Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings (PEARLS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
HIV Infections |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Atazanavir Drug: Didanosine (enteric-coated) Drug: Efavirenz Drug: Emtricitabine Drug: Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Drug: Lamivudine/Zidovudine |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Study participants were recruited at 43 sites from 9 countries: 28 in the US, 4 in India, 2 each in Brazil, Malawi, Peru and South Africa, and 1 each in Haiti, Thailand and Zimbabwe, between May 2005 to August 2007. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| HIV-infected, treatment-naive men and women, at least 18 years of age with CD4+ count <300 cells/mm^3. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz |
| ddI+FTC+ATV |
ddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine > > On May 23, 2008, Arm B was closed following a planned interim review by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB recommendation was based upon compelling evidence that Arm B had significantly more virologic failure (and therefore was inferior when) compared to Arm A. Participants still receiving Arm B medications were offered alternatives, and all participants continued to be followed. |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | TDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: PI Comparison
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 519 | 526 | 0 |
| COMPLETED | 464 [1] | 479 [1] | 0 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 55 | 47 | 0 |
| Death | 10 | 9 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 11 | 8 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 33 | 30 | 0 |
| Clinic site closed | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | Follow-up was until ddI+FTC+ATV arm was closed per DSMB recommendation on May 23, 2008. |
|---|
Period 2: NRTI Comparison
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 519 | 0 | 526 |
| COMPLETED | 418 [1] | 0 | 444 [1] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 101 | 0 | 82 |
| Death | 20 | 0 | 18 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 14 | 0 | 12 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 54 | 0 | 38 |
| Clinic site closed | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Not reason above | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | Follow-up though study closeout period (final visit between April 1 and May 31, 2010). |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz |
| ddI+FTC+ATV |
ddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine > > On May 23, 2008, Arm B was closed following a planned interim review by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB recommendation was based upon compelling evidence that Arm B had significantly more virologic failure (and therefore was inferior when) compared to Arm A. Participants still receiving Arm B medications were offered alternatives, and all participants continued to be followed. |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | TDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | ddI+FTC+ATV | TDF/FTC+EFV | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
519 | 526 | 526 | 1571 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
35 ± 9 | 35 ± 8 | 35 ± 9 | 35 ± 9 |
|
Age, Customized
[units: participants] |
||||
| Between 18 and 29 years | 141 | 146 | 146 | 433 |
| Between 30 and 39 years | 244 | 221 | 225 | 690 |
| Between 40 and 49 years | 100 | 129 | 116 | 345 |
| At least 50 years | 34 | 30 | 39 | 103 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 241 | 256 | 242 | 739 |
| Male | 278 | 270 | 284 | 832 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
||||
| Brazil | 79 | 76 | 76 | 231 |
| Haiti | 35 | 32 | 33 | 100 |
| India | 81 | 86 | 88 | 255 |
| Malawi | 74 | 74 | 73 | 221 |
| Peru | 42 | 48 | 44 | 134 |
| South Africa | 70 | 70 | 70 | 210 |
| Thailand | 32 | 33 | 35 | 100 |
| United States | 70 | 70 | 70 | 210 |
| Zimbabwe | 36 | 37 | 37 | 110 |
|
CD4 count, Continuous
[1] [units: cells/mm^3] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
163 ± 85 | 167 ± 83 | 155 ± 81 | 162 ± 83 |
|
CD4 count, Categorical
[2] [units: participants] |
||||
| < 50 cells/mm^3 | 68 | 63 | 69 | 200 |
| Between 50 and 99 cells/mm^3 | 70 | 77 | 82 | 229 |
| Between 100 and 199 cells/mm^3 | 174 | 161 | 193 | 528 |
| Between 200 and 249 cells/mm^3 | 104 | 128 | 107 | 339 |
| Between 250 and 299 cells/mm^3 | 103 | 97 | 75 | 275 |
|
Plasma HIV-1 RNA, Continuous
[units: log10 copies/mL] Median ( Inter-Quartile Range ) |
5.0
( 4.6 to 5.4 ) |
5.1
( 4.5 to 5.5 ) |
5.0
( 4.5 to 5.5 ) |
5.0
( 4.6 to 5.5 ) |
|
Plasma HIV-1 RNA, Categorical
[units: participants] |
||||
| <= 400 copies/mL | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| Between 400 and 4000 copies/mL | 22 | 19 | 14 | 55 |
| Between 4001 and 40,000 copies/mL | 103 | 119 | 124 | 346 |
| Between 40,001 and 400,000 copies/mL | 311 | 283 | 284 | 878 |
| Between 400,001 and 749,999 copies/mL | 45 | 58 | 55 | 158 |
| >= 750,000 copies/mL | 35 | 40 | 46 | 121 |
| Missing | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| [1] | Screening value used for study eligibility as no other pre-randomization CD4 cell counts available |
|---|---|
| [2] | Screening CD4 count used for study eligibility as no other pre-randomization counts available. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Time to Treatment Failure (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008). ] |
| 2. Primary: | Time to Treatment Failure (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up through study closure (May 31, 2010). ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22,2008) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Time to Immunologic Failure (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At or after Week 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTV+ATV arm closed - May 22,2008) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008) ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout study follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response by Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout follow-up until study closed (May 31,2010) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Time to Immunologic Failure (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At or after Week 48 (including all follow-up through study closure - May 31,2010) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including all follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 (using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 96 (using follow-up through to study closure on May 31,2010) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 48 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Week 96 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (NRTI Comparison) [ Time Frame: Throughout study follow-up until study closure (May 31, 2010) ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Organization: Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard School of Public Health
phone: 617-432-2829
e-mail: CBAR.ClinicalTrials.Gov@sdac.harvard.edu
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Daniel R. Kuritzkes, M.D., Social & Scientific Systems, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00084136 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ACTG A5175, 1U01AI068636, PEARLS, A5185s, 5-K24-AI051966-03 |
| Study First Received: | June 7, 2004 |
| Results First Received: | July 13, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | August 10, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |