Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings (PEARLS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
HIV Infections |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Atazanavir Drug: Didanosine (enteric-coated) Drug: Efavirenz Drug: Emtricitabine Drug: Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Drug: Lamivudine/Zidovudine |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Study participants were recruited at 43 sites from 9 countries: 28 in the US, 4 in India, 2 each in Brazil, Malawi, Peru and South Africa, and 1 each in Haiti, Thailand and Zimbabwe, between May 2005 to August 2007. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| HIV-infected, treatment-naive men and women, at least 18 years of age with CD4+ count <300 cells/mm^3. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz |
| ddI+FTC+ATV |
ddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine > > On May 23, 2008, Arm B was closed following a planned interim review by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB recommendation was based upon compelling evidence that Arm B had significantly more virologic failure (and therefore was inferior when) compared to Arm A. Participants still receiving Arm B medications were offered alternatives, and all participants continued to be followed. |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | TDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: PI Comparison
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 519 | 526 | 0 |
| COMPLETED | 464 [1] | 479 [1] | 0 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 55 | 47 | 0 |
| Death | 10 | 9 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 11 | 8 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 33 | 30 | 0 |
| Clinic site closed | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | Follow-up was until ddI+FTC+ATV arm was closed per DSMB recommendation on May 23, 2008. |
|---|
Period 2: NRTI Comparison
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 519 | 0 | 526 |
| COMPLETED | 418 [1] | 0 | 444 [1] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 101 | 0 | 82 |
| Death | 20 | 0 | 18 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 14 | 0 | 12 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 54 | 0 | 38 |
| Clinic site closed | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Not reason above | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | Follow-up though study closeout period (final visit between April 1 and May 31, 2010). |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz |
| ddI+FTC+ATV |
ddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine > > On May 23, 2008, Arm B was closed following a planned interim review by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB recommendation was based upon compelling evidence that Arm B had significantly more virologic failure (and therefore was inferior when) compared to Arm A. Participants still receiving Arm B medications were offered alternatives, and all participants continued to be followed. |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | TDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
519 | 526 | 526 | 1571 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
35 ± 9 | 35 ± 8 | 35 ± 9 | 35 ± 9 |
|
Age, Customized
[units: participants] |
||||
| Between 18 and 29 years | 141 | 146 | 146 | 433 |
| Between 30 and 39 years | 244 | 221 | 225 | 690 |
| Between 40 and 49 years | 100 | 129 | 116 | 345 |
| At least 50 years | 34 | 30 | 39 | 103 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 241 | 256 | 242 | 739 |
| Male | 278 | 270 | 284 | 832 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
||||
| Brazil | 79 | 76 | 76 | 231 |
| Haiti | 35 | 32 | 33 | 100 |
| India | 81 | 86 | 88 | 255 |
| Malawi | 74 | 74 | 73 | 221 |
| Peru | 42 | 48 | 44 | 134 |
| South Africa | 70 | 70 | 70 | 210 |
| Thailand | 32 | 33 | 35 | 100 |
| United States | 70 | 70 | 70 | 210 |
| Zimbabwe | 36 | 37 | 37 | 110 |
|
CD4 count, Continuous
[1] [units: cells/mm^3] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
163 ± 85 | 167 ± 83 | 155 ± 81 | 162 ± 83 |
|
CD4 count, Categorical
[2] [units: participants] |
||||
| < 50 cells/mm^3 | 68 | 63 | 69 | 200 |
| Between 50 and 99 cells/mm^3 | 70 | 77 | 82 | 229 |
| Between 100 and 199 cells/mm^3 | 174 | 161 | 193 | 528 |
| Between 200 and 249 cells/mm^3 | 104 | 128 | 107 | 339 |
| Between 250 and 299 cells/mm^3 | 103 | 97 | 75 | 275 |
|
Plasma HIV-1 RNA, Continuous
[units: log10 copies/mL] Median ( Inter-Quartile Range ) |
5.0
( 4.6 to 5.4 ) |
5.1
( 4.5 to 5.5 ) |
5.0
( 4.5 to 5.5 ) |
5.0
( 4.6 to 5.5 ) |
|
Plasma HIV-1 RNA, Categorical
[units: participants] |
||||
| <= 400 copies/mL | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| Between 400 and 4000 copies/mL | 22 | 19 | 14 | 55 |
| Between 4001 and 40,000 copies/mL | 103 | 119 | 124 | 346 |
| Between 40,001 and 400,000 copies/mL | 311 | 283 | 284 | 878 |
| Between 400,001 and 749,999 copies/mL | 45 | 58 | 55 | 158 |
| >= 750,000 copies/mL | 35 | 40 | 46 | 121 |
| Missing | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| [1] | Screening value used for study eligibility as no other pre-randomization CD4 cell counts available |
|---|---|
| [2] | Screening CD4 count used for study eligibility as no other pre-randomization counts available. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Time to Treatment Failure (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008). ] |
| 2. Primary: | Time to Treatment Failure (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up through study closure (May 31, 2010). ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22,2008) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Time to Immunologic Failure (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At or after Week 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTV+ATV arm closed - May 22,2008) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008) ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout study follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response by Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008) ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 9| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison) |
| Measure Description | Time from randomization to any of the following events occurring prior to week 48: changed any ARV medication (including permanent discontinuation of all medications); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression. |
| Time Frame | Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz |
| ddI+FTC+ATV | ddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | TDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz |
Measured Values
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
519 | 526 | 0 |
|
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison)
[units: weeks] Number ( 95% Confidence Interval ) |
|||
| 5th percentile |
0
( 0 to 0 ) |
0
( 0 to 0 ) |
|
| 10th percentile |
0
( 0 to 0 ) |
0
( 0 to 0 ) |
|
| 25th percentile |
32
( 16 to 48 ) |
48
( 32 to NA ) [1] |
|
| [1] | Not estimable as the upper limit for survival function at all weeks is above 75% |
|---|
No statistical analysis provided for Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison)
| 10. Secondary: | Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout follow-up until study closed (May 31,2010) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Time to Immunologic Failure (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At or after Week 48 (including all follow-up through study closure - May 31,2010) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including all follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 (using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 96 (using follow-up through to study closure on May 31,2010) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 96 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout study follow-up until study closure (May 31, 2010) ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Organization: Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard School of Public Health
phone: 617-432-2829
e-mail: CBAR.ClinicalTrials.Gov@sdac.harvard.edu
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Daniel R. Kuritzkes, M.D., Social & Scientific Systems, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00084136 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ACTG A5175, 1U01AI068636, PEARLS, A5185s, 5-K24-AI051966-03 |
| Study First Received: | June 7, 2004 |
| Results First Received: | July 13, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | August 10, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |