A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Lyophilized Certolizumab Pegol in the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis and in Prevention of Joint Damage in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Endpoint Classification: Safety Study; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Rheumatoid Arthritis |
| Intervention: |
Biological: Certolizumab Pegol |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
|
Enrollment of subjects started in June 2005. 121 centers in 22 countries enrolled subjects. Participant Flow refers to the Safety Set consisting of all enrolled subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Of the 857 enrolled subjects, 846 subjects are included in the Safety Set. There was 1 enrolled subject who was never dosed. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
|
The study consists of 2 populations: of subjects who failed to achieve predefined criteria in preceding study NCT00152386 who entered C87028 on Week 16 of preceding study and of those who completed Week 52 of preceding study. Due to findings of fraud at one site, data of the 10 subjects of the site were not analyzed with data from other sites. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Certolizumab Pegol |
All patients received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneously (sc) every two weeks, given as two 1 ml injections of CZP for at least six months and then 200 mg of CZP sc every two weeks, given as one 1 ml injection. Certolizumab Pegol : Strength and Form: Lyophilized product reconstituted to 1 ml containing 200 mg of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) given as a subcutaneous injection. Dosage and Frequency: 400 mg every two weeks for at least 6 months, then 200 mg every two weeks. Duration: Until end of study. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Certolizumab Pegol | |
|---|---|
| STARTED | 846 |
| COMPLETED | 497 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 349 |
| Adverse Event | 136 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 141 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 9 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 26 |
| Protocol Violation | 15 |
| Other Reason | 20 |
| AE & Other | 1 |
| Withdrawal by subject & Other | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Certolizumab Pegol |
All patients received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneously (sc) every two weeks, given as two 1 ml injections of CZP for at least six months and then 200 mg of CZP sc every two weeks, given as one 1 ml injection. Certolizumab Pegol : Strength and Form: Lyophilized product reconstituted to 1 ml containing 200 mg of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) given as a subcutaneous injection. Dosage and Frequency: 400 mg every two weeks for at least 6 months, then 200 mg every two weeks. Duration: Until end of study. |
Baseline Measures
| Certolizumab Pegol | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
846 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|
| <=18 years | 1 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 736 |
| >=65 years | 109 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ( Full Range ) |
51.5
( 18 to 81 ) |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|
| Female | 701 |
| Male | 145 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|
| Serbia | 45 |
| United States | 56 |
| Estonia | 16 |
| Slovakia | 45 |
| Finland | 5 |
| Ukraine | 81 |
| Lithuania | 42 |
| Russian Federation | 102 |
| Israel | 24 |
| Chile | 11 |
| France | 2 |
| Czech Republic | 122 |
| Hungary | 57 |
| Mexico | 5 |
| Canada | 19 |
| Argentina | 122 |
| Belgium | 5 |
| Croatia | 3 |
| Australia | 12 |
| Bulgaria | 28 |
| Latvia | 26 |
| New Zealand | 18 |
|
Weight
[units: kilogram (kg)] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
73.69 ± 16.17 |
|
Height
[units: centimeter (cm)] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
164.30 ± 8.88 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) From First Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) Dose up to Approximately 7 Years [ Time Frame: From first dose of CZP to the end of the open-label study (approximately 7 years) ] |
| 2. Primary: | Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) From First Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) Dose up to Approximately 7 Years [ Time Frame: From first dose of CZP to the end of the open-label study (approximately 7 years) ] |
| 3. Primary: | Percentage of Subjects Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study [ Time Frame: From Entry Visit (Week 0) to the end of the study (approximately 6.5 years) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 144 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 192 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 240 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Completion/Withdrawal [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 144 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 192 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 240 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Completion/Withdrawal [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 48 of the open-label study ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 96 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 144 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 144 of the open-label study ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 192 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 192 of the open-label study ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 240 [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 240 of the open-label study ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Completion/Withdrawal [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Change From Baseline of the Preceding Double-Blind Study to Week 96 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Week 96 of the open-label study ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Change From Baseline of the Preceding Double-Blind Study to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 24. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Duration of Morning Stiffness [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 25. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR]) [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 26. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Completion/Withdrawal Visit [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 27. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
| 28. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to Completion/Withdrawal Visit in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score [ Time Frame: From Baseline of the preceding double-blind study to Completion/Withdrawal of the open-label study (up to approximately 7 years) ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Organization: UCB
phone: +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
Publications of Results:
| Responsible Party: | UCB, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00175877 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | C87028, 2005-001350-24 |
| Study First Received: | September 9, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | February 4, 2013 |
| Last Updated: | March 22, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration Belgium: Directorate general for the protection of Public health: Medicines Bulgaria: Bulgarian Drug Agency Canada: Health Canada Chile: Instituto de Salud Publica de Chile Croatia: Ministry of Health and Social Care Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control Estonia: The State Agency of Medicine Finland: Finnish Medicines Agency France: L’Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy Israel: Israeli Health Ministry Pharmaceutical Administration Latvia: State Agency of Medicines Lithuania: State Medicine Control Agency - Ministry of Health Mexico: National Institute of Public Health, Health Secretariat New Zealand: Food Safety Authority Russia: Pharmacological Committee, Ministry of Health Serbia and Montenegro: Agency for Drugs and Medicinal Devices Slovakia: State Institute for Drug Control Ukraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health United States: Food and Drug Administration |