AG-013736 In Combination With Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Alone For Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00219557
First received: September 13, 2005
Last updated: July 23, 2012
Last verified: July 2012
Results First Received: February 25, 2012  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Open Label;   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Pancreatic Neoplasms
Interventions: Drug: Gemcitabine
Drug: AG-013736

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Axitinib + Gemcitabine (Phase 1 Lead-In) Axitinib (AG-013736) 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID) starting from Day 3 of Cycle 1, in cycles of 4 weeks. Gemcitabine 1000 milligram/square meter (mg/m^2) 30 minutes intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.
Axitinib + Gemcitabine Axitinib (AG-013736) 5 mg tablet orally BID starting from Day 1 of Cycle 1, in cycles of 4 weeks. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 30 minutes IV infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.
Gemcitabine Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 30 minutes IV infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.

Participant Flow for 2 periods

Period 1:   Phase 1
    Axitinib + Gemcitabine (Phase 1 Lead-In)     Axitinib + Gemcitabine     Gemcitabine  
STARTED     8     0     0  
COMPLETED     1     0     0  
NOT COMPLETED     7     0     0  
Lack of Efficacy                 3                 0                 0  
Adverse Event                 2                 0                 0  
Withdrawal by Subject                 1                 0                 0  
Started chemotherapy at other institute                 1                 0                 0  

Period 2:   Phase 2
    Axitinib + Gemcitabine (Phase 1 Lead-In)     Axitinib + Gemcitabine     Gemcitabine  
STARTED     0     69     34  
Treated     0     68     31  
COMPLETED     0     0     1  
NOT COMPLETED     0     69     33  
Lack of Efficacy                 0                 21                 15  
Adverse Event                 0                 22                 2  
Death                 0                 8                 2  
Unspecified                 0                 8                 6  
Withdrawal by Subject                 0                 9                 5  
Treatment not received                 0                 1                 3  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Axitinib + Gemcitabine (Phase 1 Lead-In) Axitinib (AG-013736) 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID) starting from Day 3 of Cycle 1, in cycles of 4 weeks. Gemcitabine 1000 milligram/square meter (mg/m^2) 30 minutes intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.
Axitinib + Gemcitabine Axitinib (AG-013736) 5 mg tablet orally BID starting from Day 1 of Cycle 1, in cycles of 4 weeks. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 30 minutes IV infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.
Gemcitabine Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 30 minutes IV infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    Axitinib + Gemcitabine (Phase 1 Lead-In)     Axitinib + Gemcitabine     Gemcitabine     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  8     69     34     111  
Age, Customized  
[units: Participants]
       
18 years to 44 years     0     2     4     6  
45 years to 64 years     5     31     20     56  
Greater than or equal to 65 years     3     36     10     49  
Gender  
[units: Participants]
       
Female     1     34     18     53  
Male     7     35     16     58  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Overall Survival (OS)   [ Time Frame: Baseline of Phase 2 to death or until at least 1 year after the randomization of the last participant ]

2.  Secondary:   Dose Confirmation of Axitinib (AG-013736) on Basis of Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)   [ Time Frame: Phase 1 baseline up to Week 4 ]

3.  Secondary:   Dose Confirmation of Gemcitabine on Basis of Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)   [ Time Frame: Phase 1 Baseline up to Week 4 ]

4.  Secondary:   Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Axitinib (AG-013736)   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 4.5, 9.5, and 12.5 hours (hr) post-dose on Day 15 of Phase 1 Cycle 1 ]

5.  Secondary:   Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC (0-24)] of Axitinib (AG-013736)   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 4.5, 9.5, and 12.5 hr post-dose on Day 15 of Pase 1 Cycle 1 ]

6.  Secondary:   Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Axitinib (AG-013736)   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 4.5, 9.5, and 12.5 hr post-dose on Day 15 of Phase 1 Cycle 1 ]

7.  Secondary:   Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Axitinib (AG-013736)   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 4.5, 9.5, and 12.5 hr post-dose on Day 15 of Phase 1 Cycle 1 ]

8.  Secondary:   Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Gemcitabine   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 12 hr after start of infusion on Day 15 of Phase 1 Cycle 1 ]

9.  Secondary:   Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of Gemcitabine   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 12 hr after start of infusion on Day 15 of Phase 1 Cycle 1 ]

10.  Secondary:   Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Gemcitabine   [ Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 12 hr after start of infusion on Day 15 of Phase 1 Cycle 1 ]

11.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 baseline to disease progression or discontinuation from study, assessed every 8 weeks up to 80 weeks ]

12.  Secondary:   Duration of Response (DR)   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 baseline to disease progression or discontinuation from study due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks up to 80 weeks ]

13.  Secondary:   Progression-free Survival (PFS)   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 baseline until the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks up to 80 weeks ]

14.  Secondary:   One Year Survival Probability   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 baseline to disease progression or death due to any cause or at least 1 year after the first dose for the last participant ]

15.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 baseline [Day (D)1 of Cycle (C)1], Day 1 of all subsequent cycles up to Cycle 14 and end of study (EoS). ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 15

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Measure Description EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 ‘Not at All’ to 4 ‘Very Much’); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 ‘Very Poor’ to 7 ‘Excellent’). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. Change from baseline=Cycle/Day score minus baseline score.
Time Frame Phase 2 baseline [Day (D)1 of Cycle (C)1], Day 1 of all subsequent cycles up to Cycle 14 and end of study (EoS).  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Phase 2 ITT population was the primary analysis population. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. n signifies the number of participants evaluable for the respective scale at the respective time point.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Axitinib + Gemcitabine Axitinib (AG-013736) 5 mg tablet orally BID starting from Day 3 of Cycle 1, in cycles of 4 weeks. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 30 minutes IV infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.
Gemcitabine Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 30 minutes IV infusion on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle, in cycles of 4 weeks.

Measured Values
    Axitinib + Gemcitabine     Gemcitabine  
Number of Participants Analyzed  
[units: participants]
  65     27  
Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study  
[units: units on a scale]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
   
Global QoL: Baseline(n=65,27)     55.60  ± 27.18     54.32  ± 21.10  
Physical Functioning: Baseline(n=65,27)     76.90  ± 24.73     82.22  ± 14.44  
Role Functioning: Baseline(n=65,26)     62.56  ± 33.21     60.26  ± 35.30  
Emotional Functioning: Baseline(n=65,27)     67.22  ± 26.17     66.98  ± 23.96  
Cognitive Functioning: Baseline(n=65,27)     82.82  ± 23.93     82.10  ± 19.57  
Social Functioning: Baseline(n=65,26)     67.44  ± 33.00     70.51  ± 29.56  
Fatigue: Baseline(n=65,27)     43.50  ± 29.78     42.80  ± 25.73  
Nausea and Vomiting: Baseline(n=65,27)     19.74  ± 28.24     13.58  ± 20.17  
Pain: Baseline(n=65,27)     40.00  ± 33.31     37.04  ± 31.80  
Dyspnea: Baseline(n=64,27)     12.50  ± 21.82     16.05  ± 26.75  
Insomnia: Baseline(n=65,27)     31.28  ± 31.66     39.51  ± 39.26  
Appetite loss: Baseline(n=65,27)     41.03  ± 40.30     33.33  ± 34.59  
Constipation: Baseline(n=65,27)     34.87  ± 37.93     38.27  ± 38.90  
Diarrhea: Baseline(n=65,27)     20.00  ± 27.51     16.05  ± 28.30  
Financial Difficulties: Baseline(n=64,27)     10.42  ± 19.59     28.40  ± 41.04  
Global QoL: Change at C2 D1(n=49,20 )     -5.10  ± 21.17     3.33  ± 16.97  
Physical Functioning: Change at C2 D1(n=51,21)     -5.07  ± 18.85     0.95  ± 16.23  
Role Functioning: Change at C2 D1(n=51,19))     0.33  ± 25.93     9.65  ± 29.56  
Emotional Functioning: Change at C2 D1(n=52,21)     3.21  ± 21.34     7.94  ± 17.77  
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C2 D1(n=52,21)     -3.53  ± 21.48     1.59  ± 18.93  
Social Functioning: Change at C2 D1(n=52,20)     -4.17  ± 29.50     -0.83  ± 28.85  
Fatigue: Change at C2 D1(n=51,21)     1.42  ± 21.74     -8.99  ± 26.67  
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C2 D1(n=51,21)     -5.88  ± 26.84     -1.59  ± 12.81  
Pain: Change at C2 D1(n=52,21)     -9.29  ± 27.89     -16.67  ± 31.62  
Dyspnea: Change at C2 D1(n=50,21)     9.33  ± 26.97     -3.17  ± 25.61  
Insomnia: Change at C2 D1(n=51,21)     -9.15  ± 28.35     -19.05  ± 34.27  
Appetite loss: Change at C2 D1(n=51,21)     -0.65  ± 35.58     -14.29  ± 35.86  
Constipation: Change at C2 D1(n=52,21)     -9.62  ± 32.56     -14.29  ± 29.00  
Diarrhea: Change at C2 D1(n=52,21)     -1.28  ± 29.49     0.00  ± 18.26  
Financial Difficulties: Change at C2 D1(n=50,21)     0.67  ± 19.62     -4.76  ± 19.11  
Global QoL: Change at C3 D1(n=40,15)     -9.17  ± 30.36     6.67  ± 15.17  
Physical Functioning: Change at C3 D1(n=42,15)     -8.13  ± 21.46     3.44  ± 18.73  
Role Functioning: Change at C3 D1(n=42,14)     -5.56  ± 27.71     13.10  ± 25.47  
Emotional Functioning: Change at C3 D1(n=41,15)     -1.69  ± 26.80     12.22  ± 19.89  
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C3 D1(n=41,15)     -4.88  ± 24.79     2.22  ± 16.51  
Social Functioning: Change at C3 D1(n=41,15)     -4.07  ± 32.66     5.56  ± 24.93  
Fatigue: Change at C3 D1(n=42,14)     7.41  ± 28.61     -8.73  ± 26.57  
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C3 D1(n=42,13)     -4.37  ± 29.00     -2.56  ± 16.45  
Pain: Change at C3 D1(n=42,15)     -6.75  ± 33.75     -23.33  ± 30.08  
Dyspnea: Change at C3 D1(n=41,14)     3.25  ± 27.69     -7.14  ± 19.30  
Insomnia: Change at C3 D1(n=42,14)     -10.32  ± 34.13     -11.90  ± 38.36  
Appetite loss: Change at C3 D1(n=42,13)     11.11  ± 39.42     -5.13  ± 29.96  
Constipation: Change at C3 D1(n=41,15)     -10.57  ± 32.86     -13.33  ± 35.19  
Diarrhea: Change at C3 D1(n=41,15)     7.32  ± 32.07     4.44  ± 30.52  
Financial Difficulties: Change at C3 D1(n=40,15)     3.33  ± 24.81     -2.22  ± 26.63  
Global QoL: Change at C3 D1(n=30,12)     -6.67  ± 21.04     -1.03  ± 15.27  
Physical Functioning: Change at C3 D1(n=32,13)     -6.67  ± 23.15     -1.03  ± 15.36  
Role Functioning: Change at C4 D1(n=32,12)     -7.81  ± 29.63     9.72  ± 36.56  
Emotional Functioning: Change at C4 D1(n=31,12)     -3.23  ± 22.64     9.03  ± 36.56  
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C4 D1(n=31,12)     -6.99  ± 25.74     0.00  ± 15.89  
Social Functioning: Change at C4 D1(n=31,11)     -8.60  ± 35.45     -1.52  ± 24.10  
Fatigue: Change at C4 D1(n=32,13)     7.47  ± 25.19     -3.42  ± 25.41  
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C4 D1(n=32,13)     -4.69  ± 19.96     6.41  ± 18.68  
Pain: Change at C4 D1(n=32,13)     -16.67  ± 29.02     -11.54  ± 28.37  
Dyspnea: Change at C4 D1(n=31,13)     0.00  ± 28.54     -5.13  ± 29.96  
Insomnia: Change at C4 D1(n=32,13)     -11.46  ± 28.85     -5.13  ± 32.90  
Appetite loss: Change at C4 D1(n=32,12)     6.25  ± 36.35     -2.78  ± 33.21  
Constipation: Change at C4 D1(n=30,12)     -24.44  ± 37.07     -25.00  ± 40.51  
Diarrhea: Change at C4 D1(n=31, 12)     7.53  ± 39.17     5.56  ± 34.33  
Financial Difficulties: Change at C4 D1(n=29,12)     1.15  ± 22.68     -8.33  ± 20.72  
Global QoL: Change at C5 D1(n=26,7)     -9.29  ± 27.82     10.71  ± 21.36  
Physical Functioning: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     -8.57  ± 23.08     0.00  ± 22.25  
Role Functioning: Change at C5 D1(n=28,7)     -8.93  ± 29.22     7.14  ± 28.64  
Emotional Functioning: Change at C5 D1(n=28,7)     -3.87  ± 22.96     20.24  ± 14.32  
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C5 D1(n=28,7)     -2.38  ± 24.73     7.14  ± 16.27  
Social Functioning: Change at C5 D1(n=28,7)     -15.48  ± 33.92     4.76  ± 23.00  
Fatigue: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     9.72  ± 28.59     -15.28  ± 17.76  
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     0.00  ± 26.06     -6.25  ± 15.27  
Pain: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     -5.36  ± 34.26     -25.00  ± 26.73  
Dyspnea: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     9.52  ± 27.00     -12.50  ± 24.80  
Insomnia: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     -19.05  ± 35.63     -29.17  ± 33.03  
Appetite loss: Change at C5 D1(n=28,8)     0.00  ± 42.55     -20.83  ± 43.42  
Constipation: Change at C5 D1(n=28,7)     -21.43  ± 35.39     -33.33  ± 38.49  
Diarrhea: Change at C5 D1(n=28,7)     7.14  ± 33.16     -4.76  ± 29.99  
Financial Difficulties: Change at C5 D1(n=27,6)     0.00  ± 22.65     0.00  ± 36.51  
Global QoL: Change at C6 D1(n=17,3)     -14.22  ± 20.36     -5.56  ± 12.73  
Physical Functioning: Change at C6 D1(n=19,2)     -6.32  ± 25.38     6.67  ± 18.86  
Role Functioning: Change at C6 D1(n=19,2)     -9.65  ± 27.95     16.67  ± 47.14  
Emotional Functioning: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     2.19  ± 15.92     8.33  ± 14.43  
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     -0.88  ± 18.82     11.11  ± 9.62  
Social Functioning: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     -2.63  ± 27.92     -16.67  ± 16.67  
Fatigue: Change at C6 D1(n=19,2)     6.73  ± 24.19     -16.67  ± 39.28  
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C6 D1(n=19,2)     -4.39  ± 22.80     -8.33  ± 11.79  
Pain: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     -8.77  ± 30.11     -33.33  ± 16.67  
Dyspnea: Change at C6 D1(n=18,2)     -1.85  ± 21.30     0.00  ± 47.14  
Insomnia: Change at C6 D1(n=19,2)     -7.02  ± 30.59     -16.67  ± 23.57  
Appetite loss: Change at C6 D1(n=19,2)     -3.51  ± 53.16     -16.67  ± 70.71  
Constipation: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     -10.53  ± 35.23     -33.33  ± 33.33  
Diarrhea: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     -1.75  ± 28.27     0.00  ± 33.33  
Financial Difficulties: Change at C6 D1(n=19,3)     1.75  ± 13.49     -22.22  ± 38.49  
Global QoL: Change at C7 D1(n=9,3)     -4.63  ± 37.76     -16.67  ± 14.43  
Role Functioning: Change at C7 D1(n=10,2)     -3.33  ± 24.80     -22.22  ± 36.72  
Role Functioning: Change at C7 D1(n=10,2)     -15.00  ± 30.88     33.33  ± 70.71  
Emotional Functioning: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -8.33  ± 13.03     -7.41  ± 21.58  
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     1.67  ± 24.15     -5.56  ± 9.62  
Social Functioning: Change at C7 D1(n=10,2)     -15.00  ± 41.16     -25.00  ± 11.79  
Fatigue: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -2.22  ± 25.01     14.81  ± 42.07  
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C7D1(n=10,3)     1.67  ± 21.44     16.67  ± 0.00  
Pain: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -3.33  ± 32.20     -11.11  ± 41.94  
Dyspnea: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     16.67  ± 23.57     33.33  ± 33.33  
Insomnia: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -10.00  ± 35.31     11.11  ± 38.49  
Appetite loss: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -10.00  ± 58.90     22.22  ± 50.92  
Constipation: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -13.33  ± 47.66     -66.67  ± 57.74  
Diarrhea: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     3.33  ± 29.19     0.00  ± 0.00  
Financial Difficulties: Change at C7 D1(n=10,3)     -6.67  ± 21.08     0.00  ± 0.00  
Global QoL: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -12.50  ± 33.62     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Physical Functioning Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -10.67  ± 22.71     -20.00  ± NA [1]
Role Functioning: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -13.33  ± 23.31     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -7.50  ± 18.61     0.00  ± NA [1]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     0.00  ± 22.22     -16.67  ± NA [1]
Social Functioning: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -11.67  ± 34.29     -16.67  ± NA [1]
Fatigue: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     4.44  ± 25.23     2.22  ± NA [1]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     0.00  ± 19.25     16.67  ± NA [1]
Pain: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -8.33  ± 37.06     -16.67  ± NA [1]
Dyspnea: Change at C8 D1(n=9,1)     14.81  ± 29.40     33.33  ± NA [1]
Insomnia: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -20.00  ± 47.66     0.00  ± NA [1]
Appetite loss: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -3.33  ± 48.30     33.33  ± NA [1]
Constipation: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -3.33  ± 29.19     0.00  ± NA [1]
Diarrhea: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     6.67  ± 37.84     -66.67  ± NA [1]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C8 D1(n=10,1)     -3.33  ± 18.92     0.00  ± NA [1]
Global QoL: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -17.71  ± 36.03     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Physical Functioning: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -6.67  ± 20.16     -40.00  ± NA [1]
Role Functioning: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -29.17  ± 24.80     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -3.13  ± 13.32     -8.33  ± NA [1]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -2.08  ± 28.78     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Social Functioning: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -6.25  ± 47.09     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Fatigue: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     18.06  ± 33.56     33.33  ± NA [1]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -8.33  ± 17.82     16.67  ± NA [1]
Pain: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1 )     0.00  ± 30.86     0.00  ± NA [1]
Dyspnea: Change at C9 D1(n=7,1)     19.05  ± 26.23     33.33  ± NA [1]
Insomnia: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -4.17  ± 33.03     0.00  ± NA [1]
Appetite loss: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     8.33  ± 63.62     33.33  ± NA [1]
Constipation: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -8.33  ± 38.83     0.00  ± NA [1]
Diarrhea: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     12.50  ± 43.42     -66.67  ± NA [1]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C9 D1(n=8,1)     -4.17  ± 21.36     0.00  ± NA [1]
Global QoL: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -16.67  ± 21.52     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Physical Functioning: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -19.05  ± 13.01     -46.67  ± NA [1]
Role Functioning: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -23.81  ± 21.21     -50.00  ± NA [1]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -20.24  ± 23.00     -16.67  ± NA [1]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -9.52  ± 21.21     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Social Functioning: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -21.43  ± 31.50     -50.00  ± NA [1]
Fatigue: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     25.40  ± 24.61     55.56  ± NA [1]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     0.00  ± 25.46     16.67  ± NA [1]
Pain: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     11.90  ± 35.63     16.67  ± NA [1]
Dyspnea: Change at C10 D1(n=6,1)     22.22  ± 27.22     33.33  ± NA [1]
Insomnia: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     4.76  ± 23.00     0.00  ± NA [1]
Appetite loss: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     23.81  ± 46.00     33.33  ± NA [1]
Constipation: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -19.05  ± 37.80     0.00  ± NA [1]
Diarrhea: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     9.52  ± 31.71     -66.67  ± NA [1]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C10 D1(n=7,1)     -4.76  ± 23.00     0.00  ± NA [1]
Global QoL: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -38.89  ± 53.58     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Physical Functioning: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -24.44  ± 36.72     -40.00  ± NA [1]
Role Functioning: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -38.89  ± 53.58     -66.67  ± NA [1]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -25.00  ± 52.04     -8.33  ± NA [1]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -27.78  ± 63.10     -33.33  ± NA [1]
Social Functioning: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -38.89  ± 53.58     -66.67  ± NA [1]
Fatigue: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     37.04  ± 46.26     22.22  ± NA [1]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     27.78  ± 63.10     16.67  ± NA [1]
Pain: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     22.22  ± 69.39     -16.67  ± NA [1]
Dyspnea: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     22.22  ± 69.39     33.33  ± NA [1]
Insomnia: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     22.22  ± 69.39     0.00  ± NA [1]
Appetite loss: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     44.44  ± 50.92     0.00  ± NA [1]
Constipation: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     0.00  ± 33.33     0.00  ± NA [1]
Diarrhea: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     11.11  ± 19.25     -66.67  ± NA [1]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C11 D1(n=3,1)     -11.11  ± 19.25     0.00  ± NA [1]
Global QoL: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -11.11  ± 17.35     NA  ± NA [2]
Physical Functioning: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -6.67  ± 6.67     NA  ± NA [2]
Role Functioning: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -11.11  ± 19.25     NA  ± NA [2]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -2.78  ± 20.97     NA  ± NA [2]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     0.00  ± 16.67     NA  ± NA [2]
Social Functioning: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -5.56  ± 9.62     NA  ± NA [2]
Fatigue: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     7.41  ± 12.83     NA  ± NA [2]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     16.67  ± 60.09     NA  ± NA [2]
Pain: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -5.56  ± 9.62     NA  ± NA [2]
Dyspnea: Change at C12 D1(n=2,0)     0.00  ± 0.00     NA  ± NA [2]
Insomnia: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -11.11  ± 19.25     NA  ± NA [2]
Appetite loss: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     22.22  ± 19.25     NA  ± NA [2]
Constipation: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -22.22  ± 38.49     NA  ± NA [2]
Diarrhea: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     22.22  ± 19.25     NA  ± NA [2]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C12 D1(n=3,0)     -11.11  ± 19.25     NA  ± NA [2]
Global QoL: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -50.00  ± 35.36     NA  ± NA [2]
Physical Functioning: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -23.33  ± 33.00     NA  ± NA [2]
Role Functioning: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -41.67  ± 35.36     NA  ± NA [2]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -8.33  ± 11.79     NA  ± NA [2]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     0.00  ± 0.00     NA  ± NA [2]
Social Functioning: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -8.33  ± 35.36     NA  ± NA [2]
Fatigue: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     33.33  ± 47.14     NA  ± NA [2]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -8.33  ± 35.36     NA  ± NA [2]
Pain: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     41.67  ± 58.93     NA  ± NA [2]
Dyspnea: Change at C13 D1(n=1,0)     0.00  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Insomnia: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     0.00  ± 0.00     NA  ± NA [2]
Appetite loss: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     33.33  ± 47.14     NA  ± NA [2]
Constipation: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -16.67  ± 23.57     NA  ± NA [2]
Diarrhea: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     16.67  ± 23.57     NA  ± NA [2]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C13 D1(n=2,0)     -16.67  ± 23.57     NA  ± NA [2]
Global QoL: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     -16.67  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Physical Functioning: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     -6.67  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Role Functioning: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     -33.33  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Emotional Functioning: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     -8.33  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     16.67  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Social Functioning: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     0.00  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Fatigue: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     22.22  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     0.00  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Pain: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     16.67  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Dyspnea: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     33.33  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Insomnia: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     -33.33  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Appetite loss: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     0.00  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Constipation: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     0.00  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Diarrhea: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     33.33  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Financial Difficulties: Change at C14 D1(n=1,0)     -33.33  ± NA [1]   NA  ± NA [2]
Global QoL: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -54.17  ± 29.46     0.00  ± NA [1]
Physical Functioning: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -70.00  ± 4.71     0.00  ± NA [1]
Role Functioning: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -33.33  ± 23.57     0.00  ± NA [1]
Emotional Functioning: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -66.67  ± 35.36     -25.00  ± NA [1]
Cognitive Functioning: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -66.67  ± 0.00     0.00  ± NA [1]
Social Functioning: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -83.33  ± 23.57     0.00  ± NA [1]
Fatigue: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     55.56  ± 15.71     -11.11  ± NA [1]
Nausea and Vomiting: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     33.33  ± 23.57     0.00  ± NA [1]
Pain: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     41.67  ± 82.50     16.67  ± NA [1]
Dyspnea: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     83.33  ± 23.57     0.00  ± NA [1]
Insomnia: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     66.67  ± 47.14     33.33  ± NA [1]
Appetite loss: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     50.00  ± 70.71     0.00  ± NA [1]
Constipation: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -16.67  ± 117.85     0.00  ± NA [1]
Diarrhea: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     33.33  ± 47.14     0.00  ± NA [1]
Financial Difficulties: Change at EoS(n=2,1)     -16.67  ± 23.57     0.00  ± NA [1]
[1] Standard deviation was not calculated because only one participant was evaluable.
[2] Mean was not calculated because no participant was evaluable.


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -8.44
95% Confidence Interval ( -19.06 to 2.19 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -6.02
95% Confidence Interval ( -15.4 to 3.36 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -9.32
95% Confidence Interval ( -23.77 to 5.12 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 4 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -4.73
95% Confidence Interval ( -15.25 to 5.79 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 5 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -5.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -15.83 to 5.61 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 6 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -3.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -18.72 to 12.06 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 7 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 10.41
95% Confidence Interval ( -1.62 to 22.44 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 8 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -4.30
95% Confidence Interval ( -16.55 to 7.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 9 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 7.37
95% Confidence Interval ( -7.57 to 22.32 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 10 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 12.51
95% Confidence Interval ( -1.28 to 26.30 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 11 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 9.90
95% Confidence Interval ( -5.70 to 25.49 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 12 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 13.63
95% Confidence Interval ( -4.81 to 32.07 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 13 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 4.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -11.62 to 20.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 14 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -1.28
95% Confidence Interval ( -15.1 to 12.54 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 15 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 5.43
95% Confidence Interval ( -4.67 to 15.53 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 2 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 16 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -15.83
95% Confidence Interval ( -32.34 to 0.67 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 17 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -11.58
95% Confidence Interval ( -24.12 to 0.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 18 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -18.65
95% Confidence Interval ( -35.47 to -1.83 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 19 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -13.92
95% Confidence Interval ( -29.16 to 1.32 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 20 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -7.10
95% Confidence Interval ( -20.97 to 6.77 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 21 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -9.62
95% Confidence Interval ( -28.28 to 9.04 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 22 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 16.14
95% Confidence Interval ( -1.27 to 33.54 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 23 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -1.80
95% Confidence Interval ( -18.78 to 15.18 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 24 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 16.59
95% Confidence Interval ( -3.22 to 36.39 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 25 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 10.39
95% Confidence Interval ( -5.68 to 26.47 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 26 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 1.59
95% Confidence Interval ( -20.19 to 23.36 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 27 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 16.24
95% Confidence Interval ( -7.62 to 40.1 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 28 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 2.76
95% Confidence Interval ( -17.49 to 23.02 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 29 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 2.87
95% Confidence Interval ( -16.29 to 22.03 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 30 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 5.56
95% Confidence Interval ( -9.81 to 20.92 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 3 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 31 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -5.97
95% Confidence Interval ( -19.52 to 7.57 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 32 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -5.64
95% Confidence Interval ( -19.75 to 8.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 33 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -17.53
95% Confidence Interval ( -39.11 to 4.05 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 34 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -12.25
95% Confidence Interval ( -26.5 to 2.00 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 35 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -6.99
95% Confidence Interval ( -23.13 to 9.15 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 36 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -7.09
95% Confidence Interval ( -30.48 to 16.31 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 37 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 10.88
95% Confidence Interval ( -5.86 to 27.63 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 38 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -11.10
95% Confidence Interval ( -24.11 to 1.91 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 39 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -5.13
95% Confidence Interval ( -24.26 to 14.00 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 40 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 5.13
95% Confidence Interval ( -14.18 to 24.44 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 41 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -6.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -26.25 to 13.59 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 42 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 9.03
95% Confidence Interval ( -15.26 to 33.32 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 43 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 0.56
95% Confidence Interval ( -25.71 to 26.82 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 44 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 1.97
95% Confidence Interval ( -24.07 to 28.01 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 45 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 9.48
95% Confidence Interval ( -5.89 to 24.86 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 4 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 46 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -20.01
95% Confidence Interval ( -43.19 to 3.17 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 47 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -8.57
95% Confidence Interval ( -27.24 to 10.10 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 48 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.07
95% Confidence Interval ( -41.10 to 8.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 49 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -24.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -42.72 to -5.50 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 50 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -9.52
95% Confidence Interval ( -29.66 to 10.61 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 51 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -20.24
95% Confidence Interval ( -47.93 to 7.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 52 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 25.00
95% Confidence Interval ( 3.23 to 46.77 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 53 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 6.25
95% Confidence Interval ( -13.49 to 25.99 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 54 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 19.64
95% Confidence Interval ( -7.12 to 46.41 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 55 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 22.02
95% Confidence Interval ( 0.38 to 43.66 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 56 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 10.12
95% Confidence Interval ( -18.49 to 38.73 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 57 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 20.83
95% Confidence Interval ( -13.98 to 55.65 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 58 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 11.90
95% Confidence Interval ( -19.02 to 42.83 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 59 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 11.90
95% Confidence Interval ( -16.13 to 39.94 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 60 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 0.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -23.38 to 23.38 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 5 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 61 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -8.66
95% Confidence Interval ( -34.53 to 17.21 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 62 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -12.98
95% Confidence Interval ( -52.01 to 26.04 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 63 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -26.32
95% Confidence Interval ( -71.87 to 19.24 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 64 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -6.14
95% Confidence Interval ( -26.59 to 14.31 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 65 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -11.99
95% Confidence Interval ( -35.46 to 11.48 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 66 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 14.04
95% Confidence Interval ( -20.97 to 49.04 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 67 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 23.39
95% Confidence Interval ( -15.83 to 62.61 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 68 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 3.95
95% Confidence Interval ( -30.84 to 38.73 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 69 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 24.56
95% Confidence Interval ( -13.08 to 62.20 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 70 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -1.85
95% Confidence Interval ( -38.65 to 34.94 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 71 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 9.65
95% Confidence Interval ( -37.43 to 56.73 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 72 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 13.16
95% Confidence Interval ( -71.22 to 97.54 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 73 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 22.81
95% Confidence Interval ( -22.61 to 68.22 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 74 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -1.75
95% Confidence Interval ( -39.10 to 35.59 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 75 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 23.98
95% Confidence Interval ( 1.09 to 46.86 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 6 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 76 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 12.04
95% Confidence Interval ( -39.03 to 63.11 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 77 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 18.89
95% Confidence Interval ( -20.74 to 58.52 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 78 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -48.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -111.94 to 15.28 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 79 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -0.93
95% Confidence Interval ( -22.59 to 20.74 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 80 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 7.22
95% Confidence Interval ( -24.98 to 39.43 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 81 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 10.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -57.71 to 77.71 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 82 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -17.04
95% Confidence Interval ( -58.87 to 24.79 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 83 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -15.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -43.10 to 13.10 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 84 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 7.78
95% Confidence Interval ( -41.75 to 57.30 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 85 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -53.79 to 20.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 86 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -21.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -73.14 to 30.92 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 87 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -32.22
95% Confidence Interval ( -115.58 to 51.13 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 88 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 53.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -18.60 to 125.26 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 89 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 3.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -34.92 to 41.58 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 90 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -6.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -34.3 to 20.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 7 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 91 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 20.83
95% Confidence Interval ( -58.94 to 100.60 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 92 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 9.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -44.54 to 63.20 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 93 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 20.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -35.30 to 75.30 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 94 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -7.50
95% Confidence Interval ( -51.66 to 36.66 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 95 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -36.06 to 69.39 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 96 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 5.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -76.36 to 86.36 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 97 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -17.78
95% Confidence Interval ( -77.63 to 42.08 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 98 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -62.33 to 28.99 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 99 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 8.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -79.59 to 96.26 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 100 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -18.52
95% Confidence Interval ( -89.98 to 52.94 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 101 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -20.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -133.08 to 93.08 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 102 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -36.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -151.27 to 77.94 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 103 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -3.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -72.58 to 65.91 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 104 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 73.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -16.45 to 163.12 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 105 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -3.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -48.23 to 41.56 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 8 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 106 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 15.62
95% Confidence Interval ( -74.75 to 106.00 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 107 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 33.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -17.22 to 83.89 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 108 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 4.17
95% Confidence Interval ( -58.04 to 66.37 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 109 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 5.21
95% Confidence Interval ( -28.19 to 38.61 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 110 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 31.25
95% Confidence Interval ( -40.94 to 103.44 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 111 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 27.08
95% Confidence Interval ( -91.02 to 145.18 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 112 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -15.28
95% Confidence Interval ( -99.46 to 68.90 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 113 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -25.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -69.69 to 19.69 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 114 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 0.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -77.40 to 77.40 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 115 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -14.29
95% Confidence Interval ( -82.89 to 54.32 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 116 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -4.17
95% Confidence Interval ( -87.02 to 78.69 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 117 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -25.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -184.57 to 134.57 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 118 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -8.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -105.73 to 89.06 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 119 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 79.17
95% Confidence Interval ( -29.72 to 188.06 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 120 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -4.17
95% Confidence Interval ( -57.74 to 49.41 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 9 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 121 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -39.62 to 72.95 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 122 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 27.62
95% Confidence Interval ( -6.42 to 61.66 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 123 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 26.19
95% Confidence Interval ( -29.28 to 81.66 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 124 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -3.57
95% Confidence Interval ( -63.74 to 56.6 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 125 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 23.81
95% Confidence Interval ( -31.66 to 79.28 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 126 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 28.57
95% Confidence Interval ( -53.82 to 110.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 127 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -30.16
95% Confidence Interval ( -94.53 to 34.21 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 128 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -83.26 to 49.93 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 129 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -4.76
95% Confidence Interval ( -97.98 to 88.45 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 130 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -11.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -86.68 to 64.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 131 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 4.76
95% Confidence Interval ( -55.41 to 64.93 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 132 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -9.52
95% Confidence Interval ( -129.86 to 110.82 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 133 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -19.05
95% Confidence Interval ( -117.92 to 79.82 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 134 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 76.19
95% Confidence Interval ( -6.75 to 159.13 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 135 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -4.76
95% Confidence Interval ( -64.93 to 55.41 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 10 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 136 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -5.56
95% Confidence Interval ( -271.74 to 260.62 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 137 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 15.56
95% Confidence Interval ( -166.87 to 197.98 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 138 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 27.78
95% Confidence Interval ( -238.4 to 293.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 139 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -275.22 to 241.89 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 140 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 5.56
95% Confidence Interval ( -307.94 to 319.05 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 141 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 27.78
95% Confidence Interval ( -238.40 to 293.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 142 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 14.81
95% Confidence Interval ( -215.01 to 244.64 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 143 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 11.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -302.38 to 324.60 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 144 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 38.89
95% Confidence Interval ( -305.85 to 383.63 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 145 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -11.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -355.85 to 333.63 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 146 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 22.22
95% Confidence Interval ( -322.52 to 366.97 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 147 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 44.44
95% Confidence Interval ( -208.53 to 297.42 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 148 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 0.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -165.61 to 165.61 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 149 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 77.78
95% Confidence Interval ( -17.84 to 173.39 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 150 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -11.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -106.73 to 84.5 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at Cycle 11 Day 1, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 151 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -54.17
95% Confidence Interval ( -512.66 to 404.33 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in global QoL at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 152 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -70.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -143.36 to 3.36 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in physical functioning at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 153 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -33.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -400.13 to 333.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in role functioning at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 154 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -41.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -591.86 to 508.53 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in emotional functioning at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 155 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -66.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -66.67 to -66.67 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in cognitive functioning at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 156 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -83.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -450.13 to 283.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in social functioning at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 157 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 66.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -177.86 to 311.2 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in fatigue at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 158 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 33.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -333.46 to 400.13 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in nausea and vomiting at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 159 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 25.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -1258.79 to 1308.79 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in pain at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 160 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 83.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -283.46 to 450.13 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in dyspnea at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 161 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 33.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -700.26 to 766.93 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in insomnia at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 162 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 50.00
95% Confidence Interval ( -1050.39 to 1150.39 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in appetite loss at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 163 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -1850.65 to 1817.32 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in constipation at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 164 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] 33.33
95% Confidence Interval ( -700.26 to 766.93 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in diarrhea at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 165 for Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study
Groups [1] All groups
Mean Difference (Final Values) [2] -16.67
95% Confidence Interval ( -383.46 to 350.13 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  For change in financial difficulties at EoS, mean change difference was used to compare the two treatment groups.
[2] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



16.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in 26-item Pancreatic Cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-PAN26) Score at Day 1 of Every Cycle and End of Study   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 baseline [Day (D) 1 of Cycle (C)1], Day 1 of all subsequent cycles up to Cycle 14 and end of study (EoS). ]

17.  Secondary:   Population Pharmacokinetics of Axitinib (AG-013736) in Phase 2   [ Time Frame: Phase 2 Day 1 (Pre-dose), Day 29, Day 57 and then every 8 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation from study or up to 80 weeks ]
Results not yet posted.   Anticipated Posting Date:   No text entered.   Safety Issue:   No


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information