lamivudine (ABC/3TC) + Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) | 1 tablet (600mg/300mg) ABC/3TC + 800mg/200mg LPV/RTV combination therapy once daily |
| Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) + LPV/RTV | 1 tablet (300mg/200mg) TDF/FTC + 800mg/200mg LPV/RTV combination therapy once daily |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Abacavir/Lamivudine (ABC/3TC) + Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) | Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) + LPV/RTV | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 343 | 345 |
| COMPLETED | 234 | 221 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 109 | 124 |
| Adverse Event | 20 | 21 |
| Protocol-Defined Virologic Failure | 8 | 6 |
| Lack of Compliance | 10 | 11 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 45 | 52 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 13 | 23 |
| Protocol Violation, disease progression | 13 | 11 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 by Missing=Failure (M=F), Switched Included Analysis. [ Time Frame: Week 48 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Week 96 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 in Participants With Baseline HIV-1 RNA <100,000 Copies/mL [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 in Participants With Baseline HIV-1 RNA >=100,000 Copies/mL [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 in Participants With Baseline HIV-1 RNA <100,000 Copies/mL [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 in Participants With Baseline HIV-1 RNA >=100,000 Copies/mL [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 and 96 [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cells at Weeks 48 and 96 [ Time Frame: Weeks 48 and 96 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Number of Participants Who Meet the Protocol-defined Virologic Failure (PDVF) Criteria at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants Who Had Treatment-emergent Genotypic Resistance Through 96 Weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline and time of virologic failure (up to Week 96) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants at Week 96 With Genotypic Resistance to Lamivudine (3TC) and Emtricitabine (FTC) and Had Phenotypic Reduced Susceptibility [ Time Frame: Baseline and time of virologic failure (up to Week 96) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Number of Participants Who Reported a Suspected Abacavir Hypersensitivity Reaction (ABC HSR) Reaction or Proximal Renal Tubule Dysfunction [ Time Frame: Baseline through 96 weeks ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
No publications provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Study Director, GSK |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00244712 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | EPZ104057, EPZ104057 |
| Study First Received: | October 25, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | April 23, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | June 3, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |