Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
Epothilone (Ixabepilone) Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00082433   Information provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb
First Received: May 7, 2004   Last Updated: November 16, 2009   History of Changes
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Conditions: Cancer
Breast Cancer
Interventions: Drug: Ixabepilone + Capecitabine
Drug: Capecitabine

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
PLEASE NOTE: Completed=number of participants completing ≥18 cycles of treatment; not completed=number of subjects coming off study treatment prior to completing at least 18 cycles, with specified reasons for coming off study treatment. Participants continued to be followed for overall survival.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
STARTED   609     612  
COMPLETED   15[1]   15[2]
NOT COMPLETED   594     597  
      Adverse Event               12                 17  
      Death               8                 18  
      Disease Progression/Relapse               270                 388  
      Physician Decision               50                 61  
      Lost to Follow-up               1                 2  
      Study Drug Toxicity               179                 66  
      Withdrawal by Subject               55                 30  
      Still On Treatment               2                 1  
      Not Treated               12                 11  
      Ineligible               2                 1  
      Noncompliance               2                 1  
      New primary cancer               1                 0  
      Impending surgery               0                 1  
[1] Participants who received 18 or more cycles of treatment.
[2] Participants who received 18 or more cycles of treatment.



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Baseline Measures
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine Total
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
609 612 1221
Age, Customized  
[units: participants]
     
<65 years 532 531 1063
≥65 years 77 81 158
<50 years 225 235 460
≥50 years 384 377 761
Age  
[units: years]
Median ( Full Range )
53.0
( 23.0 to 78.0 )
53.0
( 24.0 to 81.0 )
53.0
( 23.0 to 81.0 )
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female 609 612 1221
Male 0 0 0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized  
[units: participants]
     
American Indian or Alaska Native 1 2 3
Asian 90 69 159
Black or African American 25 21 46
White 480 502 982
Unknown or Not Reported 13 18 31
Karnofsky performance Status[1]
[units: units on a scale]
     
100 219 265 484
90 187 188 375
80 151 130 281
70 44 26 70
<70 2 2 4
not reported 6 1 7
Menopausal Status  
[units: participants]
     
Premenopausal 93 90 183
Perimenopausal 32 32 64
Postmenopausal 475 481 956
Not Reported 9 9 18
Organ Sites  
[units: participants]
     
Ascites 13 16 29
Bone 283 287 570
Brain 0 1 1
Breast 41 54 95
Chest Wall Mass 47 38 85
CNS 1 0 1
Cutaneous 64 57 121
Effusion 7 7 14
Intestine 1 1 2
Lymph Node 236 233 469
Mediastinum 54 52 106
Other 17 30 47
Pleura 86 84 170
Subcutaneous 23 24 47
Visceral, Liver 273 276 549
Visceral, Lung 221 217 438
Visceral, Other 24 26 50
Presence with at least 1 lesion  
[units: participants]
606 612 1218
[1] Karnofsky Performance Scale Index measures a patient's functional impairment: 100-80=able to carry on normal activity and work, no special care; 70-50=unable to work; able to live at home and care for most personal needs with assistance; 40=unable to care for self; requires institutional or hospital care. Score reported in multiples of 10.



  Outcome Measures
  Hide All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Overall Survival (OS)   [ from date of randomization until death ]

Measure Type Primary
Measure Title Overall Survival (OS)
Measure Description Overall survival was defined as the time in months from randomization until the date of death. For those patients who had not died, survival duration was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive. Median OS with 95% CI estimated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Method.
Time Frame from date of randomization until death  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Analysis was conducted on all randomized patients on an intent to treat basis. This study required at least 846 events (deaths) to ensure the 2-sided, α = 0.05 level, log-rank test to have 90% power to show a statistically significant difference in OS between treatment groups when the hazard ratio (HR) is 0.8.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
609 612
Overall Survival (OS)
[units: months]
Median ( 95% Confidence Interval )
16.39
( 14.95 to 17.91 )
15.64
( 13.86 to 17.02 )


Statistical Analysis 1 for Overall Survival (OS)
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Log Rank
P Value [3] .1162
Hazard Ratio (HR) [4] .90
95% Confidence Interval ( .78 to 1.03 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  This primary analysis was a comparison between the 2 treatment arms using a 2-sided, α=0.05 level log-rank test (to reject the null hypothesis of equality of survival). The analysis was conducted when 880 deaths (430 in combination:450 in capecitabine) were observed from the 1221 randomized participants.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  The analysis was conducted at the 0.05 level and no adjustments were performed
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  The test was stratified by (taxane resistance [yes/no], measurable disease versus non-measurable disease, prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease [yes/no], and anthracycline resistance [yes/no]).
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Overall Survival (OS)
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Regression, Cox
P Value [3] .0231
Hazard Ratio (HR) [4] .85
95% Confidence Interval ( .75 to .98 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  This prespecified secondary analysis was a Cox model adjusted for age, Karnofsky performance status, number of organ sites, estrogen receptor status, hepatic impairment, time from diagnosis, liver/lung metastases.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



2.  Secondary:   Progression-Free Survival (PFS)   [ every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression ]

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Measure Description PFS was defined for each patient as the time in months from randomization to the date of progression. Patients who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on their date of death. Patients who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last tumor assessment.
Time Frame every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
All randomized patients with measurable disease as stratified at the time of randomization; n=480 and n=480 for the 2 treatment groups, respectively. Analysis was conducted once 903 progressions or deaths were observed in 960 participants.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
480 480
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
[units: months]
Median ( 95% Confidence Interval )
6.24
( 5.59 to 6.77 )
4.40
( 4.14 to 5.42 )


Statistical Analysis 1 for Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Log Rank
P Value [3] .0005
Hazard Ratio (HR) [4] .79
95% Confidence Interval ( .69 to .90 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  The analysis was conducted when 903 progressions or deaths (446 in combination:457 in capecitabine) were observed in 960 participants.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



3.  Secondary:   Response Rate (RR)   [ every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression ]

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Response Rate (RR)
Measure Description RR=number of patients in that group whose best response is "partial"(30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or "complete" (disappearance of all target lesions), according to the 4-item Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), divided by the total number of response-evaluable participants
Time Frame every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Response-evaluable participants (all treated participants with the correct diagnosis of adenocarcinoma originating in the breast who had measurable disease as determined at baseline).

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
462 462
Response Rate (RR)
[units: percentage of participants]
Mean ( 95% Confidence Interval )
43.3
( 38.7 to 47.9 )
28.8
( 24.7 to 33.2 )


Statistical Analysis 1 for Response Rate (RR)
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
P Value [3] <.0001
Odds Ratio (OR) [4] 1.89
95% Confidence Interval ( 1.44 to 2.50 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



4.  Secondary:   Duration of Response   [ every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression ]

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Duration of Response
Measure Description Measured from the time RECIST criteria (described in previous outcome measure) were first met for "complete" or "partial" response until first date of documented disease progression or death. Patients who neither relapsed nor died were censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Median w/ 95% CI estimated using Kaplan Meier Product Limit Method.
Time Frame every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Response-evaluable participants (all treated patients with the correct diagnosis of adenocarcinoma originating in the breast who had measurable disease as determined at baseline)

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
200 133
Duration of Response
[units: Months]
Median ( 95% Confidence Interval )
6.1
( 5.5 to 7.0 )
6.3
( 5.3 to 7.6 )

No statistical analysis provided for Duration of Response



5.  Secondary:   Time to Response   [ every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression ]

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Time to Response
Measure Description Time to response was defined as the time from the first dose of study therapy until measurement criteria were first met for "partial" or "complete" (whichever status was recorded first) per RECIST criteria (a 4-item scale described in the previous outcome measure).
Time Frame every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Response-evaluable participants (all treated patients with the correct diagnosis of adenocarcinoma originating in the breast who had measurable disease as determined at baseline)

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
200 133
Time to Response
[units: weeks]
Median ( Full Range )
6.6
( 4.7 to 47.9 )
6.6
( 4.6 to 59.4 )

No statistical analysis provided for Time to Response



6.  Secondary:   Treatment-Related Safety Summary   [ safety was assessed on a continual basis every cycle while on-treatment and every 4 weeks post treatment until toxicities resolved or were deemed irreversible. ]

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Treatment-Related Safety Summary
Measure Description Laboratory values, adverse events, and other symptoms were graded using the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC) Version 3.0
Time Frame safety was assessed on a continual basis every cycle while on-treatment and every 4 weeks post treatment until toxicities resolved or were deemed irreversible.  
Safety Issue Yes  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
All patients who received at least 1 dose of ixabepilone and/or capecitabine. Participants with baseline hepatic impairment (combination arm, n = 50; capecitabine arm, n = 37), defined as Grade ≥2 AST, ALT or Grade ≥1 total bilirubin, were contraindicated due to disproportionate number of toxic deaths observed in study CA163-046.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
595 603
Treatment-Related Safety Summary
[units: Participants]
   
Deaths within 30 days of last dose 19 42
Treatment-related serious adverse events 125 64
Treatment-related Grade 3-4 adverse events 458 240
Treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation 286 66

No statistical analysis provided for Treatment-Related Safety Summary



7.  Secondary:   Symptom Assessment Score Changes From Baseline for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI)   [ Baseline and prior to each 21-day cycle of treatment, and at first posttreatment follow-up assessment ]

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Symptom Assessment Score Changes From Baseline for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI)
Measure Description Quality of life, as measured by the FBSI, an 8-item, participant-reported instrument to measure symptoms. Each item has 5 possible responses ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The scoring was conducted according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy manual, Version 4; higher scores reflect fewer symptoms.
Time Frame Baseline and prior to each 21-day cycle of treatment, and at first posttreatment follow-up assessment  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Analysis was conducted on all randomized participants on an intent to treat basis. (Note: while table only reports data up to 24 wks, which represents most results, statistical analysis includes ALL assessments through study and follow-up; a few participants were assessed after more than 100 weeks.)

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine (combination group): Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each cycle only, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (BID) (2000 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.
Capecitabine Capecitabine alone: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 BID (2500 mg/m2 daily dose) x 14 days, followed by 1 week of rest.

Measured Values
  Ixabepilone + Capecitabine Capecitabine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
609 612
Symptom Assessment Score Changes From Baseline for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI)
[units: units on a scale]
Mean ( 95% Confidence Interval )
   
Week 3 (n=440; n=429) -0.5
( -0.96 to 0.20 )
0.0
( -0.44 to 0.45 )
Week 6 (n=379; n=353) -0.9
( -1.45 to -0.31 )
0.5
( 0.02 to 1.06 )
Week 9 (n=330; n=283) -1.5
( -2.15 to -0.79 )
0.7
( 0.06 to 1.24 )
Week 12 (n=283; n=250) -1.4
( -2.06 to -0.64 )
1.1
( 0.48 to 1.78 )
Week 15 (n=255; n=240) -1.9
( -2.73 to -1.15 )
1.5
( 0.90 to 2.18 )
Week 18 (n=205; n=202) -1.3
( -2.07 to -0.50 )
1.2
( 0.41 to 1.89 )
Week 21 (n=166; n=185) -1.4
( -2.36 to -0.37 )
1.7
( 0.97 to 2.45 )
Week 24 (n=149; n=141) -1.4
( -2.46 to -0.41 )
1.1
( 0.19 to 1.96 )


Statistical Analysis 1 for Symptom Assessment Score Changes From Baseline for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI)
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Wei-Lachin
P Value [3] <0.0001
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  There was a statistically significant difference between groups in change from baseline FBSI score favoring capecitabine. A mean change from baseline of 2.5 was considered a clinically meaningful difference (minimally important difference or MID). On-treatment mean changes in the FBSI did not reach the MID in either group.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.




  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: BMS Study Director
Organization: Bristol-Myers Squibb
e-mail: Clinical.Trials@bms.com


No publications provided


Responsible Party: Bristol-Myers Squibb ( Study Director )
Study ID Numbers: CA163-048
Study First Received: May 7, 2004
Results First Received: May 1, 2009
Last Updated: November 16, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00082433     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration