An Italian Study of the Efficacy of Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Comorbid Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD).
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Eli Lilly and Company
Information provided by:
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00192023
First received: September 12, 2005
Last updated: December 9, 2009
Last verified: December 2009
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: May 15, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Oppositional Defiant Disorder |
| Interventions: |
Drug: atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day Drug: placebo Drug: atomoxetine 1.2 mg/kg/day Drug: atomoxetine 1.2-1.4 mg/kg/day |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Study Period I=Screening. Study Period II=Standardized behavioral management program for parents (156 entered, 17 discontinued). Study Period III=Double-Blind (randomization). Two patients did not have post-baseline values for the primary endpoint and were not included in Baseline or efficacy analyses. Study Period IV=Optional open-label phase. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: Period III - Double-Blind
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 107 | 32 |
| COMPLETED | 100 [1] | 32 [2] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 7 | 0 |
| Adverse Event | 3 | 0 |
| Physician Decision | 2 | 0 |
| Parent/Caregiver Decision | 2 | 0 |
| [1] | 6 patients who completed the protocol did not enter optional open-label period. |
|---|---|
| [2] | 2 patients who completed the protocol did not enter the optional open-label period. |
Period 2: Period IV - Optional Open-Label
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 124 | 0 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 49 | 0 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 75 | 0 |
| Adverse Event | 6 | 0 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 7 | 0 |
| Patient/Caregiver Decision | 46 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 |
| Physician Decision | 9 | 0 |
| [1] | Placebo patients received atomoxetine during the optional open-label period. |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
105 | 32 | 137 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
9.7 ± 2.2 | 10.0 ± 2.4 | 9.8 ± 2.3 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| Male | 98 | 29 | 127 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| Italy | 105 | 32 | 137 |
|
Race/Ethnicity
[units: participants] |
|||
| Caucasian | 104 | 29 | 133 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 | 4 |
|
Height
[units: centimeters] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
140.1 ± 15.2 | 141.6 ± 15.3 | 140.4 ± 15.1 |
|
Weight
[units: kilograms] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
39.3 ± 15.8 | 41.4 ± 14.1 | 39.8 ± 15.4 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV): Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subscale [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV): Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subscale |
| Measure Description | Items from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD are included for the two subsets of symptoms: inattention (items #1-#9) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (items #11-#19). The SNAP-IV is based on a 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) rating scale. Total subscale scores range from 0 to 54. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e, 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
105 | 32 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV): Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subscale
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 42.7 ± 6.2 | 41.5 ± 6.9 |
| Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -8.1 ± 9.2 | -2.0 ± 4.7 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV): Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subscale
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Using an estimate of the common standard deviation of 13 points, the planned sample size will give about 80% power to detect a difference between the groups of 8 points on the SNAP-IV. The sample size was determined using a two-sided test with p=0.05, and assumes that up to 10% of patients will discontinue the study without providing post-baseline efficacy data in Study Period III. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Change to Week 8 Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to Week 8=score at Week 8+treatment+site+treatment-by-site interaction. If treatment-by-site interaction isn't significant it will be removed from model. |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) - Severity [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) - Severity |
| Measure Description | Measures severity of illness at the time of assessment. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e, 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
105 | 32 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) - Severity
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 5.1 ± 0.9 |
| Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -0.6 ± 0.7 | 0.0 ± 0.5 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) - Severity
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 3. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in SNAP-IV Oppositional Subscale [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in SNAP-IV Oppositional Subscale |
| Measure Description | Items are included from the DSM-IV criteria for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (items #21-#28). The SNAP-IV is based on a 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) rating scale. Total subscale scores range from 0 to 24. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e, 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
105 | 32 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in SNAP-IV Oppositional Subscale
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 17.2 ± 3.0 | 17.5 ± 3.8 |
| Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -2.7 ± 4.1 | -0.3 ± 2.6 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in SNAP-IV Oppositional Subscale
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 4. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) Total Score [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) Total Score |
| Measure Description | The scale measures symptoms of DSM-IV linked anxiety disorders in children. Contains 41 items. Individual item scores range from 0 (not true or hardly ever true) to 2 (very true or often true). Therefore, the overall score ranges from 0 to 82. Higher scores are more indicative of greater anxiety. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e., 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. Missing data were not imputed, which generates different analysis population sizes for the different endpoints. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
103 | 32 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) Total Score
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 20.3 ± 11.8 | 18.8 ± 11.5 |
| Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -2.1 ± 7.6 | -1.7 ± 6.5 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) Total Score
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.836 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised |
| Measure Description | Measures presence and severity of depression. Consists of 17 items scored on a 1-5 or 1-7 scale. A rating of 1 indicates normal, thus the minimum score is 17. The maximum score is 113. In general, scores below 20 indicate an absence of depression; scores of 20 or 30 indicate borderline depression; scores of 40 to 60 indicate moderate depression. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e, 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
105 | 32 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 28.0 ± 8.4 | 26.9 ± 8.1 |
| Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -0.5 ± 4.4 | -0.1 ± 5.0 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.870 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores |
| Measure Description | A 27-item rating scale (0 [not at all/never] to 3 [very much true/very often]) completed by the parent to assess problem behaviors related to ADHD. Subscales: Oppositional, Cognitive Problems, Hyperactivity, and ADHD Index. Subscale total scores range from 0 to 18 for all subscales except ADHD Index which ranges from 0 to 36. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e., 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. Missing data were not imputed, which generates different analysis population sizes for the different endpoints. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
103 | 32 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Oppositional Baseline | 11.7 ± 3.8 | 12.2 ± 3.9 |
| Oppositional Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -1.2 ± 3.9 | 0.8 ± 2.7 |
| Cognitive Problems Baseline | 14.3 ± 3.1 | 14.2 ± 3.2 |
| Cognitive Problems Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -2.3 ± 3.8 | 0.2 ± 2.6 |
| Hyperactivity Baseline | 12.0 ± 3.8 | 12.0 ± 4.0 |
| Hyperactivity Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -2.2 ± 4.1 | -0.7 ± 2.6 |
| ADHD Index Baseline | 28.2 ± 4.9 | 28.4 ± 5.2 |
| ADHD Index Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -5.0 ± 6.7 | -0.1 ± 3.9 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.002 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Oppositional Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Cognitive Problems Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.022 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Hyperactivity Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
Statistical Analysis 4 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for ADHD Index Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 7. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Child Health and Illness Profile - Child Edition (CHIP-CE): Parent Rated Form [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Child Health and Illness Profile - Child Edition (CHIP-CE): Parent Rated Form |
| Measure Description | Parent-rated assessment of a child’s health status and level of functioning. It consists of 76 items. The majority of items assess frequency of activities or feelings using a five-point response format (for example, ‘how good is your child at making friends?’ 1=never, 5=always). Standard scores (t-value) were established, with all domains and subdomains having a mean score of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Standard scores are expressed in standard deviation units. T-score=[(score-4.2382)*10/0.32835] + 50. Higher scores mean improvement. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e., 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. Missing data were not imputed, which generates different analysis population sizes for the different endpoints. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
97 | 29 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Child Health and Illness Profile - Child Edition (CHIP-CE): Parent Rated Form
[units: standard deviation units] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 27.1 ± 10.4 | 26.9 ± 11.2 |
| Change to 8 Week Endpoint | 3.6 ± 8.0 | 1.2 ± 6.6 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Child Health and Illness Profile - Child Edition (CHIP-CE): Parent Rated Form
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.071 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 8. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores [ Time Frame: Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores |
| Measure Description | A 28-item rating scale (0 [not at all/never] to 3 [very much true/very often]) completed by the teacher to assess problem behaviors related to ADHD. Subscale total scores range from 0 to 15 for Oppositional and Cognitive Problems, 0 to 21 for Hyperactivity, and 0 to 36 for ADHD Index. |
| Time Frame | Visit 8 (baseline) and Visit 14 (8 weeks) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy Population (All 139 randomized patients with at least a post-baseline value for the primary endpoint, i.e., 105 + 32 = 137 patients in total). Last Observation Carried Forward was applied. Missing data were not imputed, which generates different analysis population sizes for the different endpoints. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Placebo | placebo, daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 8 weeks, then possibility to switch to atomoxetine at 0.5 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 1 week, then to 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
58 | 18 |
|
Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Oppositional Baseline | 7.6 ± 4.3 | 10.8 ± 3.8 |
| Oppositional Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -1.1 ± 2.9 | 0.1 ± 2.2 |
| Cognitive Problems Baseline | 8.2 ± 4.3 | 8.5 ± 3.7 |
| Cognitive Problems Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -0.9 ± 2.5 | 0.0 ± 1.7 |
| Hyperactivity Baseline | 12.8 ± 5.5 | 16.3 ± 3.4 |
| Hyperactivity Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -2.1 ± 4.7 | -1.1 ± 3.0 |
| ADHD Index Baseline | 25.3 ± 8.4 | 29.4 ± 6.0 |
| ADHD Index Change to 8 Week Endpoint | -3.5 ± 7.1 | -0.9 ± 3.3 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.002 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Oppositional Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.113 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Cognitive Problems Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.051 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Hyperactivity Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
Statistical Analysis 4 for Change From Baseline to 8 Week Endpoint in Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form Subscale Scores
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.061 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for ADHD Index Change to 8 Week Endpoint. Change = Endpoint minus baseline. Model: Change to 8 Week Endpoint=Score at 8 weeks+treatment+site. |
| 9. Other Pre-specified: | Open-Label Phase Serious Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 14) though 1.5 years (Visit 20) or until atomoxetine received marketing approval ] |
| Measure Type | Other Pre-specified |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Open-Label Phase Serious Adverse Events |
| Measure Description | Number of participants with serious adverse events during the open-label phase of the trial, which was for 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Time Frame | Baseline (Visit 14) though 1.5 years (Visit 20) or until atomoxetine received marketing approval |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Number of patients who entered this optional open-label phase. All of the patients were dispensed drug. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
124 |
|
Open-Label Phase Serious Adverse Events
[units: participants] |
|
| Vomiting | 1 |
| Infectious mononucleosis | 1 |
| Agitation | 1 |
No statistical analysis provided for Open-Label Phase Serious Adverse Events
| 10. Other Pre-specified: | Open-Label Phase Nonserious Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 14) though 1.5 years (Visit 20) or until atomoxetine received marketing approval ] |
| Measure Type | Other Pre-specified |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Open-Label Phase Nonserious Adverse Events |
| Measure Description | Number of participants with nonserious adverse events during the open-label phase of the trial, which was for 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
| Time Frame | Baseline (Visit 14) though 1.5 years (Visit 20) or until atomoxetine received marketing approval |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Number of patients who entered this optional open-label phase. All of the patients were dispensed drug. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Atomoxetine | atomoxetine 0.5 mg/kg/day daily (QD), by mouth (PO) for 1 week, 1.2 mg/kg/day QD, PO for 7 weeks, then 1.2 - 1.4 mg/kg/day QD, PO for up to 1.5 years or until atomoxetine received marketing approval. |
Measured Values
| Atomoxetine | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
124 |
|
Open-Label Phase Nonserious Adverse Events
[units: participants] |
|
| Abdominal pain | 6 |
| Nausea | 10 |
| Vomiting | 11 |
| Pyrexia | 6 |
| Influenza | 7 |
| Weight decreased | 5 |
| Anorexia | 10 |
| Decreased appetite | 7 |
| Headache | 19 |
| Somnolence | 8 |
| Agitation | 7 |
| Insomnia | 4 |
No statistical analysis provided for Open-Label Phase Nonserious Adverse Events
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Due to the open-ended timing of the open-label period (up to 1.5 years or until commercial availability) the efficacy data from the open-label extension phase is not included except for adverse event data. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Chief Medical Officer
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 800-545-5979
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 800-545-5979
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Chielf Medical Officer, Eli Lilly |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00192023 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 8856, B4Z-IT-LYCY |
| Study First Received: | September 12, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | May 15, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | December 9, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ministry of Health |