Trial of Olanzapine in Patients With Manic or Mixed Episode of Bipolar I Disorder
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Eli Lilly and Company
Information provided by:
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00129220
First received: August 8, 2005
Last updated: December 10, 2010
Last verified: December 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: January 21, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Bipolar Disorder |
| Interventions: |
Drug: olanzapine Drug: haloperidol Drug: placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Study Period I was a week-long Screening Period. Study Period II was a 3-week-long Early Double-Blind Period. Study Period III was a 3-week-long Last Double-Blind Period. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: Study Period II
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 105 | 20 | 99 |
| Received at Least One Dose of Study Drug | 104 | 20 | 97 |
| COMPLETED | 72 | 8 | 52 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 33 | 12 | 47 |
| Adverse Event | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 15 | 1 | 28 |
| Entry Criteria Not Met | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Protocol Violation | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Physician Decision | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Reason Not Specified | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Period 2: Study Period III
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 72 | 8 | 52 |
| COMPLETED | 59 | 7 | 42 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 13 | 1 | 10 |
| Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sponsor Decision | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Reason Not Specified | 9 | 0 | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 | 221 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
43.1 ± 12.0 | 49.3 ± 11.9 | 42.5 ± 10.9 | 43.4 ± 11.6 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 55 | 9 | 57 | 121 |
| Male | 49 | 11 | 40 | 100 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: participants] |
||||
| Japanese | 104 | 20 | 97 | 221 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
||||
| Japan | 104 | 20 | 97 | 221 |
|
Current Illness Episode: Manic versus Mixed
[units: participants] |
||||
| Manic | 95 | 19 | 89 | 203 |
| Mixed | 9 | 1 | 8 | 18 |
|
Current Illness Episode: Psychotic versus Nonpsychotic
[units: participants] |
||||
| Psychotic | 17 | 4 | 19 | 40 |
| Nonpsychotic | 87 | 16 | 78 | 181 |
|
Hospitalization Status
[units: participants] |
||||
| In-Patients | 41 | 10 | 38 | 89 |
| Out-Patients | 63 | 10 | 59 | 132 |
|
Psychosis
[1] [units: participants] |
||||
| Mood-Congruent | 16 | 4 | 19 | 39 |
| Mood-Incongruent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score
[2] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
4.5 ± 3.9 | 4.1 ± 3.7 | 4.9 ± 4.5 | 4.7 ± 4.1 |
|
Age of Onset of Illness
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
31.2 ± 11.6 | 37.7 ± 12.5 | 30.9 ± 10.7 | 31.6 ± 11.4 |
|
Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness, Bipolar Version (CGI-BP)
[3] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||||
| Mania | 4.2 ± 1.0 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 1.0 |
| Depression | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.6 |
| Overall Mood | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 4.1 ± 1.1 |
|
Height
[units: centimeters (cm)] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
162.74 ± 8.07 | 162.10 ± 7.87 | 163.09 ± 9.66 | 162.84 ± 8.76 |
|
Length of Current Illness Episode
[units: days] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
34.6 ± 22.9 | 34.2 ± 22.0 | 33.5 ± 25.4 | 34.1 ± 23.9 |
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Positive Subscale Score
[4] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
11.5 ± 4.8 | 11.3 ± 4.5 | 10.7 ± 4.7 | 11.1 ± 4.7 |
|
Weight
[units: kilograms (kg)] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
60.88 ± 11.69 | 59.20 ± 9.87 | 61.86 ± 13.78 | 61.17 ± 12.49 |
|
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score
[5] [units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
27.7 ± 5.9 | 26.6 ± 4.5 | 26.9 ± 5.6 | 27.3 ± 5.7 |
| [1] | Type of psychosis for those participants who had a current illness episode of psychotic (total number of participants with data in this baseline measure will be less than the total in each arm) |
|---|---|
| [2] | The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). The total score of HAMD-17 may range from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). |
| [3] | A global rating scale for severity of patients adapted to bipolar disorder. Measures severity of the patient's overall severity of manic symptoms, depressive symptoms, and overall mood symptoms. Each of the three symptoms are on a scale of 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). |
| [4] | Assesses positive symptoms associated with schizophrenia. 7 items make up the Positive scale (ex. delusions, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinatory behavior). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (symptom not present) to 7 (symptoms extremely severe). Total Positive Subscale scores range from 7 to 49. For this study, the score was converted to 0 to 6 for each item range; hence, the total positive subscale score ranges from 0 to 42. |
| [5] | The YMRS is an 11-item scale that measures the severity of manic episodes. Four items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 8 (symptom extremely severe). The remaining items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 4 (symptom extremely severe). The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline to 3 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 3 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score |
| Measure Description | The YMRS is an 11-item scale that measures the severity of manic episodes. Four items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 8 (symptom extremely severe). The remaining items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 4 (symptom extremely severe). The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 3 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Change From Baseline to 3 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-12.6 ± 10.0 | -14.3 ± 11.4 | -6.8 ± 14.0 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 3 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Placebo |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -5.62 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -8.87 to -2.37 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Placebo. |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) |
| Measure Description | The YMRS is an 11-item scale that measures the severity of manic episodes. Four items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 8 (symptom extremely severe). The remaining items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 4 (symptom extremely severe). The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-16.0 ± 11.4 | -14.7 ± 13.1 | -10.1 ± 15.8 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.774 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -0.78 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -6.15 to 4.59 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olazapine minus Haloperidol. |
| 3. Secondary: | Remission Rate of Bipolar Disorder (Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol) [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Remission Rate of Bipolar Disorder (Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol) |
| Measure Description | Remission of bipolar disorder was defined as completing the 6-week period with meeting the criteria for Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score of 12 or less and 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total scores of 7 or less at Week 6. YMRS is an 11-item scale measuring severity of manic episodes; total score ranges = 0 (normal) to 60 (severe). The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity; total score ranges = 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). Remission Rate (percent) = number of patients meeting remission criteria divided by number of patients in treatment arm, multiplied by 100. |
| Time Frame | 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 |
|
Remission Rate of Bipolar Disorder (Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol)
[units: percentage of participants] |
44.2 | 20.0 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Remission Rate of Bipolar Disorder (Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.064 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | 21.0 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 1.6 to 40.4 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Haloperidol. |
| 4. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), Overall Severity of Illness [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), Overall Severity of Illness |
| Measure Description | A global rating scale for severity of patients adapted to bipolar disorder. Measures severity of the patient's overall severity of overall mood symptoms on a scale of 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), Overall Severity of Illness
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-1.6 ± 1.5 | -1.3 ± 1.8 | -0.9 ± 1.7 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 6 Week Endpoint in Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), Overall Severity of Illness
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.171 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -0.47 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -1.15 to 0.21 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Haloperidol. |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Mania Subscale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Mania Subscale |
| Measure Description | A global rating scale for severity of patients adapted to bipolar disorder. Measures severity of the patient's overall severity of manic symptoms on a scale of 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Mania Subscale
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| 3-Week Change | -1.2 ± 1.2 | -1.7 ± 1.7 | -0.6 ± 1.5 |
| 6-Week Change | -1.7 ± 1.5 | -1.9 ± 1.9 | -1.0 ± 1.7 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Mania Subscale
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Placebo |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.006 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -0.51 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.87 to -0.15 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 3-Week Change. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Placebo. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Mania Subscale
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.722 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -0.13 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.82 to 0.57 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 6-Week Change. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Haloperidol. |
| 6. Secondary: | Response Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Response Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks |
| Measure Description | Participants who had 50 percent or more decrease from the baseline in YMRS total scores were defined as a responder. The YMRS is an 11-item scale that measures the severity of manic episodes. Four items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 8 (symptom extremely severe). The remaining items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 4 (symptom extremely severe). The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Response Rate (percent) = number of patients meeting response criterion for manic symptom divided by number of patients in treatment arm, multiplied by 100. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Response Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks
[units: percentage of participants] |
|||
| 3 Week Response Rate | 51.0 | 65.0 | 44.3 |
| 6 Week Response Rate | 67.3 | 65.0 | 55.7 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Response Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Placebo |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.333 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 6.7 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -6.7 to 20.1 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 3-Week Response Rate. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Response Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.908 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | -1.3 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -21.0 to 18.4 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 6-Week Response Rate. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 7. Secondary: | Remission Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Remission Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks |
| Measure Description | Participants who had a YMRS total score of 12 or less were considered to be in remission of manic symptoms. YMRS is an 11-item scale that measures severity of manic episodes; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 60 (severe). Remission Rate (percent) = number of patients meeting remission criteria divided by number of patients in treatment arm, multiplied by 100. |
| Time Frame | 3 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Remission Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks
[units: percentage of participants] |
|||
| 3-Week Remission Rate | 47.1 | 65.0 | 41.2 |
| 6-Week Remission Rate | 63.5 | 60.0 | 52.6 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Remission Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Placebo |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.384 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | 5.9 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -7.3 to 19.2 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 3-Week Remission Rate. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Placebo. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Remission Rate of Manic Symptoms at 3 Weeks and 6 Weeks
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.982 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | 0.3 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -21.3 to 21.8 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value is for 6-Week Remission Rate | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Haloperidol. |
| 8. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Symptomatic Depression [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Symptomatic Depression |
| Measure Description | Switch to symptomatic depression was defined as HAMD-17 total score ≥13 at any time in the participants with HAMD-17 total scores ≤7 at baseline. The 17-item HAMD measures depression severity. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). The total score of HAMD-17 may range from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). |
| Time Frame | 3 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set (participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement) who had HAMD-17 total scores ≤7 at baseline. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
83 | 18 | 75 |
|
Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Symptomatic Depression
[units: percentage of participants] |
|||
| 3-Week Symptomatic Depression Rate | 2.4 | 16.7 | 1.3 |
| 6-Week Symptomatic Depression Rate | 2.4 | 16.7 | 2.7 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Symptomatic Depression
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Placebo |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.698 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 0.8 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -3.2 to 4.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 3-Week Symptomatic Depression Rate. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Symptomatic Depression
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.014 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | -14.1 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -31.7 to 3.4 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 6-Week Symptomatic Depression Rate. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 9. Secondary: | Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in the Positive Subscore of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in the Positive Subscore of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) |
| Measure Description | Assesses positive symptoms associated with schizophrenia. 7 items make up the Positive scale (ex. delusions, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinatory behavior). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (symptom not present) to 7 (symptoms extremely severe). Total Positive Subscale scores range from 7 to 49. For this study, the score was converted to 0 to 6 for each item range; hence, the total positive subscale score ranges from 0 to 42. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set: participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
104 | 20 | 97 |
|
Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in the Positive Subscore of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| 3-Week Change | -1.8 ± 4.1 | -1.8 ± 4.3 | -0.0 ± 5.3 |
| 6-Week Change | -2.2 ± 4.4 | -1.6 ± 4.3 | -0.3 ± 5.7 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in the Positive Subscore of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Placebo |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.019 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -1.48 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -2.71 to -0.25 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 3-Week Change. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Placebo. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline to 3 Week and 6 Week Endpoints in the Positive Subscore of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.855 |
| Least Squares Mean Difference [4] | -0.16 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -1.95 to 1.62 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 6-Week Change. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Least Squares Mean Difference = Olanzapine minus Haloperidol. |
| 10. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Syndromic Depression [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Syndromic Depression |
| Measure Description | Switch to syndromic depression was operationally defined by meeting both of the following criteria: At baseline, the symptoms did not meet the criteria for a mixed episode based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). The critiera were met for a Major Depressive Episode (MDE), at any point after randomization, based on DSM-IV-TR. Rather than the 2-week period required for an MDE in the DSM-IV-TR, the patient had to meet the criteria of an MDE for at least 7 consecutive days (during Weeks 1 through 6). |
| Time Frame | 3 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Full Analysis Set (participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurement) who had manic (not mixed) episode at baseline. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
95 | 19 | 89 |
|
Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Syndromic Depression
[units: percentage of participants] |
|||
| 3-Week Syndromic Depression Rate | 0.0 | 5.3 | 0.0 |
| 6-Week Syndromic Depression Rate | 1.1 | 5.3 | 0.0 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Syndromic Depression
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| P Value [3] | 0.136 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | -4.6 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -14.9 to 5.7 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 6-Week Syndromic Depression Rate. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 11. Secondary: | Maximum Change From Baseline During 6-Week Period in Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Maximum Change From Baseline During 6-Week Period in Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) Total Score |
| Measure Description | Drug Induced Extra-Pyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) is a scale used to evaluate the severity of drug induced extra-pyramidal symptoms occurring during antipsychotic drug treatment. Scale consists of 8 individual symptom scales with scores ranging from 0 (none/normal) to 4 (severe). The total score is the sum of the 8 item scores, for a total range of 0 (normal) to 32 (severe). |
| Time Frame | Baseline to 6 weeks |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Participants in the Safety Analysis Set (participants who had baseline and post-baseline measurements). Participants were included in the treatment group for which they actually received treatment. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Olanzapine | olanzapine: 5 to 20 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Haloperidol | haloperidol: 2.5 to 10 mg per day for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | placebo for 3 weeks, then olanzapine 5 to 20 mg per day for 3 weeks |
Measured Values
| Olanzapine | Haloperidol | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
105 | 20 | 96 |
|
Maximum Change From Baseline During 6-Week Period in Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) Total Score
[units: units on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| Baseline | 0.20 ± 0.66 | 0.50 ± 1.19 | 0.30 ± 0.91 |
| Maximum Change from Baseline | 0.70 ± 1.51 | 2.70 ± 2.89 | 0.09 ± 1.09 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Maximum Change From Baseline During 6-Week Period in Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) Total Score
| Groups [1] | Olanzapine vs. Haloperidol |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon Rank Sum |
| P Value [3] | 0.003 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Maximum Change from Baseline. |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by Eli Lilly and Company
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Identified errors were corrected. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Chief Medical Officer
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 800-545-5979
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 800-545-5979
No publications provided by Eli Lilly and Company
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Chief Medical Officer, Eli Lilly |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00129220 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 9636, F1D-JE-BMAC |
| Study First Received: | August 8, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | January 21, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 10, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare |